this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
203 points (100.0% liked)

news

23537 readers
50 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 year ago

If you've ever wondered what you'd do during a genocide the answer is whatever you're doing now

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ah i was wondering when they'd figure out how to be worse

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What have you done??? You’ve just challenged the Jesus to one up this

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Oh no we banned Jesus years ago for hanging out with cops. We use the Lathe of Heaven to speak fresh man-made horrors in to existence on Hexbear.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Genuinely thought this was an Onion headline

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it's not genocide, it's a war against hamas -> those weren't innocents, they were secretly hamas -> all palestinians are hamas -> this shit

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

As usual, the libs have created an impossible to escape rhetorical hole. They can't criticize this except to point out that's it's racist, which can easily be countered by leaning on the consensus that even the idea of Palestinian freedom and autonomy is antisemitic. They've already made this particular racist act completely acceptable by spending several decades acting like Jewish and Palestinian lives are mutually exclusive. The libs also can't critique racism in general because then they have to act like tankies and critique how capitalist power is maintained. They can say racism is bad, but they can't say why. Rightwingers will just say it's good, and the reason it's good is because it punishes the scapegoat.

Sorry. This is just a small brain dump. I occasionally see some new aspect of the complete irrationality of the environment I'm living in and I want to articulate it. In this case it's the constant assertion that like capitalism, there is no alternative to Israeli violence in Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the movie SHOOTER, Mark Wahlberg plays Bob Lee Swagger, an ex-marine, who kills a sitting US Senator

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't believe Mark Wahlberg would take a role like that, everything else he does is too fedposting. Unless, what, was the senator Vietnamese or something?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Senator was corrupt and working for oil companies, and made Wahlberg's character unknowingly complicit in war crimes, which made him mad.

Note that it's not because of the war crimes, but because of the corruption, that Wahlberg's character does what he does

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Senator was corrupt and working for oil companies

Haven't watched this movie but I take it they present this as the exception rather than the rule?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Think so, been a while since I've seen it and it's probably not good enough to merit a rewatch

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it's not, really. he's sort of the untouchable head of the snake in the movie conflict, but it portrays an organization with deep military, intelligence community, and private security ties engaging in mass murder and assassination to maintain profit.

after being cut loose from some military black op, Markus Mark becomes disillusioned with the US and is a weirdo living in the middle of nowhere for years until he gets pulled into a conspiracy / frame as a lone gunman. the movie is about him on the run and trying to get clear of it all.

it's not a brilliant achievement in film, but it's pretty fun action conspiracy flick about one guy with uncanny ability to survive dog shit scenarios and fire a rifle long distance in a very bleak world. it's got a buddy-cop angle to it, because he pairs up with this junior/nobody FBI guy who is torching his career by questioning the line gunman narrative.

I totally endorse it as a fun pop corn movie. has a few banger lines and some cheesy ones.

the "still got the shovel" line always makes me laugh

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

another serving of fascism so soon? but i can barely choke down the last...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here comes the camp transport train!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

geordi-no trains of ANY kind

geordi-yes subcontracting uber and lyft drivers to cart people to the camps

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Welcome to wwiii it's already started. Fuck everything. Help people.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Its difficult to pinpoint when WWIII began. Scholars at the Lenin-Zedong Historical Institute have put forth various arguements for diffferent dates. Many tend to consider the Russian Federation's recognition of the Donbas Republics and the ensuing proxy war with the US Imperialist Order. Some counter that this conflict began with the Euromaiden coup in 2014 and perfer to use this date.

A different faction, while acknowledging the importance of the Ukrainian Proxy War (of 2022 or of 2014 as mentioned is its own seperate debate) Many Historians prefer the 2023 Gazan uprising and the subsequent horriffic reprisal carried out by the US client state of Israel, who had been carrying out a policy of apartheid against the native Palestinian population so extreme that Gaza earned the epitaph of the "Largest Open Air Prison in the World."

While scholars may disagree about the date. They, like we all, honor the sacrifice of these various peoples' against the US Imperialist Order which led to its downfall, and the eventual creation of the better world first envisioned by Marx and Engels we all enjoy today.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't know the exact start, which will be decided by the survivors (if there are any) I guess, but I do think it's already begun.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I agree, unfortunately

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

it started with the assassination of the archduke Qasem Soleimani

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

” This is the most anti-Hamas immigration legislation I have seen and it’s well deserved.”

Re. Ryan Zinke (R-Wannsee)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

So basically admitting he didn't write the bill. Who peddled it in front of him? AIPAC?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Its a day ending in ‘Y’

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did Trump need a because when he tried the Muslim ban in 2017? Republicans don't care about the why, they just want to inflict harm on anyone that isn't a straight white male billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Hamas is the latest boogeyman.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

the islamophobia that followed in the wake of 9/11 and the wars in the middle east

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Because the US govt is composed of genocidal shits, that's why

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please put the mask back on! PLEASE PUT THE MASK BACK ON!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

What a fucking ghoul

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Overt racists can go to the gulag

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Covert racists too

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They really said "hmm... the Dems have been pretty mask off lately, how can we be worse?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

More Nazi shit, as usual.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Okay who the fuck was on the lathe

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

It probably means more of them would come to Latin America. We already have more than US does anyway.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US doesn't recognize Palestine as a State so I guess they're just gonna drop off loads of Palestinians in Israel then?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Step 1: Make a law expelling all Palestinians Step 2: Attempt to expel them to Israel Step 3: Israel does not accept them (no right to return for Palestinians) Step 4: Oh no, guess we're out of options, there's only one thing left to do! Step 5: Concentration camps

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›