261

Here’s a ‘dead’ person on Social Security in Seattle, with plenty to say (www.seattletimes.com)

submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“You wake up one day and discover you’re dead,” Johnson told me. “It’s been truly surreal.”

That’s the biggest difference — my deceased guy turns out to be very much alive. Musk is contending that hordes of dead people are listed as alive in the Social Security databases, and are fraudulently still drawing benefits (which the Social Security director disputes).

Johnson is 82 and still kicking. Yet sometime last month, someone or something led Social Security to both tag him as dead and start clawing back his benefits.

Archived copies of the article:

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] dryfter@lemm.ee 90 points 1 year ago

I'm on disability and the last couple of weeks I've been thinking that I haven't been thinking rationally about this situation and that I'd be homeless if my SSDI suddenly disappeared or was clawed back. My therapist considers it catastrophizing.

Turns out my fears ARE rational, we're just living in a completely irrational timeline.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 42 points 1 year ago

Your therapist isn't paying attention. It's one thing to obsess over theoretical what-ifs. It's another to have evidence that a what-if is being directly threatened.

I'm still trying to get disability. I doubt there will be enough staff left to process claims in the very near future. Again, very real possibility.

Fingers crossed for both of us.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Right there with you, I have family to fall back on but I still have bills to pay

[-] dryfter@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I lost that option when I had to wait 2 years for my SSDI to be approved. 😣

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

This is just fuckin’ sad.

Conservatives get so up in arms about folks “taking advantage” of the system. When the reality is that there’s always going to be someone taking advantage of anything that can be taken advantage of. The percentage of the system being taken advantage of pales in comparison to those it truly helps. To cut off, or otherwise make difficult, the benefits to those that truly need it is horrendous, inhumane, cruel, and, to say the least, shortsighted.

To anyone in support of this and squaring it away with something like “it serves them right” - do something with that cold, dead brain of yours like thinking just a little bit.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

As always, it’s projection - anecdotally, the only people I have personally known to be abusing government programs have been conservative. That’s more of a quirk of “most people using government programs are poor and uneducated and therefore conservative”, but still.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

Everyone is abusing welfare, so I might as well do it too, after all, I paid into it!

Basically their thought process.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We call this rationalizing hypocrisy

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

And often it just costs more to get rid of the last freeloaders than accept there are a few in the grey area. You got to pay people to check and validate each claim for increasingly elaborate fraud and costs for that go to quickly, surpassing the savings you achieve.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Pareto principle for ya, eh? Diminishing returns be diminishing.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This has long been a litmus test for me of an individual's psyche or perspective - are you more concerned about the people freeloading, or about the people who need help and can't get it? Which is the bigger problem?

So many other opinions seem almost downstream of the answer to that question, in my experience.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Easy to say people are dead and collecting benefits when you are the one that marks them as dead when you know they're still alive and will continue to collect.

I don't believe for a second that people at DOGE didn't do this on purpose a few times to have examples to point to.

[-] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

The fact that there was a significantly large line and the agents overwhelmed tells you all you need to know about that.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025

261 points (99.6% liked)

News

38405 readers

1424 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world