this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22336 readers
132 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to [email protected].

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].

[email protected] is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Parenti is cool but nowhere near the level of Stalin and Mao

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Swap Marx and Engels, because the meme would hit harder, but also the constitution of Stalin's formulations of Dialectical Materialism, as well as other philosophic formulations in Foundations of Leninism is adapted from Anti-Duhring, so arguably Engels is more prominent in ML canon than Marx, assuming the canon features Stalin more prominently than Marx, Engels or Lenin.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I just personally like Engels' writing style shrug-outta-hecks He's better than Marx at getting to the point of what he's trying to say

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Karl "this convoluted 19th century paragraph argument is going somewhere bro, trust me bro" Marx

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I also love reading Engels, and Anti-Duhring is every bit as important of a theoretical basis as a work like Capital. Capital achieves in practical analysis what Anti-Duhring achieves in theoretical analysis.

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 I think is Marx at his most digestible although he's much hazier on the mechanics of capitalist appropriation than in later works. Thesis on Feuerbach is a work of Marx's that is extremely concise and IMO understudied and poorly understood if not outright ignored. In a few hundred words Marx thoroughly obliterates any notion that he never considered "human nature" in his analysis, on the contrary his entire analysis begins with and stays permanently grounded in his deep love and optimism and hope for the spirit of humanity and our development; our immense potential for self actualization through revolutionary socialist cooperation.

There's just so much that can be learned from Marx specifically, and even if his later work is complicated, it can be understood best when you work with a group to understand it. It isn't something for the individual to master, it is for us all to free ourselves. But Engels in his own right, as difficult as it is to separate them, is a fantastic writer and theoretician.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why the hell is Combat Liberalism on the beginner list???? Sure, it's easy to read and a quick one at that, but it's not helpful in the slightest for understanding Marxism (or Leninism for that matter).

Also Jakarta Method as Advanced Theory is strange as hell, since it's like the most beginner friendly book on that entire list and requires almost no prior knowledge to understand.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yea, putting Combat Liberalism at the front implies a call to action before reading theory, aka it sets up the reader to go online and debate endlessly without knowing theory. It's silly, and is totally not exactly what I used to do before taking theory seriously hahahah of course not hahhaha kobeni-sweat

Truly all the theory teaching I do on my Lemmy.ml account is punishment for years of thinking I knew what Marxism was after reading the Manifesto and Socialism: Utopian and Scientific alone...

Same with Oppose Book Worship, like, at the beginning of a reading list and not at the end, a text focusing on touching grass and really working can be a double-edged sword. The central idea is to do both, read and practice, but with 2 summaries of summaries of the basics under your belt you aren't at risk of only reading yet, right? Just confusing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't know that sounds perfectly in line with the ideology of the online left blob-no-thoughts

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Truly the twelfth type of Liberalism, debating online without reading... So much wasted time... sadness

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They should make a website where they do exactly that. Let's call it something after a geometrical shape and an ursine creature. comfy

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Combat liberalism is just yourlogicalfallacyis.com for leftists.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh boy that's an inflammatory assertion right there, I love it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I asked Mao and he said I'm right and he's very disappointed in you all.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thank God I'm not a moaist or else I'd actually be upset.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's right! Aren't you the one who posted the legendary "I'm literally an anarcho-tankie" post on the subreddit way back when?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think so, my claim to fame on the old sub was a proposal so cringe I got roasted non-stop for a week straight. It was so bad i wish i was the poster that coined the "I'm literally an anarcho-tankie!"

I won't declare what kind of content I made that got me roasted because I'm burying that past name in an unmarked grave.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Oh, sorry! I don't think I ever knew of it whatever it was rat-salute-2

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Jakarta Method is such an easy read (well, ignoring the unpleasantness of the history it covers, anyway), wtf is it doing in advanced?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm reading Revolutionary Suicide right now and it's also a really easy read. It's basically Huey's autobiography and around 250 pages. The Conquest of Bread is more difficult because you have to look up a bunch of shit about the French Revolution and Franco-Prussian War to understand what Kropotkin is talking about.

With Revolutionary Suicide, you just have to be somewhat familiar with Civil Rights and who/what the Black Panther Party were. Maybe if you're not an American it's a struggle? IDK.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

It being included at all makes me pretty sure whoever made this list has not read these books themselves.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They probably are categorizing it more by what order they think people should read them and less how complicated they are, per se. The beginner category seems to have more rhetorical value getting people interested in MLism I guess?

Edit: Would put Capitalist Realism in the intro though if that's the case and the Stalin stuff after it. I don't know. I can almost tell this is made by a 20-something marxist-leninist who's probably excited to recommend what other people should read but aren't particularly well-read themselves.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The kind and humble Stalin would wedgie whoever made this and call them a personality cultists.

Stalin's own library of theoretical and ideological studies was broad and deep. He would not only study Marx, Engels, and Lenin, but would greatly study those who positioned themselves as ideological opposition to Marxism-Leninism. He actively read the writings of Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin, Plekhanov, etc. He made it a point to learn what and how his enemies think to better understand them and how to counter them. He did not simply hedge himself in a corner reading in an incestuous loop only books that served to reinforce his worldview. He went above and beyond what would be expected of an ideological leader and set the example for the rest of us disciples of Marx, Engels, and Lenin should follow.

That is to be well-read in both depth and breadth.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago

Not doing any reading until Hasan Piker releases a book azan

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific is a shocking omission. At least they didn't put the manifesto in there.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Granted I haven't read it, but I really don't think a Grover Furr book about the historical debate around the secret speech is intermediate.

I'm not sure I would include a work like that at all on a general reading list but at the very least it seems like something you'd get into on an advanced focus level.

I'm also not sure Mark Fisher actually needs to be there, but I see possible arguments at least.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Pat Sloans Soviet Democracy is advanced??? Very weird list

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Liberalism: A Counter history is honestly a pretty cruisy read, I recommend it to any budding hexbears. Much easier than Capital Vol. 1.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

it can be a bit dry but yeah nothing like Capital

Half the book is just a laundry list of venerated liberal thought leaders' horrific takes and actions, and much needed historical analysis dividing those genuinely radical elements of early liberal-aligned movements from the ideological liberals who just loved to rationalize slavery and any other form of oppression they found useful

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

a lot of Stalin though, kinda weird.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago

Yeah, clearly an ML wrote this list, but for some reason has a grudge against M and L.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago

The man did write some bangers

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

very weird to include so much by stalin but nothing by marx or big vlad. reddit and its consequences

Death to America

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

Why are a bunch of autobiographies in advanced? This borderline feels like some Trot troll came up with this list.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

Das Kapital is just revisionist garbage anyway.

[–] bdonvr 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is Marx highly outdated and been surpassed in some ways by newer works? Perhaps. But seeing the massive number of references to Marx just makes it seem like you'd be missing some foundational pieces if you skip it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

I wouldn't say Marx is outdated, his analysis and frameworks still hold up. He did not live to see the extent to which Capitalism would shift towards Imperialism, but Lenin and other Marxists consistently applied the frameworks laid out by Marx. I guess this is what you mean when you say you'd be missing foundational pieces by missing Marx, however, so I may be splitting hairs.

In my opinion, Marx is crucial for understanding the basics of political economy, Engels does a great job of simplifying dialectical materialism, Lenin forms the basis for understanding Imperialism, and Mao is the best source for practical applications of theory. Stalin's works are very easy to read and can be handy, but focusing on Stalin's works over Marx, Engels, Lenin, and even Mao feels... off. I would recommend reading all of the texts here eventually, but it doesn't make a concerted effort to teach the real aspects of Marxism in a practical manner, it reads more like a "best of" list than an actual training and learning regimen.

Just my 2 cents as someone with their own reading list.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Marx's work is not outdated, even if some of his earlier theories are less developed. But if you know who Grover Furr is then you know that this is not the kind of Marxism Leninism that has anything to do with Marx or Lenin.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I forget what drama was around the org, but I always thought this list was decent: https://www.mlreadinghub.org/study-materials/reading-list

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Thanks, comrade fidel-salute

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

I like the works, but it uses google analytics which I feel is antithetical to a Communist reading list (thanks for the plug @[email protected] ). I made my own personal list with an explicit intent on converting liberals and those sympathetic to ultras and trots towards a more grounded and practical approach, but I do like a lot of the works on that list and used to use it myself before the analytics thing was revealed to me.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

if you are critically online then reading lenin will give you an appreciation of what an absolute poster he was

dude would have slotted into twitter and reddit just fine and would so insufferable and based

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean at least it's not all Trot stuff. It's mostly good recs on there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

its mostly good recs

Grover Furr's proof that Trotsky was a Nazi collaborator: if there was evidence it would have been destroyed, no evidence exists therefore he was a Nazi collaborator

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

The only Marxism of value is the immortal science of u/smokeuptheweed9 -ism, to the dustbin of history with the rest

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago