[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

It kinda sounds like you're arguing jn favor of your own racial supremacy. I assume you're going for satire, but it's difficult to distinguish between ironic racism and sincere racism.

That will get you a ban.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 4 weeks ago

    I think we got a preview during Covid of just how selfish and lazy people can be. Stay home and wear a mask outside was far too much to ask of the American people. People murdered people over masking. Little piece of fabric over your nose and mouth, and only when you're inside a store or public building. "No, I'd rather you be dead."

    When the water runs out and the air is toxic and the grocery shelves are bare, it's going to be chaos.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 20 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Superhero movies have been around forever. The fatigue is from reviewers being forced to take some of them seriously. Certain people take a special delight in stomping on comic book movies, because it drives engagement. Case in point, here's what appears to be an objectively good movie coming out in a year with only one other superhero movie this year so far, and the headline includes a potshot about superhero fatigue. I haven't seen Supergirl yet, but from the reviews I gather that is was a little slow and misogyny is alive and well. That's it.

    We will get Clayface in September, an R-rated bodyhorror film which isn't really about superheroes, and Avengers Doomsday, which is admittedly a massive Superhero crossover film with dozens of characters from various films.

    Four major comic book movies this year from two studios, only three of which feature superheroes, but we're talking about fatigue. Is superhero-fatigue-fatigue a thing?

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    We are going to avoid doing the hard things until the hard things are forced upon us. There's too much profit in keeping things status quo, so any attempt to make the world a better place is met with the unified forces of unfettered capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Probably the river, although the beach would be nice if I knew there was also fresh water nearby. $1000 would be more than enough for clothes and tools, but I might spend a good chunk of it on some shelf-stable food and vitamin supplements. A year is a long time.

  • source
  •  

    I am supposed to turn in a major project, and I'm so far behind. I have adhd and my executive dysfunction has been out of control for weeks. I am already two days past the deadline, and nobody has called me on it yet, but the minute they do shit will hit the fan.

    I'm scrambling to pull something together, but it's not going to be enough.

     

    So I just finished watching the second season for a second time, and I have to talk about it with someone.

    First off, holy shit is it good. No complaints, no notes. Visually, it's gorgeous. Casting is perfection, costumes, visuals, practical effects, set designs, it is as close to the manga and anime in visual style without being "cartoony." If I said that the special effects were the weakest link in the chain, that's only because everything else is so great.

    Acting, writing, editing, direction, all of it shows a dedication to the source material and a care for making the best possible show. The choices for what to cut (because obviously it needs to be condensed) make sense at every turn, keeping fresh a story we all already know.

    When I think of all the live action adaptations that completely failed, I'm thrilled that we have two seasons of One Piece as a model for how to do it right. I hope we get 12 more.

     

    Yes, I know, Roku sucks for a variety of reasons, and we can just add this to the pile.

    Roku launched a new feature, Backdrops, which is just a screensaver that they foist upon you. But they must have gotten complaints about screen burn in, because months after the lauch, they pushed an update that adds this notification pop-up.

    A few things that should have been obvious:

    • A television with the screensaver on is probably unattended.
    • The point of a rotating screensaver is to avoid static images that cause screen burn
    • The pop-up never goes away and covers the bottom of the screen across all images, with the QR code in stark black on white, which is most likely to create screen burn.

    The thing is, this is such a small issue, but it belies a foundational disrespect for users. The carelessness and incompetence could be ignored, but the obligatory nature of pushing this out without consent or care is why it fits squarely in asshole territory.

     

    I have received these two loaves of delicious whole grain bread. Problem is, I doubt we will eat it all before it goes stale. I could do croutons, bread crumbs, or even a breakfast casserole, but I was thinking about bread pudding.

    Has anyone done this? Do I need to tweak the recipe, like add more milk or some other flavor to balance the nutty seed and grain flavor? Maybe add some apples for textural balance?

    I don't want to waste them, so if this is a fools errand, I can do bread bowl dips or something for the playoff games tomorrow. But I am committed to not letting this bounty go to waste.

     

    There's a post I saw on reddit that points to the dimple on the side of a milk jug, and makes fun of all the people who don't know what that's for. In the comments are thousands of people giving dozens of different explanations, and all of them are wrong.

    It is not there to indicate that the milk has spoiled by popping out due to gasses produced by spoiled milk. If there was enough gas to pop out the dimple, the whole jug would look like a balloon.

    It is not there to provide structural integrity, like lateral support to prevent the bottles from crushing. The contents are under pressure, so if there was enough force on the jug from any direction, then the cap would pop off regardless of the shape in the sidewall.

    The actual answer is that the dimple is added to ensure that all of the jugs contain the same volume of milk. Plastic jugs are blown into molds, and minor manufacturing variations over time would create jugs that hold different amounts of milk. Larger jugs would hold more than a gallon. They could just fill by volume, but consumers are wary of purchasing a bottle if it appears to be less full than the others. So they add the dimple to make it so that the level of milk is all the way at the top with minimal air between the milk and the cap.

    You can verify this yourself by finding different jugs from the same supplier with dimples of different depths, or even no dimple at all. None of those other explanations would explain dimples of different sizes or jugs without dimples.

    TLDR everybody is wrong. The milk jug dimples are added to ensure the jug contains the correct volume of milk.

    submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org
     

    If you have a video that autoplays at the top of your article, and I have to scroll past it to read the article, I don't want it to pop out and scroll down along with me. It blocks the top third of the screen. Who even thinks of that? Why would a person in charge of making decisions say "Oh, yeah, neat. I like the way that works, let's not change anything." I don't want any videos to autoplay at all ever for any reason. If I scroll past it, it should autostop.

    Fucking web developers.

    Edit: Yes, you're right, it's not the fault of web developers. At least, it's mostly not their fault. They still came up with this shit, but it's executives and middle managers who demand it.

    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org
     

    I know everybody is probably sick of hearing that the lotto is a tax on people who are bad at math, but it's far more deceptive than just a complicated expected value equation. Powerball and Mega Millions advertising the sum total of a thirty year annuity as the value of the jackpot is simply a lie. It is false. No, the Powerball is not $248 million dollars. That's literally not what the value of the jackpot is worth.

    Advertisements are prohibited from being deceptive because people are gullible. If you were selling jars of tomato sauce, and when people opened them up, they find a bunch of tomato seeds, that would be less of a lie than the current promotion for lotto tickets. You wouldn't be able to say "well, everyone knows that the jars don't have the sauce yet. Eventually, the tomatoes will grow and you can make sauce with them, or we can plant them for you and send you a few tablespoons of sauce every year." You'd be laughed out of court and right into jail, because that's fraud.

    You could still have the lotto without the fraud. It would still be a tax on people bad at math. $70 million dollars is functionally equivalent to $248 million, in that it's enough money to change your life forever. People could still purchase the dream of a better life for $2 each, and most of the same people still would because gambling is an addiction. You could be completely honest about how unfair the game is, and people would still happily play.

    And that's what bugs me about it. It's so unnecessary. No other casino or gambling establishment could get away with something so transparently dishonest, and they don't have to while still making money hand over fist.

     

    Has this ever happened to you? There's a fly in the house, buzzing around you, so you go to the cabinet to get the swatter. But as soon as you start wielding it, the little bastard disappears. You set it down, and now he's back, taunting you.

    Ok so obviously flies don't taunt, but do they have the capacity to recognize, even instinctually, that I'm holding a deadly weapon?

    view more: next ›