94
submitted 20 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I blame Antifa.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 13 hours ago

Maybe the answer is more austerity?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 35 points 15 hours ago

Oh no such sudden population decline will be catastrophic

Anyway let's kill immigrants trust me it will fix something

[-] [email protected] 34 points 15 hours ago

No paid leave for parenting, and that is just the tip of the iceberg of parenthood problems in an atomizing society, what do they expect?

[-] [email protected] 24 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yeah all thw other comments on here I agree with but.... Have you seen the men thats-why-im-confused There's even more redpill brainrot around and mf use AI to chat with women. Can you truly blame women its slim pickings thats-why-im-confused

[-] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago

big assumption that men want kids either outside of some extra freak conservative groups

[-] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

personally speaking I'd prefer a robot dog with a gun

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

as many as we can operate

[-] [email protected] 37 points 16 hours ago

Ummm…porky, no one OWES you kids. Stop being so entitled!

smuglord

[-] [email protected] 48 points 17 hours ago

thats why they want to control women.

Women control birth rates and can choke the machine.

They don't really have an answer to the natural reaction to austerity. Women can just stop fucking the loser men who support it and/or just stop having kids entirely.

That's why theyre pushing all this religious crap.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 16 hours ago

Redpilling the youths is backfiring because the men buy it and the women don't.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

She might give Mitt Romney a chance, but not someone who is far right.

[-] [email protected] 89 points 19 hours ago

Remember back in the 90s when the message was that overpopulation will starve us all and now that the birth rate is declining in response to environmental and economic stress that's an equally huge crisis

[-] [email protected] 54 points 19 hours ago

What a cool, stable economic system

[-] [email protected] 34 points 17 hours ago

Shhh if we talk about it too loudly the stockmen will get skittish and might balk, causing an economic downturn because they reacted to the possibility of one by dialing up the rat fucking in anticipation, heightening tensions and contradictions, and invariably causing a hiccup with a plethora of aftershocks.

It’s in the rulebook

[-] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago

Really cool how the porks are never ever at fault for anything despite literally being the authority.

“Aww sorry kiddo, no job for you! I scare easy and growing jobs numbers might make the money sad! Too risky!”

At the very least, these lazy ceos should be fired for gross incompetence. They failed to put the masses to work and should be fired for their incompetence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 15 hours ago

yeh ok good

[-] [email protected] 63 points 19 hours ago

I remember over the summer hearing on NPR (mandatory puke sounds) about how the fertility rates are dropping below replacement everywhere (it's not) and nobody knows why (we do)

Nobody has a single clue as to why this could possibly be happening!?!!!!!1!!!?! Why does no one wanna kids!?!?!?!

Anyway it was real fucking frustrating to have pundits and the supersmart scientists dancing around the causes and painting all the white countries having declining birthrates as the biggest existential problem the world has ever known.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 18 hours ago

Animals in captivity usually don't breed in large numbers. The animals we domesticated historically were the handful of weird species that would breed in captivity.

Humans are animals. The more and more people feel they are in captivity, the fewer children they will have.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

The animals we domesticated historically were the handful of weird species that would breed in captivity.

Do you have a citation for this claim? My understanding from work experience when I was younger is that in modern agriculture, most stock is forcibly bred.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 19 hours ago

This kind of response makes perfect sense when you can't question underlying capitalist relations as being the source of the problem.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 19 hours ago

Yeah and it hurts so badly when you're forced to listen to libs orbit around the obvious problem but never able to see it or address it.

Just a series of unfortunate events, odd happenings co-occuring. Nobody knows how to put the peices together, and you can't either - don't try - since our smart well paid scientists tell us they're just as stumped as we are.

xi-gun

[-] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago

since our smart well paid scientists tell us they're just as stumped as we are.

When . . . will . . . they . . .crack??!?!?!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 77 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Made me realize, the nuclear family is a failed concept under capitalism. When every facet of raising children is commodified, the working class is going to just stop having children. Though I also think there is a psychological factor to it too, with the alienation under capitalism making one question what is the purpose of bring a child into this world. And yet all of this is necessary for capitalism to reproduce itself, which is a huge contradiction that is only alleviated a bit by immigration.

Besides Engels' book, is there any other marxist analysis of the family structure?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

Martha Gimenez 'Marx, Women, and Social Reproduction' is hands down the best marxist analysis of gender and the family I have read.

https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1355-marx-women-and-capitalist-social-reproduction

[-] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago

And that’s ignoring climate change

I’m not gonna bring a child into a world on fire

[-] [email protected] 27 points 19 hours ago

Some books on my infinite to-read list:

The Anti-Social Family, by Michèle Barrett and Mary McIntosh

Abolish the Family:A Manifesto for Care and Liberation, by Sophie Lewis

No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, by Lee Edelman

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 19 hours ago

My children shall remain non-existent because they deserve a better future than what America will provide them with

[-] [email protected] 49 points 19 hours ago

My friends: "If you hate America so much, why do you still live here?"

Me, aloud: "I don't have any money."

Me, muttering: "If you love your children so much, why are you raising them here?"

[-] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago

Basically.

Personally, I think I’d be a fine parent as long as I get my shit together (and a fuckton of therapy.)

And it is for that reason I think that if I got a gf and pissed out a baby now, especially in Amerikkka, I’d be worried the pearly gates would flag me for child abuse just for that.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

My wife and I just don't want kids in general, but even if we did this would completely put a stop in any plans. It feels morally reprehensible to bring up a kid in this country today.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Those Who Didn't Have The Means to Leave Omelas But Fuck If They're Gonna Socially Reproduce It

[-] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

it's the phones.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 19 hours ago

porky-happy : Capitalism is so good and freedom-inducing that we'll continue raising prices and worsening material conditions for the working class. Want a family? You gotta hustle and work 900000+ jobs to earn a fifth of what 1 job could have earned you before

porky-scared-flipped : WHY AREN'T YOU MAKING BABIES

[-] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago

I will never stop being stupified that an airline pilot had enough money to essentially raise 3 families, and they often did!

[-] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

Those statistics are skewed by Airline Steve who had 15,000 families, one for each airport in America

[-] [email protected] 35 points 19 hours ago

It's really expensive here and I didn't have to pay a dime for the hospital and clinic visits or delivery or anything. I truly dont know how US people do it

[-] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

The people I know with kids started families in their 30s when they had 2 partners with PMC jobs and lived near grandparents or other extended family. The boomers were able to have kids in their 20s and buy a house with one full time income. Shit is totally unsustainable.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago

It was also way more common for relatives/neighbours to watch & take care of the kids if the parents were busy. It does take a village to raise a child and now the village got bulldozed for 8-lanes of traffic and black and white condoslop.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

Yeah the dissolution of community is a big part. I remember when Sister Hillary had a book titled "It Takes a Village" and people were roasting her, but the people lambasting her grew up with that extended support! They might even talk about how it used to be that way!, and then not make the connection that losing that informal extended support is a factor in people having fewer kids or having kids later.

Something else that I think disrupts this is the expectation that people will have to move away from their home towns and families to become established economically. And even have to pick up stakes and make significant moves every few years to maintain their standard of living through moving for jobs. Capitalism has uprooted people and now the upshot is that people aren't reproducing the workers, this is not complicated to savvy.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 19 hours ago

A lot of us don't. I mean I guess that's the point of the article. My partner and I have said for years "maybe, someday, when we can afford it" and just... never could afford it. Now pushing 40 and still can't. A kid would be a catastrophic cost for us at the moment. Simple as.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

The article kind of contradicts itself. Near the start I believe it mentioned how it wasn’t just a delay in births, but then when it gets down to the changes based on age, it very much indicates a delay, in that women below the age of 30 had a significant decline, but early 30s is the same and 35 and beyond is greater. Yes this is a decline since it’s harder to have a child past a certain age but it’s mostly a delay for now, although considering how our economy is also declining, this trend will increase

[-] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, I think the economic decline is the key bit here. People who aren't having kids in their 20s, aren't likely to have kids later in life either because their economic situation isn't going to improve.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 18 hours ago

feeling mildly better about not being able to bear a child knowing that even if i was physically capable of doing so i would never be financially capable of it

[-] [email protected] 19 points 19 hours ago

I love the "(at least arguably) good news presented as catastrophic because of the inherent contradictions of capitalism" genre of reporting

[-] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago

They need that to go along with the “everything is fine, bad things are good” Steven Pinker style slop

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
94 points (100.0% liked)

news

24344 readers
980 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS