o7___o7

How would you first approach explaining this shit past “it can’t be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong”?

This is the question of the moment, isn't it?

I have no answers, but i can say thanks for being a light in the dumbness.

OpenNutrition -- ~~a dataset~~ an LLM that allows you to play "vibe nutritionist"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43569190

First response is good quality:

This is not a dataset. This is an insult to the very idea of data. This is the most anti-scientific post I have ever seen voted to the top of HN. Truth about the world is not derived from three LLMs stacked on top of each other in a trenchcoat.

Financial Times agrees with this analysis

https://archive.is/6JGEI

Those tariff rates, and especially the targets, were 100% pooped out by grok.

Yakshaven

Lots of politics outlets have been linking his recent work. He's done a great job documenting the consequences (and gravity) of the ongoing grant apocalypse for the AAAS journal Science. I've loved him for years for being the FOOF guy.

OK hear me out: they make a new season of Hell Girl, but she only gets people who use gen ai

On the bright side, Derek Lowe has also escaped containment, which is nice

Turns out that they can only stack shit so high before it falls back to earth

Too true

This was strangely comforting. A++

Bill Gates, a man who is not needed for most things, suffers from projection.