109
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 67 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That was my first thought too but apparently it's ceramic 3D printing (the only ceramic printers I've seen are like $MM). I wonder how that can possibly scale to be as cheap as what mossy earth is doing by epoxying sand onto a metal frame and metal twist tying coral fragments onto it.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

there are burn filaments for ceramic (and metal) i believe, so they are porous, but pure ceramic after burnout (they have like 30% plastic/70% ceramic, plastic is burnt out at like 700c or something and leaves ceramic/metal part*), and can be printed with cheap 3d printers

*with lots of holes in it, so not structurally sound, but here it's not important and probably even desirable.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Yep that's correct, with ceramic you don't end up with any plastic in the final product. I'm more familiar with SLA ceramic printers which use a resin, and FDM metal printing that uses a kind of wax, also burned out in a tube furnace.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I more meant that ceramic 3d printing is not automatically $mm, at least after journalism word converter, it can mean just ceramic fdm mass-friendly approach.

although from 2019 i found they (maybe different they?) used something like cornstarch filament, even friendlier i assume (https://www.udel.edu/udaily/2019/october/3D-printed-coral-study-damselfish-Danielle-Dixson/)

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Gotcha, yeah unfortunately FDM ceramic still has crazy high spool costs so I don't think it really puts it into the same ballpark as using simpler materials. We're talking like $500 a spool, just one printed piece like you see in the picture looks like it would take an entire spool or more and could be the better part of $1K. I'm comparing to Mossy Earth's strategy of binding together metal rods and coating with sand, which after labor lands at $26 per structure.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Having lots of holes is a crucial part of reef structures. It provides surface area for more things to live in

[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago

Oh look, it comes pre-bleached to blend in seamlessly with the reefs of the future doomer

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago

I can't imagine a more depressing job (volunteer work?) than being the people trying to save the reef. Truly Sisyphian.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hate how we will do literally everything but the politics necessary to solve the problems we face as a species.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

This is how we keep selling coal!

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

good thing we have this AI picture of whatever it is they're doing

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

More microplastic for the ocean

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Eh, all that primary productivity from the zooxanthellae is probably just decorative.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

day by day we get more efficient distributing microplastics

this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
109 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13867 readers
850 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS