Jimmy Kimmel Dead
The Show with the Late Stephen Colbert
Jimmy Kimmel Dead
The Show with the Late Stephen Colbert
My friends: "If you hate America so much, why do you still live here?"
Me, aloud: "I don't have any money."
Me, muttering: "If you love your children so much, why are you raising them here?"
Some books on my infinite to-read list:
The Anti-Social Family, by Michèle Barrett and Mary McIntosh
Abolish the Family:A Manifesto for Care and Liberation, by Sophie Lewis
No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, by Lee Edelman
I'm not sure why people are doubting you - we just had a thread where many people mentioned the failure to adopt computers as a reason for the fall of the USSR. @[email protected] recommended this video: Why Didn't the Soviets Automate Their Economy?: Cybernetics in the USSR, by the Marxist Project, which comes with a
bibliography
Abramov, Roman Nikolaevich. 2016. “Soviet Technocratic Mythologies as a Form of the ‘Theory of Missed Opportunities:’ On the Example of the History of Cybernetics in the USSR.” Sociology of Science and Technology 8 (2): 61–78.
“Computers to Improve Soviet Industrial Management.” 1965. Central Intelligence Agency.
Gerovitch, Slava. 2008. “InterNyet: Why the Soviet Union Did Not Build a Nationwide Computer Network.” History and Technology 24 (4): 335-350.
Peters, Benjamin. 2016. How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet. The MITPress.
Safronov, Alexei Vasilievich. 2020. “Computerization of the Planned Economy in the USSR: Projects of Scientists and the Needs of Practitioners.” Sociology of Science and Technology 11 (3): 22–41.
Safronov, Alexei Vasilievich. 2022. “Bureaucratic and Technological Limitations of Computerization of Planning in the USSR.” Economicheskaya Politika 17 (2): 120–45.
Trachtenberg, Anna Davidovna. 2006. “The Myth of the Greatness of Electricity Within the Soviet Technocratic Utopia: Glushkov’s ‘OGAS’ [ Миф о Величии Электричества в Рамках Советской Технократической Утопии: «ОГАС» Академика Глушкова.].” Discourse-P 6 (1): 45–47.
Dwyane Wade's, since he's already worked in Florida
Looks like a clear case of excited delirium to me
Does MOH = medicinal overuse headache here, or something else? Whoa. I never considered that and thought that the supplements that give me problems were due to other factors.
I hate anti-monarchists because I am the rightful heir of the true king of the realm, but was raised by shepherds or wolves or found in a basket or something.
Our hero is so hot and charming that tabloids call them "The Social Model of Disability"
Do you know which ingredients in the vitamin pills trigger your migraines? Is there a migraine-safe meal replacement beverage? I've had bad luck with such things, too, and going through trial-and-error when the "error" leads to a day or more of excruciating pain is ... well, you know how it is.
There are so many Catch-22s and minefields to navigate when trying to avoid migraine triggers, and most doctors who aren't headache specialists simply refuse to understand.
FAIR.org with a takedown of the original NYT article about Singham from two years ago
Rubio was mad about it:
So it should come as no surprise that the piece has led to a call for a federal investigation into those Singham-funded nonprofits. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) sent a letter to the Justice Department citing the Times article and arguing that the groups, including the antiwar organization Code Pink and the socialist think tank Tricontinental, “have been receiving direction from the CCP [Chinese Communist Party].” Rubio concluded, “The CCP is our greatest adversary, and we cannot allow it to abuse our open system to promote its malign influence any longer.”
Sigh:
If you think China is evil and Communists are the devil—as you might, if you read US corporate news media (FAIR.org, 5/15/20, 4/8/21)—this sounds like important reporting on a dangerous man. The trouble is, there’s nothing illegal about any of this. All the Times succeeds in proving in this article is that Singham puts considerable money, amassed by selling a software company, toward causes that promote positive views of China and are critical of hawkish anti-China foreign policy, which is his right as an US citizen. If you were to replace “China” in this tale with “Ukraine,” it’s hard to imagine the Times assigning a single reporter to the story, let alone putting it on the front page.
When . . . will . . . they . . .crack??!?!?!?