The one enriching themselves the most at the greater social expense to others. It's pretty clear which group is doing that.
Being open or closed about their corruption is more about strategy than actual corruption.
The cops should have access to a legal expert when they have a legal question. Arguably the cops should also be trained in the laws they need to uphold and all aspects of their position in the legal process, particularly for those cops holding rank. I would be surprised if this wasn't already the case. Each individuals capability to understand and correctly interpret what they've been trained in probably varies ..
I can only delete windows so many times .. sadly my work won't let me delete the install on my work laptop
If the output is different every time, even subtly, then the overarching system is non-deterministic. If you need to rely on the output to be accurate either for safety, reliability, liability or any combination of the three then it must be verified by every time and your benefit in not using the human that can actually be held accountable for the output is severely limited.
Oh yeah, this clown definitely sounds smart and socially competent enough to be an effective police officer.
One of the engineers I used to work with started his career in South Africa 80s/90s building microwave bearer sites, he said if they didn't finish the site lock down and liven up the wave guide before they left for the weekend then when they got back on Monday all of the copper waveguide would have been stripped from the tower.
In a totally unrelated case, when they were building a new extension to the rail system here in my home town they also had to liven up each section of the overhead power feeder each day or a member of one of the local outlaw motorcycle gangs would turn up in the middle of the night, cut the weights and haul the cable onto the back of a ute.
I think there is still a significant issue with accountability and accuracy.
Are they more or less accurate than a trained human legal expert? Maybe equivalent, but they're non-deterministic so will frequently have different answers to the same question asked at different times. They will typically bull ahead with incorrect information rather than output that they're unsure and need to investigate which you would expect a human expert to say.
LLMs also have no accountability so all decisions must be verified by an accountable expert. Given the time it takes to read and absorb a potentially wrong advice, and given you need to ask the legal expert anyway, you might as well ask the expert in the first instance.
More corrupt? They don't seem like a good party focused on representing their constituents, but I think more corrupt is a bit of a stretch ..
Or cocaine .. but why not both?
You could write letters and emails to your federal and state representatives expressing your opinions on this subject? Hell you could even send them links to the site from this post and sites like it. Then you could also help your friends and family come to the same opinion as you and help them write their own letters and emails.
Who cares? Do you also find people who have in-person conversations in coffee shops insufferable? Or people who take phone calls?