this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
140 points (98.6% liked)

politics

22220 readers
217 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to [email protected].

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].

[email protected] is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 months ago (2 children)

80% of politics is just vibes and most people would be exposed to nothing more than the occasional headline.

It’s why kissing babies or successfully eating a hotdog without being weird (which a remarkable number of politicians fail at) is so important.

Like, people don’t read books but they see the bookshelves with your memoirs on then and they notice your choice of typography and that’s how elections are decided.

Representative democracy is a fraud.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

This is also why it's funny people think that the Gaza genocide will be some kind of millstone around Biden or Harris's campaign. The American electorate has only the loosest understanding of what domestic politics are and literally doesn't give the slightest shit about foreign policy or people in other countries. Or perhaps a better way to put it is that foreign policy has absolutely zero impact on how Americans vote.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

foreign policy has absolutely zero impact on how Americans vote

I'd say it's more:

  1. There are rarely big party differences in foreign policy due to both parties supporting versions of imperialism -- for instance neither party is campaigning on even an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.
  2. More people care about domestic policy than foreign policy, so there's a concerted effort at all levels of both parties and in the media to focus more on domestic issues.

A big chunk of voters do care -- look at all the protests against Israel, look at all the anti-war sentiment against Iraq and Vietnam -- there are just huge factors steamrolling those opinions before they can be a deciding factor.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

the democrats win when the 'normal' ill-informed yankees turn out to vote, by being marginally less putrescent. the issue for Biden/Harris is not the feelings of those people who on average probably don't care, it's the organizations that can increase their turnout but will withhold their organizing efforts. those assholes that knock on doors & bus folks to the polls are ideological and informed, that's what the democrats are going to capitulate

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Or perhaps a better way to put it is that foreign policy has absolutely zero impact on how Americans vote.

this is also true for the """good""" things that the US achieves like getting countries into NATO, which is why Biden's statement before he dropped out where he was like "I got Finland and Sweden into NATO! I got AUKUS done!" was so funny. Literally nobody cares. Most people are judging Biden and Trump based on the most incoherent criteria in human history, because none of it really matters, because both parties are promising that the treats will keep coming in. Hillary Clinton is a war criminal who brought slavery to Libya, leading to the mass impoverishment of millions of people - and I know with absolute certainty that that fact did not lose her any more than a thousand votes across the whole country of hundreds of millions, and only Libyan migrants would have given a shit. It was her hairstyle, or demeanor, or talking style, or maybe some vague exhaustion with Obama and "well, it's only fair if the Republicans get a term after the Dems got two! :)"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have a hard time wrapping my head around this... how do people just live in ignorance?

My brain has a million thoughts running through it and these people's brains are 🕸🕸🕸

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Leaded gasoline was only fully banned in cars in the mid 1990’s. It’s still in propeller plane AvGas.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'll never not be surprised by both the pure idiocy of certain members of the American electorate and the ability of professional journalists to locate these specimens.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the ability of professional journalists to locate these specimens.

Heave half a brick out of window and you'll hit one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Americans don't believe in anything

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They only believe in the last thing they heard or read

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

my mum is sort of this way - she's Singaporean and has been very Conservative Catholic my entire life, but I remember she pulled me aside a few years ago talking about how Australia needed to be like China because 'under their Authoritarian regime, things actually get done and they can plan for the future properly'

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

Yeah my mom undulates between hating the CCP and lamenting how shitty the US is about maternity leave and guns

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not that 'voters' are incoherent, even though many are, it's that swing voters between the Democrats and the Republicans are completely incoherent because there is nothing objectively different between the parties aside from some levels of bureaucratic government shenanigans that barely affects us because both sides are bad at doing effective bureaucracy (which doesn't actually need to be 'efficient', it just needs to actually accomplish that which it sets out to do, which is the most important government skill), and vibes based on social justice or whatever is brewing in the culture war that only like 25% of any of the party actually gives a shit about at any time.

And it is these swing voters that people in the party chase, most of whom in my experience are basically just 'Chyna bad' voters and whomever publicly whips the whipping boy the most gets their vote.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

there is nothing objectively different between the parties

While both are anti labor or pro Oligarchy parties, one is definitely a lot worse than the other. One party aims to uphold the status quo while the other works to establish a reactionary theocracy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is incorrect. The Democrats do not work to 'uphold the status quo'. They actively and purposefully undermine the efforts of progressives who are seeking to work against those attempting to entrench local reactionary theocratic tendencies. It's acceleration by another name. And this is because you don't understand the Republican project.

Calling what the Republicans are seeking a 'theocracy' is hyperbolic and misunderstands the distinct petite bourgeoisie nature of American Protestant faith. They are not seeking a Mormon style control of the country, they are seeking the opposite, they wish to dissolve the country into theocratic fiefdoms based on the particular religious inclinations of the petite bourgeoisie. That doesn't mean they don't wish for Christian dominion over the world, but that is just cope for the fact that they are stuck in the financialized neo-liberal hegemony like everyone else. This suits the Democrats just fine because they will also get their little quasi-religious fiefdoms on the coasts, where the real economic power is anyways.

And all this really is doing is creating legislation to legally justify already existing practices in these areas. The 'theocracy' is here, we just stick too much to the edges of society to interact with it.

Edit: Sorry for being rude, it's just that I genuinely fight with these supposedly different 'democrats' on a regular basis, and they are basically as fucked in the head as your average Republican, there is very little distinction outside of the fact that they don't want to see the misery, but if it happens just out of earshot, then it doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This difference is more apparent at state and local levels, too. There are tons of strong criticisms of Democrats; the argument of "no they're literally the same" isn't necessary and doesn't work particularly well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the media is just making shit up and it's mostly donors that think like this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think journalists are just good at finding crackpots that make for good OpEd anecdotes. I'm not denying that Yanks are by are large extremely stupid, but as much as we gone on about people having incoherent politics, it's been my experience that most people do have a somewhat consistent worldview informing their political decisions, they just either have weird values, horrid analysis, or both.

Like surveying the people I work with, who are on a spectrum of MAGA Chud to Bernie Bro, most can articulate some vague set of values that are mostly consistent, but they suck at actually assessing anything materially and just assume things are happening either randomly or because of malicious actors in high place. I don't wear my politics on my sleeve at work, but what's weird is when I actually offer them some kind of economic or geopolitical analysis on why something is happening, they all seem to think I'm the smarter boy on planet earth cuz they "didn't think that may". But if I ever said "Marx" much less "Lenin" they'd tar and feather me so I guess occasionally dumbfounding them is the best I got shrug-outta-hecks

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I think journalists are just good at finding crackpots that make for good OpEd anecdotes.

  1. Interview enough people until you find some cranks
  2. Print only the crank opinions
  3. Cranks are overrepresented
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People put more thought into picking a character in a fighting game

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i mean, a fighting game character actually responds to your inputs. right now we're playing government on a wifi connection.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

right now we're playing government on a wifi connection.

More like playing it on attract mode

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Much like electoralism, I still haven't gotten into Guilty Gear because none of the characters appeal enough to pick a main from and I'd still much rather be playing BlazBlue

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Rubemaxxing

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (5 children)

These people like to cosplay as swing voters.

Real swing voters might have voted Trump in 2016 and Biden in 2020.

But anyone who voted for Trump twice and is seriously entertaining a third vote for Trump after Jan. 6, Dobbs and his felonies is not a swing voter.

Swing voters will sway democratic this election.

The real question is simply how hard each base turns up.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nobody cares about his felonies.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't get this site, why does everyone with Lemmy in their username have weird BlueMAGA takes?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if you're doing a bit, but they're users from other Lemmy instances outside of Hexbear, and they usually have lib-ass takes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I am not doing a bit, it just has been baffling scrolling Hexbear then suddenly seeing a comment about the marketplace of ideas sorting everything out or whatever, and it's always from someone with Lemmy in their name. They all seem like the Carl Diggler character Felix Biederman used to do, but more on-the-nose.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Because on their home instance, that's the normal perspective. They wander in here, like a lost dog, thinking it's their backyard, and start barking, expecting to get a chorus of howls in response but instead get told to shut up.

They're not from here, their instance is full of other libs, and lib communities. They're probably browsing their instance's "All" feed and see these posts because someone from their instance has subscribed to [email protected]. They have "lemmy" in their username because many of these instances have it in their domain name. lemmy.world, lemmy.ml, lemmy.dbzer0.com, lemmy.ee, etc. When our comments show up in their instance, the names have @hexbear.net on the end [email protected] . Lemmy is a federated system, that means these sites are all interconnected, but otherwise their own self-contained ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seriously, half the reason a lot of people like Trump is he's a wacky, edgy, "outsider" who doesn't give a fuck about decorum. Only nerd ass West Wing fans care that he's a felon, for everyone else it just adds to his bad boy mystique.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Everyone also knows he's done much worse things that he'll never get punished for in any way. I don't understand why Trump getting a slap on the wrist over some financial regulations is supposed to be some huge win.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Liberals:

Be directly responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of innocent people, mostly women and children: I SLEEP

Commit a felony by not filling out the proper paperwork for usage of campaign funds: REAL SHIT

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Swing voters will sway democratic this election.

i dont think you should treat this statement as 100% true, from what i have learn swing voters are centrists who while they like to act that they care about policy and stuff they only really care about which candidate looks the strongest/coolest, its good biden dropped because he looks frail and with dementia, but the dems will still have to get someone that at least can clap back at trump or look ok or his strategy of "unifying" the country by getting a Never trump republican as VP with give him the small lead he needs to win.

i dont think either base will decide the election

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Swing voters... want to gamble that they are voting for the "winning" candidate and get more satisfaction from this than from any potential policies the winning administration might implement.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Swing voters will sway democratic this election.

and if you keep repeating this mantra to yourself maybe it will become true

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is one odd vibe shift I am noticing, which is people who say the r-slur and use "gay" in a derogatory manner backing Dems this cycle

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

the dem base is shedding all of the progressive posturing they've been doing for the past decade just like they tossed "me too" aside once there was a credible accusation against biden

soon the differences between the parties won't even be aesthetic beyond the color palette of the ties and banners

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Nobody cares about jan 6 or some weird accounting crimes. You'd have to be extremely unhinged to be concerned at paperwork being filed slightly wrong. And Jan 6 is a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

the word you're looking for is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

If you were in charge of major party, why would you ever try to cater to these people? They definitionally do not have coherent, stable political opinions, and there aren't that many of them anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›