Graduated college around 2010. It'll get marginally better. If you're lucky and get an advanced degree, you might get a job making 25$/hr like me (no bennies)
I for one want my space fascist thugs to only be non-binary
I think if she got redeemed, she'd need to give up her titles and privileges; completely reject her old ideology which was based in hereditary absolutism. That would never happen cuz it's made by libs.
I think Azula's a great villain. She's also just a kid so I want her to be redeemed...but I also do not want to see her redemption arc. We don't need to endlessly expand on past media.
They invented the computers Kirk tricks into burning themselves out with logic traps
They invented the opposite: a computer that when you logically trap it just goes "nuh-uh"
Agreed. I don't expect everyone to be leading with "death to United Snakes of Amerikkka" but socialist electeds need to lead on issues and sometimes those issues won't be popular yet...that's why they need leadership
You said:
their strategy is to elect social democrats who openly say they are capitalists.
You listed: (1) A man who DSA endorsed six years ago who doesn't identify as a capitalist. (2) An anti-zionist who calls himself a capitalist who isn't endorsed by DSA but has DSA people supporting him.
Neither of those things are what you said. You moved the goal posts or you weren't clear in your initial statement.
I think you bring up topics worth discussing, but if you cant be clear or can't admit you moved the goal posts I don't see how we can have a productive conversation.
Best of luck, comrade.
Neither El-Sayed or Bernie Sanders is in DSA. Neither are currently endorsed by DSA. If you want to move the goal post and discuss Sanders and El-Sayed I'm happy too.
But first, will you admit you couldn't name a DSA elected who has called themselves a capitalist?
Which DSA electeds call themselves capitalists?
This is trivially true. Any socialist formation can drop its demand to end capitalism. Many have.
Do you think it matters what's in a platform? Do you think you should characterize a formation by what's in it's platform or by what is not in it's platform?
"The opponents of DSA define it to hold a position other than what DSA says it holds, and I somehow think this is 'admitting' something."
Nonetheless, DSA explicitly states that their goal is to replace capitalism with socialism. Their program asks people to imagine a world without capitalism.
DSA is the boogey man they're pointing and DSA is clear that their democratic socialism is about ending capitalism and building socialism.
