bdonvr

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] bdonvr 6 points 5 hours ago

Abortion isn't federally illegal. The doctor's actions were legal in NY.

Being interstate commerce this case could conceivably only be federal jurisdiction no?

[–] bdonvr 13 points 19 hours ago

And Cuba's famous lax stance on drug possession

[–] bdonvr 20 points 19 hours ago

They've been participating in orgs way more actively than y'all's lib asses.

[–] bdonvr 8 points 19 hours ago

They've stacked the judiciary and the legislative seems unwilling to put up a fight.

Even if the judiciary wouldn't be onboard with the sheer scale of destruction of the system they're meant to uphold going on here, that takes weeks, months, years.

They can gut the fed in days as you see. They can barge into whatever branch of the government, start barking illegal orders and expect to be followed. Nobody is stopping them. The scale of it overwhelms what the system would've been able to fix in the past.

I try not to be hyperbolic but Trump and Co have destroyed the thin veneer of legality far faster than I thought possible and faced vanishingly little real pushback. We're past laws at this point, The unloyal are being purged as we speak and this shit is going to hit an exponential curve of fucked now.

[–] bdonvr 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Leftists have always been mostly pro-gun. Not in a fetishist, burning desire to murder in the way that right wingers are. We just understand that it's a lot harder to oppress an armed group, and also that the oppressive system isn't gonna overthrow itself.

That's not to say change through peaceful means isn't possible or shouldn't be attempted as much as possible, but it has generally only ever worked with the threat of violence should it fail. But history and theory shows us it will probably come to violence.

Who are we going to arm? Undocumented people? Trans people?

Sounds like a great start. We're all oppressed by capitalism, but marginalized like these are also oppressed in different ways on top of that (intersectionality). Good on identifying that.

And they're going to shoot who? The cops, ICE? what's the plan General?

We've not had to deal with large scale civil conflicts in most of the west for a while. But when it comes down to it, yeah probably. We haven't reached that point yet, seemingly.

But anyway if you still hold Liberal views about banning all guns from private ownership I urge you to encourage gun ownership among marginalized people. You will never see the government quicker to ban guns than the day they start arming themselves en masse. California's (relatively) stronger gun laws started to be passed in response to Black Panther members encouraging much the same under Reagan's governorship.

[–] bdonvr 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As many verified genocide victims in Palestine as possible

[–] bdonvr 16 points 1 day ago

Automotive too

[–] bdonvr 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How hard is it for most people to go to university?

 

Article TextWASHINGTON, D.C. — What started Thursday as a political purge of the internal security services accelerated Friday into a full-blown coup, as elite technical units aligned with media oligarch Elon Musk moved to seize key systems at the national treasury, block outside access to federal personnel records, and take offline governmental communication networks.

With rapidity that has stunned even longtime political observers, forces loyal to Musk’s junta have established him as the all-but undisputed unelected head of government in just a matter of days, unwinding the longtime democracy’s constitutional system and its proud nearly 250-year-old tradition of the rule of law. Having secured themselves in key ministries and in a building adjacent to the presidential office complex, Musk’s forces have begun issuing directives to civil service workers and forcing the resignation of officials deemed insufficiently loyal, like the head of the country’s aviation authority.

The G-7 country’s newly installed president, a mid-level oligarch named Donald Trump, appeared amid Musk’s moves to be increasingly merely a figurehead head of state. Trump is a convicted felon with a long record of family corruption and returned in power in late January after a four-year interlude promising retribution and retaliation against foreign opponents and a domestic “Deep State.” He had been charged with attempting to overthrow the peaceful transition of power that had previously removed him from office in 2021, but loyalist elements in the judiciary successfully blocked his prosecution and incarceration, easing his return to power.

Over the last two weeks, loyalist presidential factions and Musk-backed teams have launched sweeping, illegal Stalin-esque purges of the national police forces and prosecutors, as well as offices known as inspectors-general, who are typically responsible for investigating government corruption. While official numbers of the unprecedented ousters were kept secret, rumors swirled in the capital that the scores of career officials affected by the initial purges could rise into the thousands as political commissars continued to assess the backgrounds of members of the police forces.

The mentally declining and aging head of state, who has long embraced conspiracist thinking, spent much of the week railing in bizarre public remarks against the country’s oppressed racial and ethnic minorities, whom he blamed without evidence for causing a deadly plane crash across the river from the presidential mansion. Unfounded racist attacks on those minorities have been a key foundation of Trump’s unpredicted rise to political power from a career as a real estate magnate and reality TV host and date back to his first announcement that he would seek the presidency in 2015, when he railed against “rapists” being sent into the country from its southern neighbor.

In one of his first moves upon returning to the presidency, he mobilized far-right paramilitary security forces to begin raids at churches, schools, and workplaces to identify and remove racial minorities, including those who had long lived in harmony with the country’s white Christian majority. He also immediately moved to release from prison some 1,500 supporters who had participated in his unsuccessful 2021 insurrection, including members of violent far-right militias who promptly upon release swore fealty to him in any future civil unrest. Elsewhere, even as he released violent criminals onto the streets, Trump by fiat pulled longstanding government security protection from former military and health officials he felt had betrayed him.

Underscoring his apparent disconnection from reality, reports surfaced that the president had ordered military forces to unleash an environmental catastrophe and flood regions of a separatist province known as California that is led by a high-profile political opponent. The order underscored how the military, which had resisted Trump’s unconstitutional power grabs in his first administration, was now led by a subservient defense minister, a favored TV personality with no experience in management who faced an embarrassing series of allegations about his drunken behavior in the workplace.

Foreign allies who had long aligned themselves with the United States on the international stage were unsettled by increasingly destabilizing nationalistic and imperialist rhetoric coming from the president’s social media accounts—largely posted to a network owned and run by Trump himself—and worried in private conversations in capital embassies that he would mobilize the compliant military to fulfill heretofore unimaginable territorial ambitions that included seizing the country’s northern neighbor, which shares the world’s longest undefended border, and potentially colonizing Panama and Greenland.

Both the country’s defense minister, who has previously said he does not believe women should be allowed to serve in combat roles, and Trump’s new interior minister, who appeared on national TV wearing the paramilitary uniform of the border security force central to Trump’s political rise, spent much of their first days echoing and amplifying the president’s hysteria about racial and ethnic minorities. They and other government officials also immediately canceled all official observances of religious and ethnic minority holidays and launched efforts to scrub official websites and prohibit educating workers or schoolchildren about those minorities’ long, proud history in the country. Overnight Friday, hours after journalists had gone home, the defense minister’s office announced it would bar establishment independent media outlets from working out of the country’s military headquarters and replace them with friendly right-wing media organs.

The administration’s propaganda minister also announced Friday, apparently with little preparation, that it would initiate an immediate, unexpected, and seemingly ill-considered trade war with the country’s two primary economic partners, a move that if implemented would upend the national economy, disrupt supply chains, and accelerate the return of an inflationary crisis that has roiled domestic politics over the last five years and had just seemed to be returning to normal. Ironically, it was that very inflationary crisis and Trump’s promises on the campaign trail to lower the price of eggs that paved the way for his unforeseen election victory in November.

The country’s other business oligarchs have watched Musk’s unexpected and rapid rise to power with trepidation, and leading media and technology companies who compete with Musk’s extensive business empire—like Meta, Amazon, Disney, Paramount, Apple, and OpenAI—have quickly lined up to negotiate and pay bribes to the president that would allow their companies to operate unimpeded; initial payment terms ranged from million-dollar gifts to the presidential inauguration to $15 million and $25 million payments, made by Disney and Meta, to fund the construction of a presidential shrine. The highest known payment was $40 million from Amazon, which was structured as a gift to the president’s wife in exchange for the media company having the opportunity to film a hagiographic biopic.

It was unclear, exactly, what deal terms any of those bribes and payments unlocked and when subsequent tribute payments would be expected, although on Saturday Trump moved to fire and neuter government watchdogs that had long bedeviled the country’s financial elite.

Throughout the week’s fast-moving seizure of power—one that seems increasingly irreversible by the hour—neither loyalist nor opposition parliamentary leaders raised meaningful objection to the new regime or the unraveling of the country’s constitutional system of checks and balances. A few members of the geriatric legislature body offered scattered social media posts condemning the move, but parliament — where both houses are controlled by so-called “MAGA” members handpicked for their loyalty to the president — went home early for the weekend even as Musk’s forces spread through the capital streets.

