Here's a Bluesky thread by another trans Green party memeber that I think is worth considering.
This is straight up misinformation, btw. There is no evidence that the Jewish Greens were involved with stalling the vote on this motion, David Miller (an actual antisemite) doesn't provide any evidence. Their actual position on the motion is mixed.
You don't have to be subscribed to see activities in a community (including downvotes) but someone on you instance does for the community know to send the activities to that instance.
Disabling downvotes doesn't actually prevent items being downvoted, it just hides them from those that don't want to see it.
Disabling donvotes in the instance setting does prevent them being recorded on that instance. You can see the code here.
track downvotes from outside instances
No, Lemmy just forwards the downvote to the community's subscribers, so other instances receive them. The downvote is not written to the db on instances with it disabled.
Provenance has never been something you can guarantee with code in an open contribution model (which is not the only way of governing an open source project). For all you know the code could be copy and pasted from a proprietary codebase, or be the product of third party who's work is being plagiarised by the submitter. A software project is ultimately a community and is build on trust and faith that people are acting in good faith. The kind of person who would deliberately (and gleefully as I've seen in some social media posts) go into a community and violate its stated values and standards, no matter how arbitrary and illegitimate they feel those are, has bigger character flaws to worry about than their reliance on stochastic parrots to write code.
'No AI' rules are ultimately about fostering certain community values and norms than guaranteeing no LLM code makes it in.
This is just the year of by-elections. This will be what, the fourth Parliamentary by-election, with potentially another Farage one on the way.
A switch of US position would represent a psychological blow to Britain’s sovereignty over the Falklands.
Why would it? I get that it would strain relations, but the UK's sovereignty and legitimacy over the islands are about as ironclad as you can get.
AI code bans may be impossible to enforce in the first place
I hate this attitude that if a rule or standard can't be enforced perfectly, we shouldn't strive for it. We can't (reasonably) run an OS free of proprietary software, does that mean the free software movement should just give up?
!rwby@sh.itjust.works has been weirdly active lately, which is a nice surprise. I would've thought the community would be mostly dormant until Volume 10.
Likewise, it's possible that it may be able to generate AI child porn without any actual child porn in its training dataset, but if it knows what children look like and what nudity looks like, then it could figure out what nude children look like.
This is true and it's what happened to OpenAI, there's a section in Karen Hao's Empire of AI about it. Remember, these companies (under) paid Kenyan workers and gave them PTSD to make sure CSAM and other undesirable content wasn't in their training set.
Sure why not. It doesn't happen very often anyway, AI people are pretty good at keeping to their own spaces here.
A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.
Lol, they added 'Grok is this true' to the entire platform, just dead on arrival.