this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
416 points (99.1% liked)

News

23259 readers
2946 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 163 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Fucking South Carolina. How the shit is something that doesn’t conceal your face a mask??

[–] [email protected] 226 points 3 months ago (15 children)

Because it’s selectively enforced in order to oppress Black people

[–] [email protected] 114 points 3 months ago

This is without exaggeration the reasoning behind like 90% of South Carolina's policies. Absolute shithole state, my heart goes out to people whose communities are there.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's a hood. I thought southerners liked hoods considering all the defending they do of the Klan.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Maybe if the hood had been white. Or most definitely his skin.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

The sad thing is, according to the article, this was originally an anti-Klan law. And now it's being used to selectively and falsely prosecute black kids.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 143 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Isn't it painfully ironic that right wingers who cried about being told what to do by the state suddenly imposed a non-scientific law imposing what people can't do to their own body?

So much for individual freedumb amirite.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

See, you don't understand.

Freedom means freedom... for them. For them to do what they want, impose what they want on others, and to do it all without repercussions.

This is a fine example of it. They want the freedom to be free of "burdensome" mandates. but they want the absolute authority to impose mandates on others, without anyone being able to push back against it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

That's because they're authoritarians. They are protecting a hierarchy that they believe exists in the world. That's why they don't mind if rich white men hurt them. Those people are higher in their hierarchy, so it makes sense to them.

They don't like it if non-white people or women in general try to subvert this hierarchy. They believe if someone else rises in status they might fall in status. To them it's "not right"; it's a moral issue that people should "stay in their place" in the hierarchy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are absolutely trash...the party of small government until they're in charge, then it's fine as long as the laws punish other people. (Hint none of the shit they want to impose affects anyone. Like gays getting married. Hasn't changed my life one but, why should I care about preventing things that don't impact my life? Shouldn't I mind my own business?) Also the party of fiscal responsibility until they are in charge, then it's spend spend spend, for the rich, tax breaks for the rich and less services and higher taxes for us.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

The whole of conservatism is "there must be outgroups for the law to bind but not protect, and in groups for the law to protect but not bind"

That's it.

They're trash people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

So oddly enough this law is really old and is actually an anti KKK law.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The "mask" isn't even a mask. *Similar to blah blah blah.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don't know exactly what that is, but I definitely wouldn't call it a mask.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don't usually think of hats as going under the chin like that, but I guess there's no reason they can't.

It's like the removable hood from a jacket but without the jacket.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This mf keep you warm like you wouldn't believe, strap on that chin strap and roast

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I would consider the thing that Finn from Adventure Time wears a hat, and that’s similar to this, was my reasoning.

[–] bdonvr 13 points 3 months ago

It's like an inverse mask

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s like an anti-mask, covering every thing on the face except what a mask does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

If the goal was something that "conceals their identity in public" it's doing a pretty crappy job.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Maybe they don’t like ewoks

[–] [email protected] 93 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It’s funny how this didn’t happen to a white person. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 months ago

It's almost like ACAB or something.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

Laws that are stupid need to be violated. People should join this poor fella and shit on that joke of a law by wearing this "mask" as mich as possible.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just another law targeted at black people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Someone on Bluesky pointed out that masks are part of Asian culture and this is obviously racist against Asians. I think that's right.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

It's an old law that was actually passed to fight against the KKK, many states have similar laws, but apparently this one wasn't worded too carefully so intent isn't a part of the law, in other states you have to be clearly trying to hide your identity, this guy was wareing an open face ski hood. His entire face was visible, and he walked into police breaking up a fight or something, so they pounced on him as if he were involved, but clearly wasn't as they didn't charge with anything related to the fight.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Unless you're rich; then you have to also have intent to break the law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Unless you're rich enough to bribe the DA.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

It's the South, he's black in the heart of racistville, and Republicans hate medical masks because they're stupid. He's got the entire deck there stacked against him. I hope he's able to get out of this damn situation, and preferably also moves out of that useless state.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

9th amendment continues to be pissed on

load more comments
view more: next ›