i think this is inscrutable precisely because it is unserious. the western chauvinist does not need to be serious. there is no wrong way to defend it, much like sartre's antisemite.
the one where he has to understand that race is political but doesn't have to understand that gender is
because of course it would be two giga-Zionazi demoncrats. gottheimer, who loves genocide, and CIA slotkin herself. of course they would want to do this.
yeah they're actually in their own replies going "no no no your argument is terrible, just be racist, that will actually persuade me. c'mon."
i think this so beautifully demonstrates the consensus of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. it ramps up its increases in the second obummer term, continues apace through trump, and then only levels out after getting significantly heightened.
which is to say, he fundamentally is using the word ethnostate in an inappropriate and incorrect way that indeed muddies and excuses the general formation of an ethnostate such as the zionist entity.
paper mario if you will
this one to me is so specific about certain points relative to his recent coherency that i feel like steven miller might have written it.
this is probably as close to we're going to get to a literal recreation of the burning of the berlin clinic
since it's 2025 and not 1925.
Dana must literally think that she can fix him

not to be confused with jared moskowitz, who is demonic in almost identical ways. i think he's a sponsor on one of the corpo sponsored anti-privacy bills. i say this because i totally confuse where gottheimer and moskowitz are based out of sometimes.