If only it were possible to make points without inventing goofy and easily ridiculed scenarios.
Shiggles
joined 1 year ago
There are well defined lines at which supporting the government would not be supporting a stable democracy. Project 2025 has enumerated several of them.
I would certainly love to not see a single one of them come up. I plan to be disappointed.
They all get to share the blame. What are you even trying to say? “Damn guys, I voted for hitler but it’s okay he won by more than a single vote so I didn’t even matter”
The main difference between a prime minister and a president is the fact that they’re appointed, not elected, no? Little difference when you consider the state of national primaries in the states, but still.
Their face looks like “you know, I was going to murder you, but I’m just gonna see how long you keep this up for until you realize.
As much as I hate being a corporate shill: ask yourself this. Is the game worth the asking price with no DLC? You don’t have to buy every DLC, that’s just the cost of the additional game development time. And maybe the game isn’t worth the price now, but in two years you can probably pick it and a few of the best DLCs up for the same price as it is now and get your money’s worth.
To be fair, in that world body armor seems to be both commonplace and extremely effective.
I quantify it as: Taylor might not deserve the guillotine, the rest inarguably do.
Lemme know how that one turns out for ya bub
Hey man, fuck google, but this isn’t achieving diddly squat lmao.
How often does a solution need “new” code and not “basically the same code as a previous issue but with two small details changed”? This is a genuine question, I have only ever coded as a hobby. But 25% of your work being essentially just copy pasted sounds plausible, and that’s sorta all LLMs are doing, right?
view more: next ›
They hold some value when their vote is why we’re having to even entertain this as a possibility.