It was unclear what role, if any, Musk’s forces would allow parliament to have in the new governmental structure by the time it next returned to the national assembly known as Capitol Hill.

[–] bdonvr 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah like I said. Plus it doesn't look like they've ever used it without being asked.

[–] bdonvr 43 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Not really. They're part of the Commonwealth, an association of former British colonial possessions, and "recognize" the British monarch as their own monarch. The monarch (King Charles, currently) has a representative in Canada known as the Governor General. They do a ton of stuff like appoint Prime Minister, heads of the Provinces, dissolving parliament, etc.

However they almost exclusively can only act when asked to by Parliament or the Prime Minister. They also do ceremonial stuff. They do have some emergency power however it's never been used in the post-independence era.

Basically no, not really. King Charles (King of Canada) could technically try and like dissolve the parliament or something but it would cause a constitutional crisis that would probably just end up removing the whole Canadian Monarchy thing.

But they are strong allies.

[–] bdonvr 10 points 2 days ago

This is praxis

[–] bdonvr 2 points 2 days ago

I'd imagine TPU would be a good option as well

 

My Ender 3 S1 just does anything I ask of it now that I have Klipper and a glass/mirror plate and tuned it.

It's kinda boring tbh 😂 I WANNA TINKER

54
rule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 2 weeks ago by bdonvr to c/[email protected]
 

Install F-Droid and Aurora store to get access to whatever Android apps you'd like. Pair a bluetooth keyboard and install your favorite apps.

I can use voyager (made by the excellent @[email protected]), with a browser window a YouTube window, and more open at once and floating in my real environment with passthrough. You can interact with apps by literally touching them (controllers are def better when you need to be precise or you have the app far away but hand tracking is more than good enough to do anything). You can get up and walk around and carry an app/window with you.

I'm writing this with this setup and thinking this could actually replace a tablet for some people. It's definitely better for multitasking.

I've also tested the new Windows 11 linking and it works really really well. The latency is super low, low enough to fool me into thinking it's wired. And the screens ACTUALLY rearranging according to how they are in VR so your mouse always moves across VR screens perfectly is an awesome touch that's often missing from other solutions.

 

https://www.economist.com/china/2025/01/16/an-initiative-so-feared-that-china-has-stopped-saying-its-name

agony-mescaline

Article text

An initiative so feared that China has stopped saying its name

The Economist

China | The Voldemort of economic plans

“Made in China 2025” has been a success, but at what cost?

LIKE LORD VOLDEMORT from Harry Potter, “Made in China 2025” is an initiative which induces so much fear and loathing abroad that Chinese officials dare not speak its name. The plan, introduced a decade ago, called for pouring money and resources into dozens of industries. The goal was to turn China into a green and innovative “manufacturing power”, one that relied less on labour and Western supply chains, and more on automation and new home-grown technologies. This was Xi Jinping’s vision for the Chinese economy.

[PAYWALL]

 

Sorry for the Fox link. WSJ broke the story in the last hour and I can't get around their paywall.

Paywalled source: https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-to-begin-large-scale-deportations-tuesday-e1bd89bd

Article text:

The Brief

    • President-elect Donald Trump will begin phase one of his mass deportation plan the day after his inauguration, the Wall Street Journal reports.
    • The newspaper reported the first wave of the raid would take place in Chicago.
    • During his presidential campaign, Trump vowed to launch the largest deportation program in American history.

President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly beginning phase one of his mass deportation as early as Tuesday, the day after his inauguration.

According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is planning a large-scale immigration raid in Chicago that day. The raid is expected to last all week, WSJ reports.

The WSJ reported that Los Angeles, New York, Denver, and Miami "are also in the incoming administration’s sights, and more targeted raids could come."

In a report from the Chicago Sun-Times, families bracing for Trump's planned mass deportation had also feared the raids may begin as soon as early next week. The proposed mass deportation has been a big part of Trump's campaign leading up to the 2024 Presidential Election.

