▲ 119 ▼ DuckDuckGo is serving AI garbage now (hexbear.net) submitted 2 years ago by drinkinglakewater@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments The Enshittification continues. Slightly better than Google because you can at least turn it off, but still on by default! Turn that shit off if you use DDG!
[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) How did you know the answer was correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children) How do you know any information is correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Do you really not see why I asked my rhetorical question or do you just want to bicker? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I wasn't bickering. You're the one trying to argue. It sounds like you're implying that information from AI is inherently incorrect which simply isn't true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago* First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children) How do you know any information is correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Do you really not see why I asked my rhetorical question or do you just want to bicker? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I wasn't bickering. You're the one trying to argue. It sounds like you're implying that information from AI is inherently incorrect which simply isn't true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago* First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Do you really not see why I asked my rhetorical question or do you just want to bicker? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I wasn't bickering. You're the one trying to argue. It sounds like you're implying that information from AI is inherently incorrect which simply isn't true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago* First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I wasn't bickering. You're the one trying to argue. It sounds like you're implying that information from AI is inherently incorrect which simply isn't true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago* First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago* First, at the risk of being a pedant, bickering and arguing are distinct activities. Second, I didn't imply llm's results are inherently incorrect. However, it is undeniable that they sometimes make shit up. Thus without other information from a more trustworthy source, an LLM's outputs can't be trusted. permalink fedilink source parent