The Enshittification continues. Slightly better than Google because you can at least turn it off, but still on by default! Turn that shit off if you use DDG!

all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 64 points 2 years ago (3 children)

NO ONE FUCKING ASKED FOR ANY OF THIS SHIT

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago

    It was never for you, the user. Like any advertising company, DuckDuckGo wants to reduce the cost of predicting what products its user will buy, which, at this point, means harvesting your thoughts and asking an AI model what you will buy, even if you've already left.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    That rate of profit do be declining. I forget what pod was talking about it, but they were saying that tech execs think this will be what returns them to the good old days of high profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, it's already inaccurate

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    It is very cool that we are not only using a lot more energy to fuel this shit, but also that entire energy networks are being overloaded to do it.

    Look forward to rolling brownouts in order to keep faulty search results and terrible images coming.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Unironically, I've been getting better search results from Yandex since this AI dogshit started picking up steam. I'm contemplating switching over full time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's great too

    I switched to searx and it's actually perfect

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How do you make sure that results actually appear? I'll be using a public instance with certain engines, and then those engines break and I either have to switch instances or engines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    What kind of violence is theoretically possible against ai infrastructure right now, asking for myself

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Find a random data centre, break in, and start hitting servers with a hammer. Sooner or later you're bound to knock out an ai one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Another useless fucking chatbot

  • source
  • I use startpage. It's been pretty nice, it feels like old Google.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    The AI chat is helpful though

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    please demonstrate a case where this has been useful to you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

    I asked it the difference between soy sauce and tamari and it told me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    and what part of that required an AI?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    I never said it did. It was just faster than searching through multiple search results and reading through multiple paragraphs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    How did you know the answer was correct?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children)

    How do you know any information is correct?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Do you really not see why I asked my rhetorical question or do you just want to bicker?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wasn't bickering. You're the one trying to argue. It sounds like you're implying that information from AI is inherently incorrect which simply isn't true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm probably going to wind up paying for Kagi soon. One more monthly tax to make the internet halfway usable again

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment