[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Conservativism isn't an ideology based on principles. It's built on the identity of the conservative as the good guy. You cannot apply rationality to conservatives, because they aren't holding rational positions. Whatever they say is good because they are the good guys. Anyone who opposes them is the bad guy, and anything the bad guy does is bad because they are the bad guy. If the good guy conservative and the bad guy progressive do the exact same thing, the conservative believes that it is good when the good guy does it and bad when the bad guy does it. It's not hypocritical because it isn't a conflicting viewpoint, it's just an entirely subjective viewpoint that changes based on where the conservative is standing. Like imagine playing NFL football with a team that has defined the end zone as wherever they are standing on the field. Wherever they are, Touchdown! Because touchdowns happen wherever they are standing. If you take the ball from them, then it is no longer the end zone because they don't have the ball anymore. If you push their defense back, you still can never score because the end zone moves with them.

That's the game Conservatives play, and that's why you will never convince them they are wrong. You cannot compromise with a conservative, and you cannot show them the flaws in their positions because they have no positions. If they realize they were wrong, they will simply move three feet to another position and decide that they were justified in their false belief at the time they held it.

That's why you see so many leopards eating their faces, but you never see them grow or learn from the experience. It's why they can condemn abortion and then demand an abortion when they want one. It's why they can support violence against immigrants while being immigrants, because they believe themselves to be "the good ones." It's why they can insist on small government when it comes to their industry or lifestyle choices, but they will insist on regulating and taxing into oblivion anything they don't like.

Imagine how comforting that must feel, to be playing a game where you're always winning because you are defined as the winner. As long as you remain within the identity of the in-group, and support the same delusion in others, you can never be wrong. It's seductive and easy. You don't have to learn anything, or question anything, or prove anything. Your goodness insists upon itself, and everything else is evil trying to knock you off your game. You're not selfish, you're conservative. You want to preserve and protect the "good" which is coincidentally yourself. You want to change the "bad" which is conveniently anything uou don't like.

It's a pattern that always results in fascism, oligarchy, corruption, and oppression.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

And they would put some fucking flat earther in charge of the project, resulting in some additional ecological disaster of epic proportions.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

What the fuck are you talking about?

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Foxes warn Coyotes are eating all the Hens.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

The reason is not unclear. Samsung doesn't want you to sideload software onto their devices.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Probably for the best under the current administration. They'd try to build an ICE detention center with Trump's face large enough to be seen from Earth. None of the astronauts would survive.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I would have thought you were right, but we're eyebrow deep in this shit. The human capacity for ignoring a problem in favor of remaining comfortable has shaken my faith in humanity. I hope you're right.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

We don't have to make that case. The case went before the tribunal and the landlord was fined for making disparaging statements to their tenant. It's also worth noting that the tenant was evicted, and that's why the complaint was filed. The tribunal did not find that the tenant was evicted because of bigotry, but did find that the text messages warranted a fine.

We don't actually know what the "tepid criticisms" were, because the content of the texts wasn't in the article.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

We're already engaged in the mass incarceration and extrajudicial murder of immigrants and dissenters. People seem reluctant to rebel.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Ironically, if he is successful, it would be a national emergency.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 99 points 4 days ago

The cruelty is the point.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, the DNC supports genocide. Trump is worse, which is really a testament to how phenomally bad he is for just about everyone on the planet. I want progressive democrats on the ballot, but I'm not holding my breath. I'm still going to vote, and I'm going to vote for the least bad option.

114

Yes, I know, Roku sucks for a variety of reasons, and we can just add this to the pile.

Roku launched a new feature, Backdrops, which is just a screensaver that they foist upon you. But they must have gotten complaints about screen burn in, because months after the lauch, they pushed an update that adds this notification pop-up.

A few things that should have been obvious:

  • A television with the screensaver on is probably unattended.
  • The point of a rotating screensaver is to avoid static images that cause screen burn
  • The pop-up never goes away and covers the bottom of the screen across all images, with the QR code in stark black on white, which is most likely to create screen burn.

The thing is, this is such a small issue, but it belies a foundational disrespect for users. The carelessness and incompetence could be ignored, but the obligatory nature of pushing this out without consent or care is why it fits squarely in asshole territory.

9

I have received these two loaves of delicious whole grain bread. Problem is, I doubt we will eat it all before it goes stale. I could do croutons, bread crumbs, or even a breakfast casserole, but I was thinking about bread pudding.

