▲ 987 ▼ Good luck figuring it out since it also doesn’t come with man pages (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/memes@sopuli.xyz 182 comments fedilink hide all child comments Edit: As @bdonvr@thelemmy.club points out below This is just a mascot and is not a new logo The blog referencing Mozilla’s statement on the mascots gender says, (he/she/they/them/it), use whatever pronoun you prefer.
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 4 months ago (1 child) Isn't the old mascot/logo completely non-gendered already? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 8 points 4 months ago (3 children) There was nothing like that with the old fox-that-is-on-fire, so I guess mozilla is making a statement by pointing it out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bdonvr 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) Except there's basically nowhere that Mozilla actually does. The post is misinformation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 point 4 months ago in both the intro blog post and the branding guidelines mozilla does bring up the new (complimentary; not replacement) mascots pronouns as explicitly non-binary permalink fedilink source parent [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago I kinda wish that they had pointed it out, but they didn't. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago Except it's not pointing it out, OP is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] markz@suppo.fi 8 points 4 months ago (3 children) There was nothing like that with the old fox-that-is-on-fire, so I guess mozilla is making a statement by pointing it out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bdonvr 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) Except there's basically nowhere that Mozilla actually does. The post is misinformation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 point 4 months ago in both the intro blog post and the branding guidelines mozilla does bring up the new (complimentary; not replacement) mascots pronouns as explicitly non-binary permalink fedilink source parent [–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago I kinda wish that they had pointed it out, but they didn't. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago Except it's not pointing it out, OP is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bdonvr 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) Except there's basically nowhere that Mozilla actually does. The post is misinformation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 point 4 months ago in both the intro blog post and the branding guidelines mozilla does bring up the new (complimentary; not replacement) mascots pronouns as explicitly non-binary permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 point 4 months ago in both the intro blog post and the branding guidelines mozilla does bring up the new (complimentary; not replacement) mascots pronouns as explicitly non-binary permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago I kinda wish that they had pointed it out, but they didn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago Except it's not pointing it out, OP is permalink fedilink source parent
