Using the term 'microaggression' is a microaggression against the most oppressed minority: rich, thin-skinned white boys.

https://youtu.be/vhFm62msNGc?t=8295 (excuse the video source, this is the best discussion I've heard about this issue as someone who's not a lawyer and going through the written reports)

Dude, if you need people to spell it out because you have zero object permanence: don't post Israeli or Zionist media about Hamas atrocities with dubious evidence. After Oct 7th the Zionist propaganda machine has been spinning in full force finding every fact, exaggeration, and fabrication they can to justify their brutal genocide of Palestinians. You don't remember all the Western news outlets promoting the lie that there was mass sexual assault of Israeli women, which the UN proved to be false? You remember Joe Biden saying he saw pictures of 40 beheaded babies which turned out to be a complete fabrication?

If there's a source that is credible and hasn't published Hasbara before, then maybe we could take it seriously, but if your sources are the BBC, AP, then 2 sources that are based inside of the Zionist entity then GTFO and go back to

249 years of genocide: I sleep

coming up on 250: RESIST FASCISM

I'm from a similar context, I don't consume Mexican media anymore but I grew up watching el Chavo del Ocho. Also had Mexican friends and teachers growing up.

Maybe in Spain and Argentina? Everywhere else, ustedes is the default. The formal vs informal distinction is only for the singular tú vs usted (and tuteo is getting more and more common over time so tú is also becoming the default).

We got ustedes and vosotros!

@[email protected] was looking at the Satisfactory subreddit and saw these comments, had me with some whiplash

the slopleeeer

Nice to meet one of my fans. Truly, it was an honor to make the other 9.

Liberalism is itself not practical (liberal ideology taken to the rational extreme of practicality and efficiency is just fascism) so the trick is to become selectively aware of the fact your worldview means nothing can ever change when people want to change something you like. I mean, seriously, apply her thought process to any political issue.

Trans rights in 2005? Oh, sorry, it's hopelessly impractical and because most women don't support trans rights we'd just be alienating them; we need to be practical and compromise with the transphobes so we can get things done.

Climate change? Degrowth and net zero is not a practical path, it's simply never gonna happen. Most car owners don't support mass transit so these utopian urbanist ideas are just shrinking the coalition. The left has once again chosen a doomed cause.

Socialism? Worker ownership of the means of production isn't realistic. Most shareholders and landlords just don't support taking their property away. The left needs to let go of these tangential issues that have no future.