this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
140 points (98.6% liked)

politics

22220 readers
189 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to [email protected].

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].

[email protected] is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the media is just making shit up and it's mostly donors that think like this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think journalists are just good at finding crackpots that make for good OpEd anecdotes. I'm not denying that Yanks are by are large extremely stupid, but as much as we gone on about people having incoherent politics, it's been my experience that most people do have a somewhat consistent worldview informing their political decisions, they just either have weird values, horrid analysis, or both.

Like surveying the people I work with, who are on a spectrum of MAGA Chud to Bernie Bro, most can articulate some vague set of values that are mostly consistent, but they suck at actually assessing anything materially and just assume things are happening either randomly or because of malicious actors in high place. I don't wear my politics on my sleeve at work, but what's weird is when I actually offer them some kind of economic or geopolitical analysis on why something is happening, they all seem to think I'm the smarter boy on planet earth cuz they "didn't think that may". But if I ever said "Marx" much less "Lenin" they'd tar and feather me so I guess occasionally dumbfounding them is the best I got shrug-outta-hecks

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I think journalists are just good at finding crackpots that make for good OpEd anecdotes.

  1. Interview enough people until you find some cranks
  2. Print only the crank opinions
  3. Cranks are overrepresented