[–] 1 point 13 minutes ago

Imagine if you do that as a baker. 'Hey flour/sugar/yeast supplier, I can't pay your for your products, but I will pay you in stocks to our bakery, I'm planning to sell our bakery soon, and as we don't have to pay you for the supplies, we can sell our product at below the going rate making sure we look good for the sale of the company'.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    It is amazing in a way, there are computer scientists who work at the highest level of their field, so they understand computers better than most, but they have more trouble than you or me installing linux.

    Understanding something doesnt mean you can build it.

    (I know this will be met with 'well then you dont understand it deep enough' and that just reminds me that there always will be place for god in the gaps of science).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

    It's unfortunately common that authors see their work posted, join the site, but then only use us for traffic. Hopefully this time helps them understand the difference between a symbiotic and parasitic relationship.

    This feels like a very weird thing to say. (I'm reminded of some weird things Elon Musks mom said about how twitter users should be more grateful for all the traffic or something).

    I mean the bit above it makes sense (making a hard only '25% of post can be self promotion' seems like a recipe for disaster however) but this added line made me raise a few eyebrows.

    E: Wait, I should have compared it to facebooks new 'you need to pay if you post links' policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    This doesnt apply to everything, like VR and 3d printers were a sci-fi fantasy and now they are mundane economically viable but not revolutionary products.

    Biohacking and nanomachines otoh dont seem to be viable and you hear nothing about those anymore. Only a little bit in the uncreative (and going on the experts unrealistic) 'ai will create bioweapons' critihype. No 'It will turn people into cyberzombies' (quake 2 was pretty good (that was aliens not AI but still)).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

    Not sure if the book also did super exp lines, but the graphs in the singularity is near also have various issues that never got to much deep thought.

    Always found it funny that the book admits basically (no direct quote): "sure tech follows an S-curve normally, and that looks exponential at first, but if you take the rate of all historic new techs together on a timeline that clearly is exponential".

    And I just thought, you cant know if it is, thats the point with the S-curve as well, and it messes people up. (Like Disco Stew from the Simpsons), and your N=1, it might not even be a S-curve, it could just have a sudden ceiling.

    Despite wanting to believe, I was less convinced. (also, not sure if it was just my copy but Yudkowsky's name was spelled wrong, still looking for somebody who has a physical copy who is willing to check for me if that was also in print or just a pdf error)

    Back to the subject, a course in business management would have also helped here.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
     

    As we don't have a top level post about this already (nor on reddit) I thought why not make one. Archive.is

    Extremely likely the guy was a lesswronger, or at least radicalized by that sort of thinking.

    But not much else seems to be known as far as I can tell. Corbin also posted about the HN reactions in the stubsack.

    And remember, no fed posting.

    Edit: looks like his house also got shot. Archive (after the speculation in this thread, makes you wonder if this was a follow up false flag, as the bottle didn't break last time).

     

    Via reddits sneerclub. Thanks u/aiworldism.

    I have called LW a cult incubator for a while now, and while the term has not catched on, nice to see more reporting on the problem that lw makes you more likely to join a cult.

    https://www.aipanic.news/p/the-rationality-trap the original link for the people who dont like archive.is used the archive because I dont like substack and want to discourage its use.

    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
     

    As found by @gerikson here, more from the anti anti TESCREAL crowd. How the antis are actually R9PRESENTATIONALism. Ottokar expanded on their idea in a blog post.

    Original link.

    I have not read the bigger blog post yet btw, just assumed it would be sneerable and posted it here for everyone's amusement. Learn about your own true motives today. (This could be a troll of course, boy does he drop a lot of names and thinks that is enough to link things).

    E: alternative title: Ideological Turing Test, a critical failure

     

    Original title 'What we talk about when we talk about risk'. article explains medical risk and why the polygenic embryo selection people think about it the wrong way. Includes a mention of one of our Scotts (you know the one). Non archived link: https://theinfinitesimal.substack.com/p/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about

    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
     

    Begrudgingly Yeast (@begrudginglyyeast.bsky.social) on bsky informed me that I should read this short story called 'Death and the Gorgon' by Greg Egan as he has a good handle on the subjects/subjects we talk about. We have talked about Greg before on Reddit.

    I was glad I did, so going to suggest that more people he do it. The only complaint you can have is that it gives no real 'steelman' airtime to the subjects/subjects it is being negative about. But well, he doesn't have to, he isn't the guardian. Anyway, not going to spoil it, best to just give it a read.

    And if you are wondering, did the lesswrongers also read it? Of course: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hx5EkHFH5hGzngZDs/comment-on-death-and-the-gorgon (Warning, spoilers for the story)

    (Note im not sure this pdf was intended to be public, I did find it on google, but might not be meant to be accessible this way).

    submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
     

    The interview itself

    Got the interview via Dr. Émile P. Torres on twitter

    Somebody else sneered: 'Makings of some fantastic sitcom skits here.

    "No, I can't wash the skidmarks out of my knickers, love. I'm too busy getting some incredibly high EV worrying done about the Basilisk. Can't you wash them?"

    https://mathbabe.org/2024/03/16/an-interview-with-someone-who-left-effective-altruism/

     

    Some light sneerclub content in these dark times.

    Eliezer complements Musk on the creation of community notes. (A project which predates the takeover of twitter by a couple of years (see the join date: https://twitter.com/CommunityNotes )).

    In reaction Musk admits he never read HPMOR and he suggests a watered down Turing test involving HPMOR.

    Eliezer invents HPMOR wireheads in reaction to this.

    view more: next ›