The gender orientation of the firefox logo is something I haven't thought about ever.
What's the point of this?
The gender orientation of the firefox logo is something I haven't thought about ever.
What's the point of this?
By the way this is NOT a new Firefox logo. It's just the fox mascot drawing that may be used in other parts of the UI like the welcome screen after a new install, or on social media.

The actual logo remains unchanged.
On top of that nowhere in the announcement are the supposed pronouns mentioned: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/meet-kit/
Actually the whole thing may be bullshit. Literally the only Mozilla reference I can find to Kit's pronouns is a statement given to like one or two blogs, and it says that any pronoun is acceptable.
Kit (he/she/they/them/it) is the user’s constant companion. Wherever they choose to roam, Kit will accompany and guide them with clever, playful encouragement and support — giving the user the confidence to run free.
That's attributed to Mozilla here: https://www.neowin.net/news/firefox-has-killed-its-old-mascot-heres-what-the-new-cute-one-looks-like/
All other references seem to be chuds on X claiming that it's explicitly they/them and acting like Mozilla is making a big deal about that. As if it matters either way.
If you had some kind of reaction to this post you've fallen for culture war bullshit propaganda, congratulations.
Solid sleuthing there. Edited the post to include your context.
Firefox is now exclusive to ternary computers.
What if.... hear me out.... what if we remove the focus on gender altogether? What if we stop engendering things that don't have genders? Like logos... and behavioral attributes...
Since Mozilla actually didn’t and the post is based on a lie, I’ll say congratulations, your reaction is almost certainly what they were hoping for
Waterfox needs to catch up with a gender-fluid fox
Wait, there is a Waterfox? Is there also an Earth and Air fox? Then we could have an AvatarFox!
Isn't the old mascot/logo completely non-gendered already?
There was nothing like that with the old fox-that-is-on-fire, so I guess mozilla is making a statement by pointing it out.
That's stupid, it was genderless before until they brought it up.
The old one was also non-binary. Prove me wrong.
(Honestly, I just don't care. Load the web page and render some JavaScript already)
Just search for "Firefox Chan". And maybe keep on SafeSearch too...
It's a fox. I like the fox.
Are telling me they fired the previous mascot to hire a gender minority? Smh
Has anyone even thought about the gender of the original?
mascots gender says
It's a fucking red panda.
Non-binary PC is just a quantum computer innit?
I have a friend IRL called Kit, who also happens to use they/them pronouns.
At risk of being abrasive...
I see blue checkmarks, I downvote. Nothing personal. But I don't want to support that even indirectly.
Because it was what before? Why do we care about the gender identity of the fox mascot of a web browser?
Don’t answer, please
Kit looks more she/her than the OG icon.
Hmm.. ..the silliness continues.
Kit looks more she/her than the OG icon.
NBs don't have to be androgynous.
the four genders are 00, 01, 10, and 11.
That's not even a full byte! Surely we can spare 6 more bits and support 255 genders.
top 50 comments