https://old.reddit.com/r/indieheads/comments/1r6x1ix/fresh_failure_the_air_is_on_fire_from_location/

I looked it up, and this one is credited to Glen Wexler, who is an actual artist with a pretty distinct style and yes, he's been incorporating AI into his process lately, and I guess he did use it here (those windows on those buildings are sus as hell, and the overall sharpness of the image just screams AI).

So it's not outright slop, but still pretty disappointing and incongruous coming from this band. Their last two records were examining our society's alienation through technology, at times to the point of "phone bad!" level nagging, but using the most literally destructive technology of them all is fine, as long as it helps keep the costs down, I guess?

And it just doesn't look good, but come to think of it, most of their albums have bad cover art, it's almost like they do it on purpose. Love the music, though.

It's too bad if true, I can't unsee it now. for reference: https://failureband.bandcamp.com/album/location-lost

Posting for archival and indexing purposes: u/GorillasAreForEating found an Urbit post titled "Quis cancellat ipsos cancellores?" which complains that Aella takes it on herself to exclude people and movements from the broader LessWrong/Effective Altruist community. The poster says that Aella was the anonymous person who pushed CFAR to finally do something about Brent Dill, because she was roommates with "Persephone." He or she does not quite say that any of the accusations were untrue, just that "an anonymous, unverified report" says that some details were changed by an editor, and that her Medium post was of "dramatically lower fidelity, but higher memetic virulence" than Brent's buddies investigating him behind closed doors (Dill posted about domming a 16-year-old who he met when she was 15). The poster accuses Aella of using substances and BDSM games to blur the line of consent.

The post names Joscha Bach as someone Aella tried to exclude. We recently talked abut Bach's attempt to get Jeffrey Epstein to fund an event where our friends would speak.

Often, people in messed-up situations point at a very similar situation and say "at least we are not like that." I hope that all of these people find friends who can give them perspective that none of these communities are healthy or just. Whether you are in to bull sessions or polyamory, there are healthy communities to explore in any medium-sized city!

ai;dr https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/aidr-meaning

Do we have any idea why some of the Zizians ended up in Vermont? The only thing in their network that comes to mind is the Monastic Academy for the Preservation of Life on Earth (MAPLE, a Buddhist-flavoured CFAR offshoot with the usual Medium post accusing leaders of sexual and psychological abuse)

Vermont and New Hampshire have clusters of generic Libertarians.

this article that tries to argue that we have managed to achieve AGI already is a real hoot

Baldur Bjarnason gives his thoughts on the software job market, predicting a collapse regardless of how AI shakes out:

If you model the impact of working LLM coding tools (big increase in productivity, little downside) where the bottlenecks are largely outside of coding, increases in coding automation mostly just reduce the need for labour. I.e. 10x increase means you need 10x fewer coders, collapsing the job market

If you model the impact of working LLM coding tools with no bottlenecks, then the increase in productivity massively increases the supply of undifferentiated software and the prices you can charge for any software drops through the floor, collapsing the job market

If the models increase output but are flawed, as in they produce too many defects or have major quality issues, Akerlof's market for lemons kicks in, bad products drive out good, value of software in the market heads south, collapsing the job market

If the model impact is largely fictitious, meaning this is all a scam and the perceived benefit is just a clusterfuck of cognitive hazards, then the financial bubble pop will be devastating, tech as an industry will largely be destroyed, and trust in software will be zero, collapsing the job market

I can only think of a few major offsetting forces:

• If the EU invests in replacing US software, bolstering the EU job market.
• China might have substantial unfulfilled domestic demand for software, propping up their job market
• Companies might find that declining software quality harms their bottom-line, leading to a Y2K-style investment in fixing their software stacks

But those don't seem likely to do more than partially offset the decline. Kind of hoping I'm missing something

need a word for the sort of tech 'innovation' that consists of inventing and monetizing new types of externalities which regulators aren't willing to address. like how bird scooters aren't a scam, but they profit off of littering sidewalk space so that ppl with disabilities can't get around

EDIT: a similar, perhaps the same concept is innovation which functions by capturing or monopolizing resources that aren't as yet understood to be resources. in the bird example, we don't think of sidewalk space as a capturable resource, and yet

new episode of odium symposium. we look at rousseau's program for using universal education to turn woman into drones

https://www.patreon.com/posts/project-1789-150782184

The phrase "ambient AI listening in our hospital" makes me hear the "Dies Irae" in my head.

A longread on AI greenwashing begins thusly:

The expansion of data centres - which is driven in large part by AI growth - is creating a shocking new demand for fossil fuels. The tech companies driving AI expansion try to downplay AI’s proven climate impacts by claiming that AI will eventually help solve climate change. Our analysis of these claims suggests that rather than relying on credible and substantiated data, these companies are writing themselves a blank cheque to pollute on the empty promise of future salvation. While the current negative effects of AI on the climate are clear, proven and growing, the promise of large-scale solutions is often based on wishful thinking, and almost always presented with scant evidence.

(Via.)

holy fuck I actually just burst out laughing at this

i've collided with an article* https://harshanu.space/en/tech/ccc-vs-gcc/

you might be wondering why it doesn't highlight that it fails to compile linux kernel, or why it states that using pieces of gcc where vibecc fails is "fair", or why it neglects to say that failing linker means it's not useful in any way, or why just relying on "no errors" isn't enough when it's already known that vibecc will happily eat invalid c. it's explained by:

Disclaimer

Part of this work was assisted by AI. The Python scripts used to generate benchmark results and graphs were written with AI assistance. The benchmark design, test execution, analysis and writing were done by a human with AI helping where needed.

even with all this slant, by their own vibecoded benchmark, vibecc is still complete dogshit with sqlite compiled with it being slower up to 150000x times in some cases

AI bros do new experiments in making themselves even stupider. Going from 'explain what you did but dumb it down for me and my degraded attention span' into 'just make a simplified cartoon out of it'.

Proud of not understanding what is going on. None of these people could hack the Gibson.

E: If they all hate programming so much, perhaps a change of job is in question, sure might not pay as much, but it might make them happier.

Scott Shambaugh mulls about an AI alignment issue following his run-in with a bot last week

in today's news about magical prompts that super totes give you superpowers:

We introduced SKILLSBENCH, the first benchmark to systematically evaluate Agent Skills as first-class artifacts. Across 84 tasks, 7 agent-model configurations, and 7,308 trajectories under three conditions (no Skills, curated Skills, self-generated Skills), our evaluation yields four key findings: (1) curated Skills provide substantial but variable benefit (+16.2 percentage points average, with high variance across domains and configurations); (2) self-generated Skills provide negligible or negative benefit (–1.3pp average), demonstrating that effective Skills require human-curated domain expertise

I am jack's surprised face

...and given I have other yaks, I shall not step on my "software and tools don't have to suck" soapbox right now