this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
136 points (100.0% liked)

games

20521 readers
143 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The mods in question were for having sex with literally anything that moves, including the animals

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Some lady wants her elf character to have crudely animated sex with a low-res Skyrim mammoth? Off to the Tower with you

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm fairly certain they have anti-bestiality laws over there. Which to me makes the other dude a snitch and a narc

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

normalize stitches for snitches

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's a bit of an interesting legal question IMO. If it's illegal to perform bestiality, that clearly doesn't make it illegal to simulate it, you would need a separate law or clause to cover that. If it's illegal to record bestiality, same thing - simply having the code on your computer to animate characters fucking is not a recording, so if she doesn't have screen-captured footage she should be in the clear.

My IANAL opinion is that if the cops don't find video evidence (ie obscene pornography), and didn't catch her in the act of running the simulation (assuming that making such a simulation is also illegal), then they have no case. How can you prove that code on a computer was used for an illegal purpose if there's no evidence of the alleged illegal act being performed? Perhaps an "intent to ___" law could be invoked instead, but my gut tells me that there's no law making "intent to use SexLab" illegal.

(but of course this is reddit so I also assume this story is fake)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

"Absurd that you can't get good sweet rolls in this skeever hole" just hits different in this context