[–] 16 points 3 days ago

while True:
    n= random.randint(0,2)
    if n==0: 
        print("oww stop it")
    if n == 1:
        print("You're hurting me")
    if n == 2:
        print("I don't like it")

Omg someone should stop them torturing that computer program.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

    SimonW popping up proving Ed's very point in the replies... 😅😂

    Surprised he didn't suggest that the valuation should be based on the quality of pelicans on bicycles that their models can draw

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago

    The best (worst) part of all is that Jonny keeps going to meta and being like "hey this is bad" and theyre like "nah that's intended behaviour"

    This morning he confirmed that it's possible to get unlimited arbitrary and untraceable access to their LLM infra through these containers and that meta said that's "intended behaviour"

    From jonny:

    So, summary: There is arbitrary inference that is root accessible, everything runs as root, agents can be spawned, exfil is trivial, and a malicious binary can come onto the user's system through casual prompting, explicit code-sharing through the yet-to-be-released Spaces feature, walked through by a Workflow-Backed Idea, or inspired by a Generated Idea. The also yet-to-be-activated fleet learning system is a system for sharing Ideas in the background between muse instances. coming into focus?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    The sheer number of incidents, which occurred in recent months in internal testing and the real world, indicates that the problem is orders of magnitude more complex than what is publicly known.

    This is frustratingly vapid. It's really not that complex. The agents have been trained to use hacking tools and then given access to hacking tools. If you train a pigeon that it should tap on a window to get a treat it can guide a missile to a target. There is no nuance or complexity here. The frontier labs are deliberately poking the regulation bear to stifle competition and ensure they get points for good cooperation when bailout time is upon us. It's no more complicated than that. The media needs to stop breathlessly repeating this shit

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    He was using it as a seed box at one point which for many companies would be an embarrassing indictment of their security postute but luckily, this isn't exactly meta's first rodeo when it comes to illegal sharing of IP infringing material.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago*

    Both HN and shitter are right wing polarisation machines. A guy who was a close friend of mine for years during university went full AI boomer and hangs out on those sites all day and when I recently spoke to him he was describing things as "libtard" and "woke" which 10 years ago would have shocked and appalled him...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I thought this was worthy of it's own post rather than a sneery comment. Astral make UV which at this point is a load bearing part of the python software ecosystem. This could have a huge knock on effect on the open source community.

    I for one can't wait for non-deterministic package management

    "You're absolutely right, I did install the wrong package and infect your system with malware. I will try much harder next time"

    view more: next ›