Has anyone done this? Do I need to tweak the recipe, like add more milk or some other flavor to balance the nutty seed and grain flavor? Maybe add some apples for textural balance?

I don't want to waste them, so if this is a fools errand, I can do bread bowl dips or something for the playoff games tomorrow. But I am committed to not letting this bounty go to waste.

494
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by themeatbridge@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

There's a post I saw on reddit that points to the dimple on the side of a milk jug, and makes fun of all the people who don't know what that's for. In the comments are thousands of people giving dozens of different explanations, and all of them are wrong.

It is not there to indicate that the milk has spoiled by popping out due to gasses produced by spoiled milk. If there was enough gas to pop out the dimple, the whole jug would look like a balloon.

It is not there to provide structural integrity, like lateral support to prevent the bottles from crushing. The contents are under pressure, so if there was enough force on the jug from any direction, then the cap would pop off regardless of the shape in the sidewall.

The actual answer is that the dimple is added to ensure that all of the jugs contain the same volume of milk. Plastic jugs are blown into molds, and minor manufacturing variations over time would create jugs that hold different amounts of milk. Larger jugs would hold more than a gallon. They could just fill by volume, but consumers are wary of purchasing a bottle if it appears to be less full than the others. So they add the dimple to make it so that the level of milk is all the way at the top with minimal air between the milk and the cap.

You can verify this yourself by finding different jugs from the same supplier with dimples of different depths, or even no dimple at all. None of those other explanations would explain dimples of different sizes or jugs without dimples.

TLDR everybody is wrong. The milk jug dimples are added to ensure the jug contains the correct volume of milk.

55
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by themeatbridge@lemmy.world to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org

If you have a video that autoplays at the top of your article, and I have to scroll past it to read the article, I don't want it to pop out and scroll down along with me. It blocks the top third of the screen. Who even thinks of that? Why would a person in charge of making decisions say "Oh, yeah, neat. I like the way that works, let's not change anything." I don't want any videos to autoplay at all ever for any reason. If I scroll past it, it should autostop.

Fucking web developers.

Edit: Yes, you're right, it's not the fault of web developers. At least, it's mostly not their fault. They still came up with this shit, but it's executives and middle managers who demand it.

103
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by themeatbridge@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
12
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by themeatbridge@lemmy.world to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org

I know everybody is probably sick of hearing that the lotto is a tax on people who are bad at math, but it's far more deceptive than just a complicated expected value equation. Powerball and Mega Millions advertising the sum total of a thirty year annuity as the value of the jackpot is simply a lie. It is false. No, the Powerball is not $248 million dollars. That's literally not what the value of the jackpot is worth.

Advertisements are prohibited from being deceptive because people are gullible. If you were selling jars of tomato sauce, and when people opened them up, they find a bunch of tomato seeds, that would be less of a lie than the current promotion for lotto tickets. You wouldn't be able to say "well, everyone knows that the jars don't have the sauce yet. Eventually, the tomatoes will grow and you can make sauce with them, or we can plant them for you and send you a few tablespoons of sauce every year." You'd be laughed out of court and right into jail, because that's fraud.

You could still have the lotto without the fraud. It would still be a tax on people bad at math. $70 million dollars is functionally equivalent to $248 million, in that it's enough money to change your life forever. People could still purchase the dream of a better life for $2 each, and most of the same people still would because gambling is an addiction. You could be completely honest about how unfair the game is, and people would still happily play.

And that's what bugs me about it. It's so unnecessary. No other casino or gambling establishment could get away with something so transparently dishonest, and they don't have to while still making money hand over fist.

483
This place is dead (lemmy.world)

Haven't seen any posts all year.

456

“Tonight, Missouri lynched another innocent Black man,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement.

222

I heard someone say this in a video recipe, followed by way more cheese than you should eat at once. It occurred to me that the phrase means ample, not nutritious.

226

Has this ever happened to you? There's a fly in the house, buzzing around you, so you go to the cabinet to get the swatter. But as soon as you start wielding it, the little bastard disappears. You set it down, and now he's back, taunting you.

Ok so obviously flies don't taunt, but do they have the capacity to recognize, even instinctually, that I'm holding a deadly weapon?

view more: next ›

themeatbridge

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF