[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

The cops should have access to a legal expert when they have a legal question. Arguably the cops should also be trained in the laws they need to uphold and all aspects of their position in the legal process, particularly for those cops holding rank. I would be surprised if this wasn't already the case. Each individuals capability to understand and correctly interpret what they've been trained in probably varies ..

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

I can only delete windows so many times .. sadly my work won't let me delete the install on my work laptop

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

If the output is different every time, even subtly, then the overarching system is non-deterministic. If you need to rely on the output to be accurate either for safety, reliability, liability or any combination of the three then it must be verified by every time and your benefit in not using the human that can actually be held accountable for the output is severely limited.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

Oh yeah, this clown definitely sounds smart and socially competent enough to be an effective police officer.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 7 points 8 hours ago

I think there is still a significant issue with accountability and accuracy.

Are they more or less accurate than a trained human legal expert? Maybe equivalent, but they're non-deterministic so will frequently have different answers to the same question asked at different times. They will typically bull ahead with incorrect information rather than output that they're unsure and need to investigate which you would expect a human expert to say.

LLMs also have no accountability so all decisions must be verified by an accountable expert. Given the time it takes to read and absorb a potentially wrong advice, and given you need to ask the legal expert anyway, you might as well ask the expert in the first instance.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 22 points 2 days ago

Or cocaine .. but why not both?

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 11 points 3 days ago

You could write letters and emails to your federal and state representatives expressing your opinions on this subject? Hell you could even send them links to the site from this post and sites like it. Then you could also help your friends and family come to the same opinion as you and help them write their own letters and emails.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

The whole EATCS radiates 70kW, so less than one modern data centre rack. Helpful!

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah I'll pay that, you can't radiate it effectively enough for data centre applications though.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 5 points 5 days ago

I'm not saying the space data centres are a good or even viable idea, just saying you can improve the reliability significantly if you try. The space data centre planis a non starter, there's nowhere for the heat to go.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 12 points 5 days ago

There's a bunch of sealed underwater data centres and they found reliability went right up (see Project Natick). Underwater has the benefit of actually having cooling though ..

12
24

Some pretty salient points from Malcolm Turnbull. Morrisons shit subramine deal is going to haunt us for decades to come.

I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt that by patriotism he means a focus on serving our country rather than the nationalism it tends be associated with. I'm not a huge fan of Turnbull but he has always been pretty well spoken.

I think his idea that the Liberal party are good economic managers died about 25 years ago with Howard. It could be argued they've always been shit at economics, just noone called them out on it in the old days. I agree that they should be pushing back to the centre of they want to deal with Hanson's racist arsehole party.

26
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Lodespawn@aussie.zone to c/worldnews@aussie.zone

It's wild how much better Clinton is at speaking than Trump. Also crazy that they're the same age.

27

Probably safe to assume that by housing affordability he means affordability of mansions and by cutting red tape he's referring to getting rid of regulations stopping him from sucking up whats left of the Murray Darling..

view more: next ›

Lodespawn

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago