It's impressive they built a whole window while arguing

I think the microscope got an erection over the "anti" stealing the cure

Lol they aren't thinking about where it will go, they are think about making fat stacks off the labour of others. No the companies aren't making any money, but the people involved certainly are. When those companies fail those people won't be held accountable and they will keep most of the money they've extracted from the system.

That lady's big bird costume sucks

Those researchers are now on the magpie naughty list and will be swooped at every available opportunity.

Optting out will just result in generic, untargeted ads, doesn't everyone want ads targeted to them specifically?! Don't we all just love ads?!? Everyone loves ads right? Especially when they are tailored specifically to you right?! So personal, what else could anyone want from anything?

Nice!

sun (lower case s) is a star at the centre of a planetary system. Given all the letters are capitalised in the post and all the first letters of each word are capitalised in the song title (as is done with titles), and given Chris Cornell is dead, we'll never know if he was referring to our Sun or a sun. Also our star's name is Sol.

I see what your saying. It's a broad concept but the process for professional recognition can accommodate that. The topic at question is how do we ensure engineers are ethical in how they operate and professional registration and protection of the role along with the assurances that go with that are a good way to achieve it. I know in law in Australia you must be registered with the local law regulator to practice and members must adhere to strict ethical standards. If you are reported and found to be breach those standards you will not be able to practice any more. Meanwhile engineers are polluting and building weapons ad nauseum with limited repercussions. Engineers are held accountable in most regions legally but laws usually apply to safety, not building/designing unethical things.

So I find the UK a good example of how professional registration can be done well. Each discipline has an organisation that handles chartership specific to that discipline. The IET does a lot of lifting for all things electrical, including communications/telecoms, but I believe they would cover some software engineering depending on what your focus was. BCS, CISec or IfSE would likely cover most software engineering.

My experience tends to be with the IET. They are internationally recognised and have branches in a lot of countries. If you have no local support within your company they will connect you with an existing chartered member in your field who can help with advice and chartership application review. I know with Engineers Australia you can migrate your chartership from the IET to Engineers Australia without too much difficulty. Engineers Australia is a single organisation for all disciplines which is then open to the issues you mention. The UK orgs are all regulated by the engineering council which manages a consistent specification for all orgs to hold their members to, the orgs then review applications specific to the discipline against the requirements of the spec.

Unrelated discipline? Why would you claim to be an engineer if your work was not related to engineering?

Tony's chocolonley?

I switched to obsidian and haven't looked back. It doesn't appear to have stylus input in the core application (I don't need that), but it does look like there are a couple of community plugins that enable the support. Not sure how good they are though.