Edit: As @bdonvr@thelemmy.club points out below

  1. This is just a mascot and is not a new logo
  2. The blog referencing Mozilla’s statement on the mascots gender says, (he/she/they/them/it), use whatever pronoun you prefer.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 207 points 4 months ago (22 children)

The gender orientation of the firefox logo is something I haven't thought about ever.

What's the point of this?

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    The point is that you've fallen for some idiots on X making up culture war bullshit.

    Kit's supposed pronouns aren't mentioned by Mozilla anywhere in any Mozilla announcements.

    One news site attributes this quote to Mozilla

    Kit (he/she/they/them/it) is the user’s constant companion. Wherever they choose to roam, Kit will accompany and guide them with clever, playful encouragement and support — giving the user the confidence to run free.

    That's the one and only place that even remotely mentions it as far as I can tell. And it's not even a statement that it's NB or they/them... More like it's a fictional mascot call it what you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Mozilla uses "they're" to refer to Kit, but other than that there's no explicit statement at all.

    Kit is a companion, not a commentator. They’re not here to deliver punchlines. Kit shows up as a small signal that Firefox is working for you, then steps back so you can keep moving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    True, it was just "a fox" for me so far. I didn't really care about the gender of a drawing. I guess it is a good awareness move though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's a distraction from the real important issue, which is...

    ...what does the fox say? /j

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    Well, if I was creating a mascot, and I didn't want to think about their gender orientation... they/them pronouns are what I would use. Mozilla actually didn't announce the mascot's gender. People just saw they/them pronouns and made the inference from there.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    By the way this is NOT a new Firefox logo. It's just the fox mascot drawing that may be used in other parts of the UI like the welcome screen after a new install, or on social media.

    The actual logo remains unchanged.

    On top of that nowhere in the announcement are the supposed pronouns mentioned: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/meet-kit/

    Actually the whole thing may be bullshit. Literally the only Mozilla reference I can find to Kit's pronouns is a statement given to like one or two blogs, and it says that any pronoun is acceptable.

    Kit (he/she/they/them/it) is the user’s constant companion. Wherever they choose to roam, Kit will accompany and guide them with clever, playful encouragement and support — giving the user the confidence to run free.

    That's attributed to Mozilla here: https://www.neowin.net/news/firefox-has-killed-its-old-mascot-heres-what-the-new-cute-one-looks-like/

    All other references seem to be chuds on X claiming that it's explicitly they/them and acting like Mozilla is making a big deal about that. As if it matters either way.

    If you had some kind of reaction to this post you've fallen for culture war bullshit propaganda, congratulations.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 77 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Firefox is now exclusive to ternary computers.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 52 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    What if.... hear me out.... what if we remove the focus on gender altogether? What if we stop engendering things that don't have genders? Like logos... and behavioral attributes...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 38 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Waterfox needs to catch up with a gender-fluid fox

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 30 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Isn't the old mascot/logo completely non-gendered already?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That's stupid, it was genderless before until they brought it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    The old one was also non-binary. Prove me wrong.

    (Honestly, I just don't care. Load the web page and render some JavaScript already)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 21 points 4 months ago

    Maybe it’s meant to run on the old Soviet Setun platform.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    It's a fox. I like the fox.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 4 months ago

    Are telling me they fired the previous mascot to hire a gender minority? Smh

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    I never knew or thought about the old one's gender.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Has anyone even thought about the gender of the original?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    mascots gender says

    It's a fucking red panda.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Non-binary PC is just a quantum computer innit?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    It uses qubits sorry. Get a quantum computer loser

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    I have a friend IRL called Kit, who also happens to use they/them pronouns.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    At risk of being abrasive...

    I see blue checkmarks, I downvote. Nothing personal. But I don't want to support that even indirectly.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 10 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Because it was what before? Why do we care about the gender identity of the fox mascot of a web browser?

    Don’t answer, please

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Distraction from being a shit corporation.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    It's not just a binary. It's a BLOB!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Kit looks more she/her than the OG icon.

    Hmm.. ..the silliness continues.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    the four genders are 00, 01, 10, and 11.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›