JonsJava

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

"I never consent to searches"

"I don't answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?"

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

Caught me on my lunch break, and this is a community I love lurking in.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Fair point. I'll restore the comments and remove the ban

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I was the one that submitted the ban, after a number of reports. On the face of it (I am at work, so don't always have time to deep dive), The reports did seem to align with trolling.

I had/have no idea what's going on withe the Jordan Lund thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

My gut says he's going to use the ethics in government act as an excuse to dump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Crossover:

1 with 3

2 with 6

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not as much as you'd think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm another mod of the community. Admiral didn't let me know they were doing this.

I still 100% support their actions regardless.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it's a bug, wow. Almost 250 years, and they can't fix it?

Also, judges are there to make sure both sides play by the rules.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

It's actually the conclusion of 2 things:

  • Double Jeopardy means your cannot try someone twice for the same crime
  • A juror cannot be held accountable for a decision they make

If both hold true, then logically, a jury can make a decision against legal precedent, without fear of repercussion - unless they are paid/coerced to come to that conclusion, and the defendant - once cleared by by a jury - cannot be tried again.

This means that legally, a jury can say GTFO to jury instructions set by judges.

[–] [email protected] 196 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Jury nullification is an important logical conclusion of American jurist rules. This post will stay up.

 

A woman named Laura McCaskill used an Apple AirTag to track down her stolen Harris/Walz campaign sign, which led her to a home in Nixa, Missouri. When confronted, the young man's mother admitted that the signs in the trunk of the car belonged to her son, who she described as "just an idiot."

The incident involved the theft of around 60 signs from various homes in the neighborhood. McCaskill and other residents plan to file police reports, and McCaskill expressed concern about the entitlement and lack of accountability shown by the young man and his mother. The document also discusses the legal implications of stealing campaign signs, referencing Missouri Statute 115.637 which classifies such actions as a misdemeanor offense.

7
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19612227

Hello world!

as the title says the server is BACK! It is hosted under a new server! The same map and your inventory is the same!

Domain is the same: minecraft.lemmy.world

Bedrock: minecraft.lemmy.world:1027

Please note: The new server is hosted in the USA so if you are joining from the EU please expect higher than before ping! This can not be avoided as the generous hoster doesnt have a server in the EU.

The generous hoster is @[email protected], thanks to him all this is possible.

The home limits are increased and there will be for everyone who wants it a new spawn where you can build from.

Thanks everyone
Rooki

 

Please post articles related to the debate here. New posts about the debate will be removed as duplicates.

Discussions are welcome and encouraged!

 

The news mod team has asked to no longer be a part of the project until we have a composite tool that polls multiple sources for a more balanced view.

It will take a few hours, but FOR NOW there won't be a bot giving reviews of the source.

The goal was simple: make it easier to show biased sources. This was to give you and the mods a better view of what we were looking at.

The mod team is in agreement: one source of truth isn't enough. We are working on a tool to give a composite score, from multiple sources, all open source.

view more: next ›