You know, if they did nothing wrong, there's nothing for them to worry about.
Ffs this is like the caravan of immigrants that are always on their way to the boarder and suddenly disappear the day after election day.
The only way these flock cameras are coming down legally is if people use the cameras against their local council.
Use the various means to get into the cameras or just set up shop outside their comes and note what time they go in and out of their home. Note their children's clothes, what school they go to and their car license plate numbers.
Provide print outs and distribute them at the meeting. Be sure to have them for the news people outside.
Council members think they are special and aren't going to be targeted by Flock. We need to show them that the laws that work for Flock work for us too.
You know, a year or so ago, a bunch of banks got all pissy that people were using their credit cards to buy porn games and ended up blocking their transactions.
Seems like, I don't know, if banks don't like AI agents interacting with their customers, they could block transactions made by companies that use AI.
Right? Because what's good for the goose is good for the soulless corporations that are burning our planet for short term quarterly gains, right?
Democrats are so afraid of offending the moderates that they lost sight of the fact that they are offending liberals and progressives.
There are two parts of this really and I think I'd be remissed if we gloss over one over the legit fear that women have.
First off: if you are a man (or masc presenting) and you aren't sensitive to the fact that women don't feel safe around men in general, then you are part of the problem. A lot of men in this category feel like they are "special" and "not that guy" and even though that may be true there is no way for women to know that without knowing you. So being considerate and honoring whatever boundaries women share with you goes a long way.
Being considerate also means having empathy for the fact that women feel unsafe around men. Take that into account in your approach with women. I always ask "Hey, do you mind if I sit here?" when there is a seat open next to a woman. If she says she minds, move on. Don't take it personally because it isn't about you. It's about her safety and her preference.
Second: I don't think women do men a kindness by saying that the bar is literally "be a decent human being". That might get a guy the first date or a conversation, but we all have compatibility personalities. I think a huge part of the problem of incel culture (which, let me be clear, is their problem and not women's!) is that it is self-fulfilling. Women saying to a specific man "hey, I don't think we're a good match" is fine but saying as a whole that all it takes is being "nice" is what gets incels into the whole "but I'm a nice guy™" narrative.
Yes, a guy needs to be a decent person. But the guy you want to date may need to have a beard or have a type B personality or be a good cook or use Arch Linux btw.
This. The number of women who have told me that they are friends with me or went out on a date with me because I was a decent human being surprises me.
I didn't read this as AI sentients but as AI killing the world through its irresponsible use of resources like water and electricity.
Basically, he's saying "I need to get as rich as possible so that I can have enough money to survive the water wars."
Capital One does something similar and it's so fucking annoying. They send text messages that read "Your transaction for some company was DECLINED! Take action now: http://someweirddomain.com/sketchy/uri"
I used URL Checker to figure out where it ultimately landed and it does go to Capital One.
I've even complained about this and they said, "Well, you should know these texts only come from us."
It's one thing to say "The Gaza Situation is crazy!"
It's another to say, "Palestine should be free!"
It's yet another to say "Zionism is killing people!"
It's a whole other thing to say "Israel is committing war crimes!"
Isn't Ubuntu available on the Microsoft store? I could have sworn it was
Corporations only have to be motivated by profit due to shareholders. There is no law requiring corporations to put profits first.
In the US, corporate structure provides legal protections to individuals. (Aside: I am convinced that these protections give corporations more rights than individuals but that's for another post.)