DeBeers used this strategy for decades and it's worked out for them.
Line of organized capital must go up.
Fuck humans if line goes up. Fuck humans if line goes down.
Humans, generally speaking, tend to give more credit to facts that already aligned with their pre-conceived beliefs than facts that are not.
This isn't exclusive to conservatives and liberals fall into this trap as well.
The problem is that Fox News and conservative media have figured out how to take advantage of it to further their agenda.
In fact, the RNC and Fox News has done an absolutely fantastic job of convincing their base that educated people shouldn't be trusted because they are liberal.
You're a good lemming!
The source of the image has been cut off.

The main reason is that you don't know what rights you might be giving up in the future.
There was controversy when v3 was released that it closed the loop hole for companies to technically be in compliance of GPL but locked people out by using encryption keys. FOSS people, of course, said this was needed due to companies like TiVo at the time using hardware keys to prevent people from boot loading their own firmware when they were using Linux.
Torvalds supported the version but did not want to relicense Linux to force companies to stop the practice. And look were we are now: tivoisation is everywhere from Pixel to routers to tractors.
Your point that FSF is likely to make improvements of the license is valid, but you always want to make sure that you agree with the new license. They could, in future versions, say that by using the license, you transfer your rights to FSF.
Better to be explicit with the version you agree with and then relicense if needed.
That is correct.
Yeah, I don't recommend anyone using GPL x "or newer". I explicitly use AGPL 3 for most code.
I'll provide my perspective from a very strong advocate of FOSS and GPL specifically.
Most code I write I release under GPL because I want companies to think twice before attempting to profit off of my code. AGPL specifically requires companies to release any modifications if they are publicly released.
I will occasionally release some code under MIT because the code is so simple and stupid, I don't care enough if people lift it. A few spreadsheet formulas fall into this category or a dockerfile that has maybe 4 lines in it.
It's actually a bit more selfish than that. If someone else is doing better, and they view that someone as "beneath" them, they see it as "wasted" and whatever is making that someone better should be taken away.
It's explaining a reality that disagrees with the pre-conceived beliefs. The reason why Facebook works is that the algorithm makes it so it feeds them information that they already believe.
Those people don't see it as worse. They see it as "if we can get back to these old times, things would be better!" But what they forget to add is "for me!"
They want oppression for others because it means they are on top.