118
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

lol owned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 56 points 4 weeks ago

Understandable, but probably a slight overreaction.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah I'm going to say this is too much? I could totally see a nice open palm slap to the face or better yet a punch, but setting someone on fire, idk.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 4 weeks ago

I'd mostly agree, but it sounds like the dude just sat there while she poured fuel on him, and when she made the threatening gesture, decided in was in everyone's best interest to continue egging her on. I feel like I would have been fleeing when she started trying to pour the fuel. Or I just wouldn't make a misogynistic comment, but whatever I guess.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I can imagine exactly what kind of slimey superiority complex dude would just sit there and act like he's fucking invincible to the pathetic woman who should be in the kitchen. Just barely reacting or scoffing like it's all something beneath him until he's literally on fucking fire.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago

They were all drunk or on drugs I think.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 4 weeks ago

Just picture one of Tate's followers in the chair and how they would behave. It all comes together.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 weeks ago

Most of the group was heavily intoxicated

Perhaps he was not in the best state of mind to be thinking rationally

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 weeks ago

neither was she

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah I would have bolted out of there when I saw she was serious.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 4 weeks ago

a kick in the nuts, not dousing the guy and then setting him on fire ffs

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago

Kick in the nuts sounds about right.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago

I'm going to say that based on the state they were all in, and that the guy was comfortable with saying this shit, we'd probably be looking at an article about femicide if she'd slapped him over the head (even playfully)

[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 weeks ago

I think not setting men on fire is an act of great restraint by women.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

I have amazing self control, but each day it gets a little more challenging.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 4 weeks ago

I gotta say I'm a little unsettled by all the people acting like it's a proportional response

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago

I think a lot of people are assuming a history of this sort of behaviour. If this was the only time this guy acted like this, then yeah, it would be an extreme overreaction, but this guy has probably been a massive douchebag for years, and pushed this woman to her breaking point. Still doesn't make it ok, but I think it makes it understandable why some would be pushed that far (and the alcohol and drugs probably helped dull any inhibitions as well)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Still doesn't make it ok

A lot of people seem to be disagreeing with you

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think most of the people are just joking. Or experiencing schadenfreude thinking about how satisfying it would be to see the misogynistic assholes in their life face some consequences for their actions.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago

Honestly baffling, I think most people either didn't read the article or don't understand how awful being set on fire is.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago

it's FAFO because he said "go on, do it", i think we'd be more horrified if he made any attempt to flee or deescalate before he was on fire.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago

According to the article he was "heavily intoxicated", not really a good time to be making life changing decisions like if you want to have 5 gallons of petrol poured on you and lit on fire. Even then, just because someone doesn't flee or deescalate doesn't mean they deserve to be lit on fire, holy shit.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

no part of this is "deserve".

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 weeks ago

I think you're grossly underestimating how much and how many women have to put up with this shit. You're thinking of this as a single incident where a man told a women to get in the kitchen, when it's actually years of that abuse.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago

people like mr loader are responsible for every rape, genital mutilation, etc. women have ever faced across the world so i suggest no holds barred until they each individually back up, reflect and apologise for their attitudes

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Slap him, kick him in the nuts, sure, but nearly killing him doesn't seem right.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago

I do tend to agree. But I also feel like there's too much we don't know. This guy didn't get a little loaded and suddenly become a prick and she suddenly escalated to having her own personal burning man. They've known each other for years, apparently. This couldn't have been an isolated incident. To me it feels like this was just the proverbial straw. A little liquid courage and marching powder, and we get a crispy Mr Louder.

That all said, I don't actually think this was an appropriate response still. But important to acknowledge what we don't know. Obviously she could just not be friends with the guy, probably.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
118 points (99.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13867 readers
858 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS