this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

literature

1 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been re-reading Kafka’s The Metamorphosis and suspecting that Gregor Samsa did not actually turn into a beetle. I think it’s all in his head and that he’s just crazy and thinks he’s an insect. I think this because:

  • he gets transformed into a “vermin,” which could actually be a person;
  • Kafka’s father, with whom he had a Freudian relationship, frequently called people he disliked “vermin”;
  • Kafka said that the “vermin” should not be illustrated at all;
  • does Gregor’s family really act like they’re in the same house as a giant beetle or a crazy person?
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Just finished "The Devil's Chessboard." The book really goes out of its way to shower JFK with praise, but it's quite informative with regards to how the security apparatus took a central executive position in US government. I'm pretty convinced at this point that Kennedy was killed by an op spearheaded by Allen Dulles

Since finishing the book, I've started reading Marx's Capital. I didn't expect to read the phrase "One coat equals twenty yards of linen" over 50 times, but here we are. The book got much more engaging once it started laying out what "capital" is and how it differs from an equal exchange of commodities.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m reading Moby Dick (annotated Norman Critical Edition) and really liking it so far. The annotation helps quite a bit with understanding the historical and literary references.

Listening to The Jakarta Method thanks to a suggestion by a Hexbear user. Holy shit, I can’t believe how uninformed I was about Indonesia. Far more important for the US in the 1960s than Vietnam.

Trying to listen to Culture and Imperialism by Edward Said, but I’m finding myself bored in the first few chapters and might give up.

Theory list I am very gradually (over months) reading:

-Theories of Surplus Value

-Socialism, Utopian and Scientific

-Grundrisse

-Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction by Walter Benjamin

-Intellectual and Manual Labour by Alfred Sohn-Rethel

-For fun, a book from an art exhibition, called The Economy Is Spinning which takes influence from Sohn-Rethel among others

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Listening to The Jakarta Method thanks to a suggestion by a Hexbear user. Holy shit, I can’t believe how uninformed I was about Indonesia. Far more important for the US in the 1960s than Vietnam.

:suharto-die: emoji needed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Grimscribe, and My Work Is Not Yet Done by Thomas Ligotti. It's an interesting modern take on weird lovecraftian fiction.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Losurdo’s Liberalism: A Counter-History. It’s a banger. I’ve read excerpts of his before, and really liked them, but his books are wild. He quotes like a motherfucker, which is incredibly insightful, but takes a bit longer to read than other authors I’ve read. Literally 145 citations in the first 35 pages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Heard of it??!! The woman at the bookstore gave me a look and didn’t know what to say when she saw the title!
Lol in all seriousness I can’t wait until it comes in. It’s going to be so difficult finishing Liberalism once I’ve got the Stalin book. There’s a chapter from it that Roderic Day put up on RedSails, but that’s from the older unauthorized English translation. The chapter is about Krushchev’s Secret Speech; I’d recommend that if you can’t get your hands on a copy any time soon!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I've been waiting to do a deep dive on Losurdo when more of his stuff gets translated, I'm waiting for the Western Marxism one mostly. Out of the ones already translated, Liberalism: A Counter-History seems like the best.

On the Losurdo/Stalin ep of Guerrilla History with the translators they talk about how his approach to the Liberalism book is very similar to the Stalin book and that they're very good companion pieces.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I started listening to the Super Imperialism Audiobook on the youtube.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Drink every time he says “balance of payments.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, I'm dying of alcohol poisoning. Please help

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whoah, I heard it's basically a textbook - is listening working for you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm a little over an hour in so I can't really say if its a good format for it yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Four books I think of:

  • Primavera con una esquina rota by Mario Benedetti for some Spanish practice, takes place in the 70s and follows a few characters affected by the Uruguayan dictatorship
  • Capital vol 2, no further explanation needed, I haven't been reading as much of it as I should tbh, but I am continuing to slowly make my way through it
  • The Tondrakian Movement, by Vrej Nersessian, about a Christian sect largely based in the peasantry in 9th to 11th century Armenia that admittedly I first heard about in a CK2 mod lmao, but who were anti-feudal, pretty pro gender equality, etc.
  • I'm going to decline to name this one lol
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm going to decline to name this one lol

