415
Sean 'Diddy' Combs hit with a wave of 120 new sexual assault allegations
(www.nbcnews.com)
"I don’t know if you know this, but Puff is an investor in Twitter,' [Musk] said, using a nickname for Combs," Mac and Conger recount. "'You know, he’s a good friend of mine. We text a lot."
Oh look, another reason to not use Shitter and also to loathe Musk. I do love adding them to my mental list.
Not surprising, though. Musk has that kind of vibe.
bout to be a class action against this vile pos gahdamn
Gonna get a check for 2 hours of his life in the mail.
That’s more than I make in a month.
Oh not his earnings, his sentence time.
The victims will get a check for two hours of his sentence time?
Everything I hear about him continues to get worse.
I haven't heard anything about other celebrities going down for this, but there's gotta be. Is this gonna turn out like Epstein where they pretend like it was all him and nobody else knew or helped him?
I’m going to be so happy when people stop talking about this degenerate rapist and he just rots into obscurity in a cold dark prison.
I don't know. I would imagine some of his songs will be played for a long time. Hopefully, no one plays this song for Diddy himself...
Edit: Also, it's kind of funny his most important song is just a cover.
Just a few more accusers and he'll have a gross. I think that's when the bulk rate trial discount kicks in.
The article said 3000 people had some forward but they are only filing 120 suits right now. More to come. I’d say Diddy is gross. 😬
Even if only 5% of those are legit, that’s unfathomable to me. Yikes.
Worse, it's 120 per each name he's used so it's more like 120,000.
Blood. In. The. Water.
Breaking news: "Sean Combs announced as the new starting quarterback for the Cleveland Browns".
He really should have learned to surf, then these waves of allegations would be no problem.
Strength in numbers, now is the time for everyone to come forward, they can't miss the king now, he is going down.
I don't get the hesitation for these victims to bring this up before now. Sure, right when it happened it could be tough to come forward, but you sit on this info all the way through the Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Eppstein, #MeToo era? Why would you do that when you know it's still happening to other people?
fear
Precisely. Imagine someone doing something to you that you do not want, something that takes away your sense of autonomy, something that humiliates you. You know if you say something, some people will accuse YOU of doing something wrong, instead of your attacker. Now imagine that person has tons of money, and through that money tons of power. You know if you say anything about being attacked, it could hurt that person, and that person will use their money and power to make your life harder. You also know that even if everything goes best case scenario, it will be terribly hard, humiliating, and your personal life (and maybe some of your own behavior) will be out there for everyone to see. Then, think of all the ways it could be a worse outcome. I don't fault anyone for not coming forward. If I were a target for this behavior, I'd like to think that I would fight, but who knows what I would actually do. I hope I never have to find out.
He blew up Kid Cudi's car. He is a famous person. He tried to kill him and we're only learning about it now. As just regular people, they chose the safer option, you can't be mad at that.
Wild. “could not escape” him & his network, one victim said.
Jesus
In case you are serious, almost everyone that was with him at the start died mysteriously or was shot and he's the prime suspect for ordering both tupac and big's deaths.
Why would you do that when you know it’s still happening to other people?
I love living in a country where the police have no duty to protect others, but the victims of crimes do.
How will the police, or anyone else, know about the crimes if no one reports them?
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
415 points (99.5% liked)
News
37194 readers
1986 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS