102
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago

almost every member of the british media class should be executed without a trial

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

every member of the british ~~media class~~ should be executed without a trial

[-] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago

I like how elegantly many of the covers satisfy the editorial need to pair "inflammatory racist headline" and "hot babe".

there's something there for every configuration of stupid white guy: racist, horny, racist+horny, horny+racist.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago

Reminder that Starmer did a dodgy deal with right wing press to stop any potential press regulation in return for their support.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Could you provide some sources? Sounds quite interesting but I'm unable to find anything.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Starmer & Co have always been soft on trying to push media regulation, unlike Corbyn's admin and a number of the other smaller parties, but for quite some time they were still supporting a sort of soft opt-in approach: Example from Feb of this year

Then, when the election date was announced, suddenly all the media regulation policy proposals were absent from party materials and ministers wouldn't even answer questions on it: June exmaple

During the election campaign the Murdoch empire and others in the right wing press swang fully behind Labour for the first time since Blair. Everyone in media and politics circles were saying a deal was done to oppose any media regulation in exchange for their support.

Then in late July the iNewspaper (formerly Independent) officially ran the story that a deal had been agreed between senior Labour Party officials and at least Murdoch. That story is paywalled, but here's some more stories and analysis from the next day when the press started asking Labour if this was true and they repeatedly dodged the question and refused to deny it: 23rd July

[-] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

but then nobody would be incentivised to buy newspapers to invest in uh

papers rustling

extremely harmful editorialising? ok?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

in the same country as the staff of the BBC? i dont think thats a good idea

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Bri*ish Batboy Corporation

[-] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

I'm against immigrationbecause I think Africans and Syrians should have peace and prosperity at home

[-] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

I'm against the US orchestrated wars, sanctions, and economic vampirism which creates mass involuntary immigration.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Interesting how Giorgia Meloni was using this rhetoric, even going as far as to point out France's neocolonism. Of course, she didn't own up to Italy's role. But it's weird that they'll take up the anti-imperialist rhetoric to serve reactionary ends.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Bad bit. After the sins of colonialism europe has lost any right to restrict the movement of non europeans, non europeans still have that right. There should be no white people in Africa.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Rise of the racist right is useful to the liberal establishment

[-] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

Coming to an amerikkka near you!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Daily_mail.mp3

[-] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

I want to read the one about dentists being natural born killers

[-] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Notice how there's usually an attractive lady on the other side of the page

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Can't have the racist-lorry-driver without the awooga

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

needs nsfw tag

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

1984 is the best possible future for the UK

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
102 points (99.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13950 readers
682 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS