634
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The trustee overseeing Infowars host Alex Jones’ personal bankruptcy case is accusing the far-right conspiracy theorist of trying to shield more than $5 million from creditors, including relatives of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut.

Three new lawsuits filed by the trustee on Friday alleging fraudulent asset transfers are the latest developments in Jones’ long-running bankruptcy case, which has been pending in federal court in Houston for more than two years. In financial statements filed in bankruptcy court last year, Jones listed his net worth at $8.4 million.

The Sandy Hook families won nearly $1.5 billion in judgments in 2022 in lawsuits filed in Connecticut and Texas accusing Jones of defamation and emotional distress for saying the school shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators was a hoax. Victims’ relatives testified in court about being terrorized by Jones’ supporters.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

He owes $1.5 billion. He shouldn't have anything, ANYTHING. Take everything he has, and leave him homeless, penniless, and naked.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Thanks but we don’t want to see him naked

[-] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

Once he's naked, he would need to he arrested again for indecent exposure.

[-] [email protected] 97 points 1 day ago

It shouldn't be hard to prove. He was talking about it on air at different points.

[-] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's already proven and decided. Not only was it proven. He's continued to make the same claims post-judgement. Completely unrepentant.

It's getting him to actually pay the penalties that's turning out to be the difficult part.

He shifts assets to under his father's name. He lies about the size of his assets. He makes side deals with external funders to outbid buyers and gift assets back to him. He's just a bad dude.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

I'm not talking about that part of it, I'm talking about the shifting of assets. He has openly talked about how he is doing that on the air.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Not just talking about it, bragging about how people shouldn't go to the IW store, but now Alex Jones Inc or some stupid garbage.

I really think he's trying to see how far he can go before he forced them to do something on air like he's been edging himself for over the last decade of secretly being the thing he's ranted about all these years.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

It's the epitome of confidently incorrect. It's like he thinks he has found a loophole and is bragging about it.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

We already know he lies on air. I'm not saying he's lying but him doing so to get more people to buy his shitty products is very plausible.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

Dan over at Knowledge Fight has been cataloging how Alex has been working to (lazily) shield his assets for at least a year or two now. He's barely trying to hide it at all, and is basically telegraphing this on air and almost feels like he's trying to give them more ammo against him, but he is also very stupid.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

Perhaps he's lazily hiding some of his assets in plain and obvious ways to throw the courts off the scent of stuff he's shielding more effectively and discretely.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Some sodomite sent me a bucket of poop.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I RENOUNCE JESUS CHRIST!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

And here come the sex robots

[-] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

I'm tired of them pretending they're the good guys saying we're the bad guys.

I love you.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago

Lol everything he has done in these lawsuits was for the sole purpose to hide his money.

5 different corporate representatives were sent and the court ruled every single testimony of those as non responsive to discovery. The last corporate rep to testify was a hired outside lawyer with no experience in civil law, no familiarity with Texas law and had no experience in financial matters. Why would you send someone as your corporate representative, who has no idea what's going on, or any experience in relevant fields? To obscure the process of discovery and to hide the money.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Literally just need to hire a PI to follow him and you’ll get lots of proof of what he’s hiding

[-] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

Just listen to the show. He has been openly transferring customers to a different store that is "completely unrelated" to Alex Jones companies and he "doesn't have a stake in". Except that it's his dad's website and all the paperwork is in the names of employees of Alex. He wasn't even trying to hide it. Completely, nakedly trying to hide assets.

They are just going to play him back to himself in court and say to his lawyer "is this your client?" Open and shut case.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Different right wing nut job. This one is the one about chem trails.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Knowing Alex, no shock.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

They’ve mentioned fraud. Is this a criminal trial? Please be a criminal trial!

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Because Infowars’ assets are still tied up in the courts, Jones has been allowed to continue broadcasting his shows and hawking merchandise from Infowars’ Austin studio.

Well that's infuriating. Also bonus points for the AP trying to stay neutral and then throwing in the word "hawking".

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Looks at the calendar

I mean he clearly has shielded them since there's still no payout. Incredible journalism.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

IANAL but it seems like he’s really skirting the law here. Like I think it can be a felony.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

That's a tiny hand

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
634 points (99.2% liked)

News

30307 readers
3544 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS