You said:
their strategy is to elect social democrats who openly say they are capitalists.
You listed: (1) A man who DSA endorsed six years ago who doesn't identify as a capitalist. (2) An anti-zionist who calls himself a capitalist who isn't endorsed by DSA but has DSA people supporting him.
Neither of those things are what you said. You moved the goal posts or you weren't clear in your initial statement.
I think you bring up topics worth discussing, but if you cant be clear or can't admit you moved the goal posts I don't see how we can have a productive conversation.
Best of luck, comrade.
Neither El-Sayed or Bernie Sanders is in DSA. Neither are currently endorsed by DSA. If you want to move the goal post and discuss Sanders and El-Sayed I'm happy too.
But first, will you admit you couldn't name a DSA elected who has called themselves a capitalist?
Which DSA electeds call themselves capitalists?
This is trivially true. Any socialist formation can drop its demand to end capitalism. Many have.
Do you think it matters what's in a platform? Do you think you should characterize a formation by what's in it's platform or by what is not in it's platform?
"The opponents of DSA define it to hold a position other than what DSA says it holds, and I somehow think this is 'admitting' something."
Nonetheless, DSA explicitly states that their goal is to replace capitalism with socialism. Their program asks people to imagine a world without capitalism.
DSA is the boogey man they're pointing and DSA is clear that their democratic socialism is about ending capitalism and building socialism.
The democratic socialism column disagrees with DSA's platform in some key ways. In particular, DSA explicitly states capitalism needs to be replaced with socialism.
Yeah. I work a dumb low end white collar job, the thing it's suppose to help with, and I don't use it for work. I tried. It sucks even at writing emails cuz it lacks intentionality.
At most, I've used to ask for an Excel formula cuz they've shittified search engines
First he purged rightist employees (even his friends) working at Current Affairs to consolidate an editorial line under his leadership, now he reposts in support of Dengist developmentalism.
The libertarian socialist to Leninist pipeline is real.
Cars. Even on this site cars don't get enough hate.
spoiler
(More seriously, revolutionary defeatism is probably the correct stance along side solidarity with any indigenous and socialist resistance groups)
The guy who has a pattern of simping for right wing authoritarian fuckheads like Nettanyahu?
This guy? 
Agreed. I don't expect everyone to be leading with "death to United Snakes of Amerikkka" but socialist electeds need to lead on issues and sometimes those issues won't be popular yet...that's why they need leadership