top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 257 points 2 years ago (29 children)

I mean, this is how far our standard of living has fallen in the US.

Like, back in the 80's and 90's it was pretty normal for a family to subsist on a single income, in a reasonably nice house, with all of their necessities taken care of. It was so normal that even a brainless loser like Homer could do it.

Also because back then, kinda fat = automatic loser

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To be fair a nuclear operator can typically afford to support a family of 5 even today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago*

    This. The show routinely makes fun of the fact that Homer is completely unqualified for his job and seems to keep it because he amuses Burns. They had a whole episode recently about how Homer got a new job over a nuclear engineering PhD because he Cyrano'd the interview via Fink. Meaning his job title likely commands well over $200k, though it is implied that Burns pays him somewhat less than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    That said, suburbia was built on borrowed money from the future , and the reason why most cities are broke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    It has nothing to do with suburbia.

    It has everything to do with the politics of Thatcher and Reagan. Their policies of annihilating unions, human rights and creating tax cuts for the rich by passing on the taxes to the working and the poor created this dystopian reality we now have.

    If we cut out the rich and restore what we used to have for rights and protections, we can try to save ourselves from extinction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago*

    My point is, for a city, every square foot of street has an operational cost, and on top of that infrastructure needs to be rebuilt every x years (I think around 20 ~ 25).
    While the upfront cost of said infrastructure tends to come from subventions when building a new development, the city needs to cover the costs for both operations and rebuilding once it's needed.

    Why does this matter? Well, detached single-family houses provide lower revenue per square foot of street than middle housing or mid-rises, eventually creating a hole in the city's pockets.

    I'm not explaining it very well, but I'll suggest taking a look at this:
    https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2023/6/21/whats-the-sweet-spot-for-building-housing-inexpensively
    Climate Town - The suburbs are bleeding America Dry

    If cities had money, they could build public housing or promote affordable options.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Like, back in the 80’s and 90’s it was pretty normal for a family to subsist on a single income, in a reasonably nice house, with all of their necessities taken care of.

    I wonder what "pretty normal" is, according to actual numbers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    I remember growing up in the 90's, my classmates and I all thought that one of the other kids was a liar because he said he didn't have a yard (he lived in an apartment). It didn't make sense - everyone else in the class of 30+ kids lived in a house with a yard, so he must just be making stuff up. Obviously that's anecdotal evidence, but still. It was weird for a kid not to live in a single-family home back then.

  • source
  • parent
  • You'd have to look at the size of the middle class back then, as that's what the "American Dream" scenario is based on there, but as a kid born in 1990, I can say that when my dad was looking for apartments when he was around college age in the 60s, the rule was not to rent an apartment that cost more than 25% of your salary. By the time I was around that same age in the late 2000s/early 2010s, it was 50% of your salary. Now, it's closer to 120% of your salary for those same apartments.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 206 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    He's not? There's literally an episode about how Homer is so lucky in life that he drives a man insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    In fairness, that entire episode was lampshade hanging

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 91 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Uhhhh... Homer has three kids, surely?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 78 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Wait, 2 kids? Which one died?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    My dudes.... He has three kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 64 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    OP lives above a bowling alley and bellow another bowling alley.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Because he's a little overweight, and in 1989, that was reason enough to laugh at someone.

    Plus, all of those were commonplace thirty years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I see your Homer Simpson and raise you Al Bundy, who works at a shoe store and raised a family of 4 on that salary

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I live in a single room above a bowling alley and below another bowling alley

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Isn't Homer meant to be an illustration of privilege? Like, he's pretty useless, but still gets essentially everything he wants.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You missed how he is dumb as fuck and how all he have is by luck . As another person commented there is an episode in which a real hard working man gets mad how homer has everything even tho he does'nt deserve it and i agree he almost causes nuclear melt down atleast twice a day, abuses his son, ignores his daughter etc.etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    Frank Grimes: If you lived in any other country in the world, you'd have starved to death long ago.

    Bart: He's got you there, Dad.

    Grimes: You're a fraud, a total fraud. (To Marge and the kids) Was nice meeting you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    He is not, see the Frank Grimes episode

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    WELL, I DON'T NEED SAFETY GLOVES, BECAUSE I'M HOMER SIMP--

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I'm fifty one years old and just kinda wanna break down what I've seen in my life:

    My grandparents generation: Was able to buy housing, get healthcare, receive retirement. Note: They lived through the great depression, and categorically never spent any money that wasn't necessary, even when they had several boatloads of it.

    My parents generation: Housing was achievable but not given (I remember a whole lot of single wides, apartments, and duplexes among the adults of my childhood). Healthcare was affordable. Retirement was promised but not delivered.

    My generation: Housing was achievable if you moved to the sticks and loved you some Jesus at the local Baptist Church, but not in the cities. We got a taste of healthcare twenty five years ago, but then yeah no. Retirement? Hahahahaha! We got 401(k)s forced in us, and they never materialized into dick. Many flatout vaporized when our marriages fizzled out.

    My kid's generation. Seriously, just die in the street. You'll get absolute fuck all nothing, and you'll like it as the older generations blame you for our fuckups.

    My great contribution is that I'll be able to leave my house free and clear of mortgage to my spawn when I check out. She can live in it, sell it, rent it, burn it to the ground. Whatever she wants, but damnit, I'm giving her the opportunity to do it, which most of her peers will never have.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Hedonism and Wealth should not be your metric for evaluating people, anon.

    Homer sleeps at his job, is a habitual drinker, and is willfully ignorant.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›