It's Gay Billionaire Dinosaurs in my Butt isn't it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

comments, mostly :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just finished David Graeber’s Utopia Of Rules and while it is only a collection of essays. Some of it comes across as extremely utopian. Ostensibly it’s about bureaucracies but it presupposes that bureaucratic processes are bad and inefficient. If you like Graeber (and I generally do) I wouldn’t recommend it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

that was both the first graeber i read and still a favorite. his critique of bureaucracy is definitely limited, but he also introduced me to a feminist critique of the monopoly on violence in the first essay, and his notion that the inefficiencies of capitalism greatly mitigate scientific progress is valid. (although the physicist he cites in this essay, jonathan katz, is an extreme racist and imperialist.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've been reading Mutiny: A History of Naval Insurrection by Leonard F. Guttridge. It's funny cuz he's a labor historian and his sympathies are clearly with the sailors in most cases, but it's published by a naval press and the intended audience is clearly officers. Also there's a chapter on the Kronstadt sailors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm reading 4 books rn.

Blood in my Eye by George Jackson (1971) is a blassic, and a total banger. Prison Essays by Black Guerrilla Family founder. He's thinking very deeply about the solutions to many problems we still face today, in some ways it's tragic that this book is still so relevant. Poetic, fiery, contemplative. Here's a bit of text I came across yesterday:

  • Prisons were not institutionalized on such a massive scale by the people. Most people realize that crime is simple a result of gross disproportionate distribution of wealth and privilege, a reflection of the present state of property relations. There are no wealthy men on death row, and so few in the general prison population that we can discount them altogether. Imprisonment is an aspect of class struggle from the outlet.

Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson (2020) is solid so far. I don't read scifi much because I often find the writing is weak, but this is pretty well-written. The first chapter is a banger standalone short story about a multi-day wetbulb in Mumbai - legitimate climate horror. The rest is about the downstream responses from different types of groups, from lib technocrats to radicals and revolutionaries. I like the approach that all the chapters have different styles, like one might be a poem, one might be a description of the biggest oil extraction corporations on Earth, another might just be a diary entry of an unnamed character we never met again. Apparently he a (democratic) socialist, which is cool.

The Progress of This Storm by Andreas Malm (2017) is an interesting project. It's an effort to take newer philosophical trends in critical theory (in opposition to dialectical materialism) and submits them to an analysis about whether they are clarifying or mystifying, activating or pacifying with respect to the climate crisis. If you're going to read some Malm I'd say this is probably his least urgent text, but he is often at his most fun when he starts swinging around his baseball bat wrecking shit, and there's a lot of that in here even though sometimes I wonder if he's strawmanning some of the philosophies he trashes.

  • We should conclude...that building a new coal-fired power plant, or continuing to operate an old one, or drilling for oil, or expanding an airport, or planning for a highway is now irrational violence.

Climate Change as Class War by Matthew Huber (2022) - good title, but there's a lot of nonsense in this book.

I also just read Gabriel Rockhill's new essay in June's edition of Monthly Review: The Myth of 1968 Thought and the French Intelligensia: Historical Commodity Fetishism and Ideological Rollback. I think this guy has an interesting project and am looking forward to all of this being collected in his book so I can read it in one coherent thread. His basic push is to, bit by bit, examine all the theorists that are held up as "radical postwar thinkers" in the West and just feed them through the simple rubric of asking what actual socialist or anticolonial movements did they actually support, if any? His broader theory is that these not radical "radical theorists" play a functional role in capitalist hegemony to appeal to people open to considering an alternative to this system and redirecting them away from the actually effective project of scientific socialism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Interested in hearing your thoughts when you finish MFTF. The first chapter is definitely the best part of the book, but I was fascinated by a lot of the other ideas KSR came up with. I read somewhere that it's his best case scenario outlook for our climate future, which is both bleak and yet still much more hopeful than I personally think it will be. Would also love it if airships made a comeback.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The Complete Annotated Book of Rules for Parking Validation. Enjoying it a whole lot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I finished Settlers and started The Foucault Reader, edited by Paul Rabinow. Even though he's Fr*nch, I wanted to take a look at post-structuralism and I like materialist philosophers so this seems like a good fit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Also still a lot of gay webcomics and mangas

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

How is Settlers to read?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Recently finished The Iron Heel by Jack London. It's fascinating to read a 100+ year old fiction novel and still feel like its relevant and even predictive. But then you realize class struggle has been going on for a long time and the critiques from last century still apply today, there's just different technology. Worth the read even if its more dialogue than plot.

