[–] 19 points 5 hours ago* (1 child)

We both know that DSA isn't demcent; it needs more centralization to really develop its demcoracy, but it needs to avoid the errors of bureaucratic centralism too. A big part of the problem with DSA is big chapters like NYC and LA don't want to be democratic; they want to bureaucratically decide things and get rubber stamps from membership.

There's also advantages to handling some disagreements publicly: it renders line struggle visible to the masses.

Finally, as I alluded to above, some MLs like Mao have definitely been okay not just handling stuff internally.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 28 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

    You don't go public against one of your own people like that.

    You do. Even under socialism you do. Class struggle continues under socialist construction, and we aren't even at socialist construction.

    That said, I agree with your over all point: not a good sign!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 20 points 6 hours ago*

    This is part of problem with running for executive when you don't have the power to both support your electeds against your enemies.

    That said I think this is untested, maybe NYC DSA could successfully support him against the NYC establishment and the police, but they are too focused on economism. Politics needs to be in command.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 24 points 5 days ago*

    Great example of how ends and means are intertwined. The end isn't merely to have something that sounds like your voice read the baby book.

    The relationship is literally dialectical

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
    view more: next ›