They were all dating the same 14-year-old.
His actual, stated defense was that sexual deviancy is directed at only one sex, and since he is attracted to women (while the victim was a boy) he can't possibly be a sexual abuser. We've actually finally hit something that is so illogical even Republicans can't support it.
I was talking to my mom's tax preparer a couple of months ago. He was telling me how his $30K/month software system went down this year and fucked up his whole business (which was why he had to file extensions for all of his clients) and I told him how that was probably because of AI and vibe coding. He then launched into a diatribe about how great AI is which was hilarious by itself, but then he started telling me about how he had invested in some dude's "reactionless space drive" because the dude had solved all of his problems with this "technology" by using ChatGPT. I don't think I've ever had a professional convince me that quickly to use someone else.
Wat. Rifling dates to the 16th Century. It was just prohibitively expensive before the mid-1800s so most troops were equipped with smoothbore muskets.
My sister-in-laws parents were washing their ground beef. Not like, in the plastic wrapping or anything semi-sane like that. They were taking the ground beef out of its package and washing it with soap and water.
your vexillologous ditty is dubious
It only applies to Germany.
My favorite is the Deadpool reaction shorts. Like, you don't even get a face.
I mean, in the age of muskets and field cannons they didn't really shoot at anybody in particular since the guns were not very accurate. They probably did try to hit the bagpipe dudes, though.
It helps a bit if you toast them. That's what the "pop" part means.
Dude has an iron-clad defense, though. Said it's only abuse if the child is the same sex and he likes women/girls. I really wish I were making that up.
Edit: wow, I actually totally misunderstood his absurd defense. He actually said "sexual deviancy is directed towards one sex rather than two" and since he's attracted to women (when the victim here was a boy) he can't possibly be a sex offender. I think we've finally found something so far gone that even MAGAts can't support it.
view more:
next ›