[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Late 30s, so optimism was part of my introduction to the internet

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

Aren't most computer scientists more like technicians or engineers than actual scientists?

105
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
62
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
84
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

agony-deep

[-] [email protected] 70 points 2 months ago

Cars. Even on this site cars don't get enough hate.

69
Chinese Zhukov (hexbear.net)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

with weeb characteristics

48
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

big-cool

[-] [email protected] 69 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoiler(More seriously, revolutionary defeatism is probably the correct stance along side solidarity with any indigenous and socialist resistance groups)

[-] [email protected] 58 points 7 months ago

Based and multipolarity pilled

13
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I haven't finished it yet, but I can't remember the last time I've seen a CGTN video arguing an explicitly ideological position.

https://youtu.be/YHeJZ7VMCGo

35
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

We know the heads of Marxism are usually Marx, Engels and Lenin, often plus Stalin and Mao.

three-heads-thinking stalin-cig mao-wave

But who would be the five heads of revolutionary liberalism (before it became a totally bankrupt, anti-emancipatory, status quo project)?

My suggestion: John Locke, Thomas Paine, Robespierre, Toussaint, & Simon Bolivar

Also considered: Oliver Cromwell and Garibaldi

[-] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago

A conclusion of the Chair's (false) argument is that appealing to the working class doesn't win elections, therefore why should they be appeal to in the future

Dems preparing to move ever rightward

124
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
57
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Not sure what to make of this

25
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
122
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Brilliant move both not attending Netanyahu's speech and issuing this statement both-sides

13
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I like Draper's 1967 essay Who’s going to be the lesser-evil in 1968? but I think its dated references can be alienating to some people (even though the datedness of it kinda reinforces its argument).

[-] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago

how do you manage to be on the Right of the DSA??

One of DSA's co-chairs (highest elected leaders of the org) is a member of the caucus that wrote the "Do you commend Hamas?" article.

geordi-no cpusa

geordi-yes DSA

[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago

Never let these people put this on you. It's on them. If Trump wins, it's their fault for not advocating against genocide and for a different candidate.

They're the ones not making a pragmatic choice. The only thing they're choosing to do is scold people, which doesn't work.

And if we are irrational, if we aren't being pragmatic, then why do they think they could reason with us? If we're unreasonable and Biden is reasonable, then they should be directing their talk to him if they actually want to stop Trump.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Women often confuse these things for intelligent

The most sexist thing I've read all week

Edit: I didn't read the rest of the comment. Possible it gets more sexist

[-] [email protected] 96 points 2 years ago

The guy who has a pattern of simping for right wing authoritarian fuckheads like Nettanyahu?

This guy? biden-supervised

view more: next ›

Chapo_is_Red

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 years ago