"On Day One, I will launch the largest deportation program in American history to get the criminals out," Trump said during a rally in New York City back in October. "I will rescue every city and town that has been invaded and conquered, and we will put these vicious and bloodthirsty criminals in jail, then kick them the hell out of our country as fast as possible."

Months before the upcoming inauguration, Trump's incoming "border czar" Tom Homan said Chicago would be "ground zero" for the proposed mass deportations.

"If the Chicago mayor doesn’t want to help, he can step aside. But if he impedes us, if he knowingly harbors or conceals an illegal alien, I will prosecute him," Homan was quoted back in late 2024, according to WSJ's report.

This story was reported from Los Angeles.

 

TL;DR no records found. Either HB really is a bunch of libs or I didn't word the request well enough. Never done one of these before.

 

article textTikTok's bid to overturn a law which would see it banned or sold in the US from early 2025 has been rejected.

The social media company had hoped a federal appeals court would agree with its argument that the law was unconstitutional because it represented a "staggering" impact on the free speech of its 170 million US users.

But the court upheld the law, which it said "was the culmination of extensive, bipartisan action by the Congress and by successive presidents".

TikTok says it will now take its fight to the US Supreme Court, the country's highest legal authority.

The US wants TikTok sold or banned because of what it says are its owners links to the Chinese state - links TikTok and parent company Bytedance have always denied.

The court agreed the law was "carefully crafted to deal only with control by a foreign adversary, and it was part of a broader effort to counter a well-substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC (People's Republic of China)."

But TikTok said it was not the end of its legal fight.

"The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans' right to free speech, and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue," a TikTok spokesperson said in a statement.

They added that the law was based on "inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information" and a ban would censor US citizens.

Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 US Presidential Election may also present a lifeline for the app.

Despite unsuccessfully attempting to ban TikTok during his first term in 2020, he said in the run-up to the November elections he would not allow the ban on TikTok to take effect. When and why could the US ban TikTok? Is TikTok really a danger to the West?

Trump will be inaugurated on 20 January - the day after the law says TikTok must be be banned or sold.

However, it remains to be seen whether he will follow through on his pre-election vow.

Professor James Grimmelman of Cornell University said the president-elect would be "swimming upstream to give TikTok a reprieve".

"The anti-China sentiment in the US Congress is very strong, so there are now substantial constituencies in both parties that want TikTok to be restricted from the US market," he told BBC News. Users and rivals

The court case has been closely watched both by those who use TikTok- and the app's rivals.

Tiffany Cianci, a small business advocate and TikTok creator, said she was "not shocked" by Friday's decision - but told BBC News she would not be shifting her TikTok content or presence to the platform's rivals, such as Instagram.

"I'm not going to do what they want and take my content to their platforms where it's not as successful where it's more likely to be censored, where I am more likely to have less control over my audience," she said.

Nonetheless, other platforms are positioning themselves for a post-TikTok social media landscape.

Meta, which owns Facebook as well as Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads, has sought to build rivals to TikTok's short form videos within its own apps, and made changes that users have likened to TikTok amid questions over the app's US future.

Jasmine Enberg, principal analyst at eMarketer, said there would be "major upheaval" if a TikTok appeal were to fail at the Supreme Court and a ban was enforced.

She said this would be "benefitting Meta, YouTube and Snap, while hurting content creators and small businesses that rely on the app to make a living."

But TikTok won't be easily recreated, said Cory Johnson, Chief Market Strategist at Epistrophy Capital Research. Johnson said deep learning models power TikTok's recommendation engine.

"Enabling such complex AI and big data processing at TikTok's immense scale requires a colossal and expensive technical infrastructure," Johnson said.

He said TikTok's hyper-targeting and China's data laws pose significant risks, and pointed to Elon Musk's alterations to algorithms at his social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, as a cautionary tale.

In the run-up to the U.S. election, Musk's political posts received more views than all U.S. political campaign ads on X's disclosure dataset, Johnson said.

"We have very real and very recent experience in America with a social media network tweaking its algorithms to favor certain voices," he added.

 

Damn dude that's sick as hell! Is my vote

https://xcancel.com/deanbphillips/status/1864331752837153152

 
view more: next ›