The output technically belongs to the AI company, does the first amendment apply to non human entities? If it does I don't think anyone should be supporting that application ..

Not sure freedom to use apps is included in the US Constitution ..

Nice story, thanks!

AI can't replace lawyers and doctors, but they can automate their paperwork and free up time for them to do other things.

The problem with this statement is that lawyers and doctors have to be able to assure their work. If they are wrong then there are consequences. If you have to spend time reviewing everything an LLM writes, even just for paperwork, along with all its sources, then the benefit of using it tends to being on par with rather than a benefit. When you add in the issues with personal skill decline it becomes a detriment.

I also wonder about the statement on AI companies being profitable. There was a report recently talking about how very few companies were realising benefits from their AI spend, with many also finding they were spending a lot more on it than they had planned to not realise those benefits. Are those companies going to continue to spend, particularly when the article talks about AI companies needing to charge more.

I probably looked up some stuff on the web first, but then IRC, a lot of IRC..

Now do one for Schumer, also keep doing this one ..

Sorry, rock storage? I .. what?

I prefer this version

BitchX was probably first ..

In Australia unleaded is about USD6.85 a gallon diesel is more like USD8.75 a gallon ..

Wasn't the trout thing a pIRCh thing? Or maybe it's just that I used pIRCh before mIRC

I think the connected wires would vaporise before those tracks ..