Also read Che, My Brother which is a fascinating insight into how Che became a Cuban revolutionary and his legacy after his death told by his brother, Juan Martin. I learned a lot of little details about his life growing up in Argentina, his eccentric parents, and how Che was able to inspire even his own family to join the fight. Great book.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Information Technology and Socialist Construction by Daniel Saros

Good so far, but I just started. Saw it recommended by Morozov

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sounds dope just from the title

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does, but I've been let down by similar books in the past. The recommendation by Morozov is making me want to finish it. Its on libgen if anyone wants it, the print copy is like $500 or some bullshit. Fuck Routledge.

So far it seems to tacitly be taking the position that socialism was impossible in the USSR, China, etc., because they had not yet fully developed capitalism (and the developed world did not experience the necessary revolutions to assist them in industrialization, etc). Which, I am a bit ambivalent about. Part of me is going "yes, yes, capital must first be sufficiently developed in order for it to be abolished", and the other part is rolling their eyes a bit.

That said, the first section has done a decent job of laying out the Marxist conception of capital, surplus value, historical development, and the various debates around these issues. The text is much less anti-marxist-brainwormed than something from the Parecon guys like Hahnel though, Saros is a marxist at the very least.

So I'm still unsure what I will think about it overall. Maybe he is a bit of a leftcom? idk yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

socialism was impossible in the USSR, China, etc., because they had not yet fully developed capitalism (and the developed world did not experience the necessary revolutions to assist them in industrialization, etc).

That's a Trot line isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Could be. I'm not very familiar with the trot line tbh. Not a single mention of trotsky yet though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't been reading much. Just started Walter Rodney's How Europe Underdeveloped Africa because of the Niger situation. Already Rodney goes incredibly hard:

But, contrary to the fashion in most prefaces, I will not add that “all mistakes and shortcomings are entirely my responsibility.” That is sheer bourgeois subjectivism. Responsibility in matters of these sorts is always collective, especially with regard to the remedying of shortcomings. The purpose has been to try and reach Africans who wish to explore further the nature of their exploitation, rather than to satisfy the “standards” set by our oppressors and their spokesmen in the academic world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is a cool book. It gets a little dry any into the weeds sometimes about very specific regions but will then out of nowhere start going hella hard again. I think there's a chapter early on that's very long and talks about the different regions of Africa and their history - I recommend pushing through as it's worth it in the end. I want to read his other books now too, and have one on the bookshelf for later in the month.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm currently trying to comprehend bits and pieces from Anti-Duhring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm finally getting around to Earthsea. Reading Le Guin is just always a pleasure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A copy of Please Kill Me that was annotated by hand by a former lover. It's been a ride of higher highs and lower lows.

Edit: Oh I also picked up a copy of Mage: The Awakening, 2nd edition because of my theory that World of Darkness doesn't actually work together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

theory that World of Darkness doesn't actually work together

What do you mean by this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The way I was lead to understand things was that the World of Darkness games could intermingle. Like you could have a Mage show up in a Vampire adventure and vice versa, because they're all built on the Storyteller system. But when I tried to do it ages ago, I couldn't figure out how those characters were supposed to interact on a mechanical level. From what I can tell, these games just don't really map onto each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, so I think in world of darkness (sometimes called classic world or old world of darkness these days) the games were less mechanically compatible.

Mage the Awakening is part of the chronicles of darkness line (originally also just called world of darkness when they thought the old world of darkness stuff was going to be fully retired), and is close to mechanically identical to other games in that line (other than the supernatural powers work very differently).

I do think mixing character types in chronicles of darkness games is still a little rough though as the themes are very different (vampire is about trying to maintain your humanity and navigating a political power structure, werewolf is about hunting monsters and balancing your human and spirit sides, mage is about dealing with academic politics and being literally addicted to learning about matic, etc) and so having a werewolf in a vampire game is almost like having a D&D adventurer in a vampire game, even if adjudicating mechanical interactions isn't too bad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Posthumous Memoirs of Bras Cuba's, a Brazilian masterpiece apparently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you think so far? Read it a while back and had such a fun time. Felt surprisingly modern (almost postmodern) for something written in the 19th century.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just started it yesterday and am digging it so far. A coworker recommended it to me because I was talking about how much I liked Tristam Shandy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now that's a book I've had lying on my shelf for ages! I was actually told to read it because I loved Bras Cubas. Guess they're a good pair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's a banger

load more comments
view more: next ›