206
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

mao-wave

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago

What actually is the focus on memorising for? Like even my English lit exams i had to memorise the quotes i was going to use for an essag question i didn't know yet.

How does this serve capitalism?

[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago

to grind you down for a life time of "because i said so"s at work.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

Related to liberal philosophy and psychology, I think, the whole "rational actors" perspective of the human being. That we are machines that take some input and spit out an output in reliable and accurate ways. The ones who don't are ignored as part of humanity to maintain the definition.

Another way to look at education is that it is a factory line to output workers to exploit for labor. The defects are discarded, and the ones who make it out are the ones who somehow take any input and reliably accurate and exploitable output (labor)

Which is why graduates of most fields have no experience and function on cultivated instincts like memorization. Only when a worker works with their actual hands, so to speak, do they learn real knowledge of their labor. This is how education used to be, an apprenticeship sort of model, which you still see in certain trades and fields like the medical field.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Memorization predates capitalism. So I'd look for reasons in pre-capital societies

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

As I understand it we imported it from China because it was a system that allowed education at greater scale than Europes previous system of having a conversation with the examiner. It lets lots of people sit the same exam at once

to say capitalism strives for greater efficiency is false it strives for greater scale

Now we stick with it because we've been doing it 200 years and people are used to it

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

It’s much easier to make and grade an exam that’s based on memorisation than on understanding. Such exams are also less prone to biased grading.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

Even bourgeois media has an obsession with memorization. What do Hollywood writers do when they want to quickly get across that a character is smart? They have him (usually a man) quote some old book/play word for word, often at length. Turns out memorizing things is a skill that almost anyone can learn and get good at. But it’s treated like some super power.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago

Looking forward to the Communist utopia where doctor has to look up the difference between glucagon and glycogen

[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago

This but unironically, double checking prevents errors and you make more mental connections when you look things up.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

That's it. I don't intentionally memorise anything. Never could. I realised that path was not for me as a six-year old with a key part in the Nativity who remembered some of their lines but none in the right order. When it comes to my work, though, I'm like an encyclopaedia because I meaningfully engage with the same content so often that it sticks. (At least, I think that's what you're saying, minus the Nativity part.)

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago

the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

Honestly good. Students learn to just memorize what they need for the test and no further, then dump most of that afterwards. "memorizing" and retaining are different things

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If modern China's not bourgeois then explain this Dengists smuglord

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Prussian model of memorization and taking notes worked back when it was a small number of students learning from experts in niche areas. Now that we have printing presses and you are not expected to reference your college notes in your professional career the model has outlived it's usefulness

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is this really a thing is China? Holy shit, I knew our education sucked but I wasn't aware how much better it was elsewhere (probably because of said education system failing me)

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago

This is a very Mao thing, he hated people being too obsessed with reading and quoting rather than understanding and exploring. I don't think it's especially representative of modern China though, which has moved back towards the bourgeois memorization fetishism

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

Nowadays, no. GaoKao is basically all memorizing except for essays part of the exam. Even then, you have memorization to do to for the essays (structure, arguement, etc.)

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
206 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13878 readers
797 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS