top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 2 years ago (5 children)

wtf is a catholic hospital? you get wine and crackers while you wait in purgatory?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They add indulgence cost to your hospital bill

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Many hospitals are owned by the Catholic Church and are a huge source of income.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 94 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Perhaps Catholic institutions shouldn't be forced to perform actions against their beliefs, but then they don't get to use the word "hospital" in relation to whatever their building does.

    I feel this should apply to pharmacies too. If you want to have pharmacists that can deny you valid prescriptions from your doctor, then they don't get to call that building a "pharmacy". Just like cigarettes there should be a large lettered warning on the door to the establishment informing you that the person inside has indicated they will deny you a prescription if they feel like it. If the pharmacists want to exercise their moral discretion, they don't get to use the word "pharmacy" for whatever building/business they're doing it in.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 65 points 2 years ago

    If y our religion dictates that you not perform life saving procedures, Then you have no business being in medicine.

  • source
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I simply don't want religious anything that is essential services.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They’re just hospitals. In fact they’re the biggest group of non-profit hospitals in the country. They are generally speaking a very good thing. The main problem as discussed here is their restrictions on reproductive care, which is a huge problem and should not be allowed. It isn’t even like to be employed there you must be Catholic, or even Christian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Religious hospitals? What will they think of next!

    At least in countries that charge patients money for their healthcare, these religious hospitals are free, right? Given how much money Christianity makes in donations, and given that their whole religion is all about helping others for nothing in return and without judgement, it would make sense they'd run free hospitals providing healthcare for all, no matter their situation ♥️

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    I don't want religious institutions near healthcare. Imposing attitudes of abstinence only moral puritanism on others. Thats not medicine. Like the WHO said 7 almost 8 years ago drug use needs to be globally decriminalized to remove attitudes of discrimination from health care settings. And at the time then nobody foresaw roe v wade being knocked back and turning the clock of social progress back 5/6 decades+ i wish j could say things cant get any worde but they can and they will. So we don’t need the people making things worse involved in the administration of medical care. We already have too many religious bigots with hoarded wealth whispering in the ear of the dumbest moron on the planet who has control of the nuclear football. And healthcare is already bastardized by the incentives of shareholder profits and the vultures of the for profit insurance industry whos sole purpose is tk deny people adequate health care to boost profits whenever possible so lets not shove religion down the throats of people who are often denied basic dignities.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    If abortion is an option, it is the only option worth considering.

    The only kids who should be carried to term are the ones that have been planned and prepared for.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I rotated through a Catholic hospital while getting my degree in genetic counseling. Our whole job was to give women with pregnancies at high risk of genetic conditions all the information they needed to make an informed decision on how they want to move forward, and we weren't even allowed to mention the option of abortion. I was very glad when that rotation was over.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    I would really like to see someone who is getting their degree or license push back on the requirement to rotate through a religious hospital, on the grounds that it violates the religious freedoms of the students.

    If we’re going to have unconstitutional religious freedom laws, we may as well try and use them against our oppressors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Reclassify abortion as an exorcism, get a priest chanting some Latin during the procedure and done.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    How come 90% of these twitter screenshots I see on lemmy are all just witty comebacks to fake opinions that nobody actually holds? This is like those "feminist gets rekt with facts and logic" compilation videos on youtube, but for liberals. Poking fun at strawmen every once in a while is entertaining, but it gets old really quickly.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is a 100% real opinion a lot of people hold.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nevermind, I think you're right. I was confused by the term "catholic hospital", but I looked it up and apparently a lot of hospitals around the world really do have a religious affiliations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    a woman i nannied for almost died giving birth to both of her sons. when she had the second one, she asked them to tie her tubes while they were doing the c section and they refused due to their religious policies. she had to fully recover from the birth and then find a doctor who would do the procedure, then had to recover again from that surgery.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think we should also force chuck e cheese to perform abortions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If they don't want to perform particular procedures based on their faith then they can call themseves a "Western Faith Therapy Centre"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    A hospital is just a building and the organization that owns the building.

    The real question is, should hospitals be allowed to force or forbid doctors from providing medical care?

    A doctor (Catholic or not) should never, and can never, be forced to perform a medical procedure, including abortions. And they also shouldn't be forbidden from performing a medical procedure.

    Hospitals just provide rooms and equipment so that doctors can provide the care that their patients need, within their ability to provide that care.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "do no harm, unless it violated your specific religious ideology" that's how the oath goes right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    This is really it. If a doctor has a moral objection to abortions, maybe gynecology wasn't the right discipline for them to practice. That's on them, and they should be upfront about it being a personal moral objection and for them to seek another doctor.

    I'm fine with that compromise, because I suspect those doctors are and will remain the minority, and everyone's rights are preserved.

    But if a chief of medicine, or worse, a board of non-doctors, says their hospital won't perform abortions on religious grounds? Then fuck you, you're not a hospital, you are a faith-based healing center, and need to be treated as such.

    Hospital administration needs to be science-based care and check their religion at the door, especially if they aren't directly practicing. They shouldn't be making decisions that directly effect people that they are indirectly related to based upon someone's interpretation of an old anthology of fables.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    That's fine. Just don't expect to keep your medical license as you sit around doing nothing as people die of preventable deaths.

    If you're a doctor, your job is to save lives. If you intentionally fail to do that job it shouldn't be your job.

    If a fireman refused to put out a fire because they didn't feel like it, they'd be lose their job too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We have a Catholic hospital here in the city where I live in Ontario. Being publicly funded makes what they do different from the American ones, but despite doing women's health and obstetrics they don't do tubal ligation unless it's approved by their board, so even if you had a planned c section and were planning on having your tubal during the procedure, if you had to have your c section on an emergency basis because you labour early, they won't do it. It's so fucked up. It's a good hospital but come on. It's 2025, most Catholics use birth control. If you don't want to do abortions, fine, but a tubal during a c section is really just saving someone a second surgery.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Plus it's probably way easier for them to fuck kids at a Chuck E. Cheese. Actually it's probably easier at the hospitals but the supply is larger at the Chuck E. Cheese.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Rather not, I'd be worried they'd "fuck up" on purpose.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›