118
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

lol owned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly baffling, I think most people either didn't read the article or don't understand how awful being set on fire is.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

it's FAFO because he said "go on, do it", i think we'd be more horrified if he made any attempt to flee or deescalate before he was on fire.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

According to the article he was "heavily intoxicated", not really a good time to be making life changing decisions like if you want to have 5 gallons of petrol poured on you and lit on fire. Even then, just because someone doesn't flee or deescalate doesn't mean they deserve to be lit on fire, holy shit.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

no part of this is "deserve".

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

I think you're grossly underestimating how much and how many women have to put up with this shit. You're thinking of this as a single incident where a man told a women to get in the kitchen, when it's actually years of that abuse.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
118 points (99.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13855 readers
642 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS