[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Tldr but I'm going to guess the reason (along with the huge number of bugs windows seems to be getting right now) is their current strategy of vibe coding slop into everything

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Thanks! Given the system the US uses for party primaries and the current climate of public manipulation through captured mainstream and social media, aren't those things already problems? Would it be any worse than it already is?

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

I think the reduction would be slight versus the reduction realised by improving the quality of existing human operated public transport like buses and trains. A mass transit system relying on individual automated cars is a tech bro brain fart.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah it would be better still if we we had actual improved public transport systems for carry more people at once rather than automated personal vehicles, even if those automated personal vehicles are shared like taxis. The cost of automation and requirement for removing all other vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists and animals from the roads is immediately removed and the benefits obtained by reducing traffic is immediately realised just by using human driven buses and trains.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 5 points 4 days ago

Why would it reduce traffic volume? The cars that are on the road are the ones that are currently in their hour of driving that day, it would more reduce the size of parking lots and parking space allocation, or at least move it to charging hubs away from where people congregate.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

ELI5 does this even matter? The state legislators are elected by the people, why does it matter if those reps are electing the federal senators or the the people directly? Its not like you're going to get a bunch of lords nominated arbitrarily by the ~~King~~President?

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago

I don't know that FlashMobOfOne needs to just apply a dystopian tv show to the only possibility of how they see it playing out. Other ideas are a thing, particularly if they are 100% signing up. Would they still 100% sign up if the copy gets the digital immortality but FlashMobOfOne still has to live on in their own skull regardless? If that's the case why bother? You'd effectively create another person that is based on you but isn't you, they'd think of themselves as you, but OEM hardware would probably still hold the rights to the title.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Ahh so the idea would be that the upload wipes the original so there arent multiple copies kicking around.

Seems like making new people would be difficult unless you made everyone keep a bio body until they had reached mental maturity and made more humans ..

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 7 points 6 days ago

The digital immortality you want: living forever in a virtual paradise.

The digital immortality you get: you are recorded doing something stupid that ends any career or relationship potential and is never able to be removed from the internet.

In another aspect, what does uploading ones self look like and when is the upload taken? Do they kill the original body after taking the upload or is there a you living out their days stuck in the mortal husk while another you (possibly not the one you are) is off living it up in an immortal body or virtual paradise?

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

It's like trying to fix a knife wound by putting a sign next to the wound saying no infections allowed rather than doing something about the knife welding maniac ..

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago

They are referred to as settlers, I assume that comes from the translation of what they call themselves in Hebrew? Do the Palestinians refer to the places the Israeli settlers move to as colonies or their own towns as colonies? Not sure the Palestinians can colonies something they've lived in for hundreds of years? Is this also a translation issue?

12
24

Some pretty salient points from Malcolm Turnbull. Morrisons shit subramine deal is going to haunt us for decades to come.

I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt that by patriotism he means a focus on serving our country rather than the nationalism it tends be associated with. I'm not a huge fan of Turnbull but he has always been pretty well spoken.

I think his idea that the Liberal party are good economic managers died about 25 years ago with Howard. It could be argued they've always been shit at economics, just noone called them out on it in the old days. I agree that they should be pushing back to the centre of they want to deal with Hanson's racist arsehole party.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 204 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sadly telling someone with baby brain that they are stupid and have a baby brain isn't going to help them change. Baby's don't learn like that. We need to sing them songs and make learning fun until they have a leap and want to learn more all by themselves. Also cutting their screen time to zero until their brains develop well into toddler brain is supposed to be super beneficial.

26
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Lodespawn@aussie.zone to c/worldnews@aussie.zone

It's wild how much better Clinton is at speaking than Trump. Also crazy that they're the same age.

27

Probably safe to assume that by housing affordability he means affordability of mansions and by cutting red tape he's referring to getting rid of regulations stopping him from sucking up whats left of the Murray Darling..

view more: next ›

Lodespawn

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago