136
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago

CW for what the post details but no, they are not ok. Will be keeping her laptop for a year and a half?

https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1974t9g/police_have_seized_my_wifes_laptop_after_one_of/

[-] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

England's (derogatory) legal repression of sexuality and their brutally invasive police and surveillance has always fascinated. Oh, you're doing sex out of the missionary position with the lights on? That's a crown offense guv we're shipping you to australia! Fucking odd country.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

I despise the anglosphere so much its unreal. An entire culture that's just the "no fun allowed" meme.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The keeping her laptop thing is unfortunately the norm in western countries. They can't just copy the hard drives and give it back, they have to keep the "evidence" for the entire duration of the "investigation".

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

It's sick. "You can beat the rap but you can't beat the ride". The pigs can destroy your life just because you came under suspicion.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Tell me about it. In the US they can seize any cash you have and hold it indefinitely without trial - one more reason to go cashless I guess.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They can accuse your cash of a crime, then you have to prove that your cash didn't do crimes, and since that's stupid and impossible the cops just pocket it and use it to buy more cop toys. It's like the second largest dollar amount of theft after wage theft. utterly disgusting. They're literally highway robbers, excelt it's legal.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.

[-] [email protected] 68 points 1 year ago

Oi, you got a loicense for 'at install of Schlongs of Skyrim, mate?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

The mods in question were for having sex with literally anything that moves, including the animals

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

Some lady wants her elf character to have crudely animated sex with a low-res Skyrim mammoth? Off to the Tower with you

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I'm fairly certain they have anti-bestiality laws over there. Which to me makes the other dude a snitch and a narc

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

normalize stitches for snitches

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a bit of an interesting legal question IMO. If it's illegal to perform bestiality, that clearly doesn't make it illegal to simulate it, you would need a separate law or clause to cover that. If it's illegal to record bestiality, same thing - simply having the code on your computer to animate characters fucking is not a recording, so if she doesn't have screen-captured footage she should be in the clear.

My IANAL opinion is that if the cops don't find video evidence (ie obscene pornography), and didn't catch her in the act of running the simulation (assuming that making such a simulation is also illegal), then they have no case. How can you prove that code on a computer was used for an illegal purpose if there's no evidence of the alleged illegal act being performed? Perhaps an "intent to ___" law could be invoked instead, but my gut tells me that there's no law making "intent to use SexLab" illegal.

(but of course this is reddit so I also assume this story is fake)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"Absurd that you can't get good sweet rolls in this skeever hole" just hits different in this context

[-] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

Extremely rare American Revolution W

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Critical support to United States for beating up the Bri'ish over 200 years ago.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

we love our white-on-white crime

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Honestly didn't go nearly far enough, we should've invaded england-cool and killed all the nobility

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

One of the only things Amerikkka did right was shoot British soldiers

They did it for shit reasons, but they did kill Brits

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Let me guess, the mod in question just added a character that happened to be trans?

Or is it that modding is illegal in the UK?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

the UK has incredibly restrictive obscenity laws concerning pornography.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Every time I wonder where amerikkka gets it from, I look at ukkk LMAO.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

No it's a bestiality mod, where the player character is capable of engaging in sexual intercourse with animals. It is also a mod where the player can be the victim of sexual assault.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

So probably sexlab defeat and the creatures mods. Bestiality isn't my cup of tea, but it's near the top of the most downloaded list for a reason.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't have to hand it to them.....I don't have to hand it to them.....I don't have to hand it to them.... pika-cousin-suffering

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

OI YA CANT BEE AVIN DAT YOU EAR ME? ATS A LOAD A RUBBISH AT'S WA IH IS commits assault

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Refreshing lack of people siding with the cops ITT becsuse of the nature of the mods in question.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
136 points (100.0% liked)

games

20961 readers
206 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS