this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
538 points (96.9% liked)

News

23259 readers
2695 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • The Harris campaign is showing new strength in must-win states ahead of the party's convention.
  • In Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Harris leads Trump 50% to 46% among likely voters.
  • It's a reflection of the continued reset of the 2024 race after Biden's exit.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Enthusiasm wins elections, because people actually take the time to go VOTE. It’s amazing how few people actually do!

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Also voting is the one thing those bastard pig fascist bootlicking simp conservative chud SCUM don't want us all to do. You can tell because of how much outrageous effort they dump into making voting more difficult. So: fuck 'em. They can eat shit.

It's not even that I like the democrat party at all.

I just want the republicans to lose. Fuck them in hell for eternity.

Bonus; If the GOP gets curbstomped into oblivion where it belongs (with the Federalist party) then the democrats won't be able to say "well at least we're not republicans!" anymore.

Imagine uncle sam standing before the behaded corpse of an fat frumpy anthropomorphic elephant, still holding a big bloody machete and smiling at an anthropomorphic donkey.

"Oh, you're not like him? Why, Yes, You'd better 'be like him' as little as possible if you don't want to end up like he did too!"

The democrats only get away with their fuckery because they always hide behind their favorite token excuse.

They still delusionally think the republicans are their pet controlled opposition.

That pet is not controlled. It is entirely OUT of control, a danger to everyone, both completely feral and RABID.

It's time for America to take that violent, deranged, savage animal out to Kristi Noem's gravel pit and end its life right before its democrat "owner"s' eyes. If we make an example of the republicans, the cowardly shits in the centrist party will either see the light or flee.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter!

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don’t care - vote. 🗳️

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It is possibly to do both

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vote! Complacency loses every time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I'm so happy this message is making it's way to the top

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It needs to not be close. Biden was polling way ahead in 2020 but he only won effectively by like 85k votes. Yes, he got 7 million more votes total but in the closest states that could have seen him lose, only about 85k people was the difference between Biden winning the presidency vs Trump winning.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (2 children)

2020 was decided by even less than that! Closer to 43,000 votes across Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin.

It needs to become a nation-wide single-issue to revamp our campaign finance and election system.

That means abolishing the Electoral College and FPTP, addressing Gerrymandering, implementing ranked choice voting, and publicly-funded elections. This is the only way we fix our democracy at the root of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

A path only open by Republicans losing this election, which is a critical point that can't be missed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Crazy idea: How about the person who gets the most votes wins?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

yOu MeAn MoB rUlEs?!?1?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

First past the post isn't a good system, no.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago

Vote like your and your loved ones' lives depends on it, because they probably do.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago

Let's make sure the ballot box reflects that. Vote, get active, and get involved. Even if you don't live in a swing state, the down ballot races matter far more than you think

Find how to register to vote for where you are

Find opportunities to volunteer for stuff around you

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (5 children)

In Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Harris leads Trump 50% to 46% among likely voters.

That's within the margin of error. That doesn't really count as a lead.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago

No, but Trump's leads were also within the margin of error, so it's encouraging to see a swing, even if it might just be noise.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

She’s only been campaigning for a few weeks. The DNC hasn’t even happened yet. I would call this pretty phenomenal.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Jfc people went ape shit when 1-2% was called within the margin of error a few days ago and now folks complain when it isn’t called out at 4% lmao

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most people have a really, really awful understanding of how statistics work.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Preach.

Yes it’s all margin of error. But what I’m seeing personally is Biden was consistently 2-4% down (conservatively) in every state that mattered (which was within the margin of error) and Harris is up 2-4% in every state that matters now (which is also within the margin of error).

I’d rather be the Harris campaign right now than the (now defunct) Biden or (panicking) Trump campaigns. Qualify it all you want folks 🤷‍♂️

No I’m not complacent. I’m excited to vote.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We don't know the sample size; so we don't know the margin of error.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I mean, click a couple links and it's right there

MI: 619 PA: 693 WI: 661 All of registered voters

Using the amount of total registered voters in each respective state and a 95% CI, we get the following margins of error MI: ±3.939% PA: ±3.723% WI: ±3.811%

Depending on the exact lead (NYT only shows round percents, not specific numbers for each response), all of those are potentially within the top end of that margin of error.

Am I trying to claim that a swing from being down by ~4% to being up by ~4% means nothing and is indicative of nothing? Of course not. But man, most people really do not at all understand how statistics work, and I really wish people would stop talking out of their ass about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So which links did you click? The one that goes to NYT is paywalled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It was paywalled for me 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It’s easy. When Kamala is down we say that polls don’t matter as much they used to, but when she’s up polls are obviously right. The margin of error is just a thing we use after the fact to justify whether the polls are useless (Kamala losing) or absolutely correct (Kamala winning)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If I remember this correctly, the square of the error for the sum of (or difference between) two independent measurements is the sum of the squares of the individual errors. Gauss something.

That would make the error for the 8 point swing be sqrt(2×3.8²) or about 5.4. So at least the swing is significant in each state.

Also, the error for the average of 3 variables is sqrt(e1²+e2²+e3²)/3 or 2.2 so the average lead in the 3 states is significant.

But we can't make a significant claim about the lead in each state.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I love how any time someone wants to argue about stats they act like this information can’t possibly be obtained and talk as if the sample size must be like 7 people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are they the same people?

You are aware that different people can think different things, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Wow you aren’t all the same people!? You aren’t all one person!? Man yeah that is literally the only way my comment could be interpreted. There are clearly no largely shared opinions here ever so I’m clearly living in a fantasy and just need to remember everyone is completely unique and no one agrees. Thanks for your concern you can move on now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sure, be a dick about it. Why not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look I’ll back off. You’re right, I’m going off for no reason. I don’t need to be another person pissed off pissing off other people. I’m sorry. Taking out some mild frustrations on you isn’t cool.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a good comment and we should all try to think like this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Better to not behave how I did in the first place lol but I’m glad it had an impact regardless

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You’re right I should behave more like your previous comment and ask sarcastic, disingenuous qiestions. That’s a way better way to communicate.

Should I be like you? Is that preferred?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

By all means, keep going. Get the nasty out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if you saw my other comment but tldr sorry

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

No worries. I know the feeling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which people? I don't recall seeing any comments like that on Lemmy, at least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You want me to dig up posts from when the first polls came out after Harris was nominated?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maybe not, but it's encouraging! Harris/Walz are stoking enthusiasm because they want to actually improve people's lives, not just repeat the same tired culture-war bullshit...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

You don't know the margin of error unless you know the sample size. I didn't see the sample size mentioned in the article.

load more comments
view more: next ›