this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
245 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13509 readers
1527 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There are two types of videos. 3 minute ticktoks and 2 hour video essays about "Hegelian philosophy hidden in the Adventures of the Gummi Bears"
Bouncing here and zhere, schniff, and everywhere, and scho on.
There are also 10-hour "analysis" videos of video games that are inexplicably just narrating a playthrough with almost no actual analysis present.
The first channel that comes to mind is Joseph Anderson. I have no idea how his videos became so popular when his "critiques" are just reciting the plot of games.
He's got some good videos, but I agree that the Witcher stuff (the bulk of his output for the last three years) is definitely like a shitty abridged LP
Actually the bulk of his output for the last three years has been weeb streams.
There's a few of these that immediately come to mind, like the Oblivion one that was 12 hours long or something.
I think it would be much better if the first section of the analysis was a brief rundown of the game and its content, and then the rest of the video was devoted to certain themes, where those themes take place (by bringing up some parts of the content in more detail) and how those themes are used by the game developers intentionally or unintentionally, but that's considerably more work than just narrating over a Let's Play and saying "This is good" or "This sucks"