443
Anon is incompatible
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
443 points (96.0% liked)
Greentext
8301 readers
1730 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm proud to be incompatible with Apple
Why?
My Mac studio m2 was the only computer I ever had that had compatibility issues with some USB cables
People talk about Apple hardware like it's incredible, but honestly, no pc manufacturer would make that mistake
I'd like to hear more about this. I have a theory that as great as USB-C is for consistency, the fact that it shares a connector with Thunderbolt (to say nothing about the different versions of Thunderbolt) introduces a level of uncertainly when looking at a USB-C connector.
I'm certainly not trying to discount your experience. I'm sure you ran into significant problems. But in general I continue to believe that the general public may not have the right "flavor" of USB-C cable to do what they are trying to do in a given situation.
It's nothing to do with the standard I believe
The same cables and adapters all worked when I used them on my nuc for the same devices, and they wouldn't even work with my mouse on the Mac studio.
My suspicion is that the shell of the case is a bit thick (as the port is recessed behind it), so some cables just failed to touch fully. As, some cables felt more snug and clicked into the port better
For the cost of the computer, it damned sure shouldn't have that issue
Even worse, for the price of the computer, the power button should be on front, not buried on the back. That's overcomplicating things for the sake of doing so
What's rather ironic is my Linux FOSS setup is more compatible than ever because it can open my students .notes and .pages files, while MS Word couldn't.
And naturally, I'm proud of using FOSS so I guess I'm proud to be compatible with everything.
What are you using for .pages? I have .docx covered but have a backlog I planned to convert someday.
Skill issue. I have LocalSend on all my devices.
Reportedly Quickshare is now compatible with airdrop. I'm 0 for 1 right now. Could have been a skill issue. I was using hotspot at the time, which apparently interferes.
I believe it only works for a small subset of Pixel devices. At least for now.
works for Samsung Galaxy devices too
I'm with you. People like this are why nobody likes Linux users.
Skill my foot. If any of my technology is compatible with Apple tech, I'll intentionally break it until it isn't.
So you complain about the walled garden but the wall is actually a moat you dug yourself?
At this point I’m just amazed.
Read the original post again
TBH, IDK what you mean.
apple is still better than google tbh
i use grapheneOS but its just the truth
I dunno, isn't it kinda pointless to compare a stroke with brain cancer? Sure, you can have preferences, but they're both horrible.
yes, very true, and well put
wHaTaBoUt
what kind of phone do you have
Xiaomi 😎
how do you like it?
Has more bloatware than samsung and more spyware than facebook. Not the person you talked with first, but I also have a xiaomi and it's borderline unusable if you don't use adb to uninstall some of the ad shit. They throw ads on gallery, video player, music player, wallpaper, calculator, file browse.
Did you get one of the really cheap ones? I have heard they are cheap for a reason (e.g. they get the money from elsewhere, AKA selling you).
I wish that was a problem exclusive to the cheaper phones or even xiaomi. I've had a Samsung Galaxy S20, it came with so much fucking bullshit apps. My gf and her sister both have a mid-high xiaomi (dunno about the specific model), ads are every-fucking-where.
sounds pretty bad, is it compatible with android apps?
it's android, so it's fully compatible
ah i see, does it not integrate with google play services by default or something?
It does, the international version comes with google play and the store and everything, it's a typical android phone like what you get from motorola or samsung, with a custom UI and lots of bloatware
oh, okay, thanks - wonder why that other guy acted like it was some kind of gotcha when he replied
Probably a "Notes" xiaomi (or cheaper even), cheap and with publicity. I have the "flagship killer" (whatever that means) and there is 1 publicity in the file manager. I use FX so I don't care personally.
If you tinker a minimum (like installing an app) it's extremely well worth the money compared to samsung or worse, apple. IMO.
i dont think we are talking about like, phone performance so much as the level of evil associated with the corporation provided by the platform, i use grapheneOS which is degoogled android because google is super evil, and apple is evil too, but they're a minor evil by comparison to google
Don't you have to buy a phone from google to use graphene though?
you need a pixel for the time being, but that'll be changing soon. i got a second hand pixel that was two versions older than the latest to mitigate that as much as possible
Octo core, 8GB ram (+8GB "virtual" whatever that means), 1TB storage, Leica optics and a mind blowing 120watt charger (that I rarely use, but when I do... Hold your hat!).
It's just a very good phone IMO, no bling, but also no specific downside. Maybe the one thing is a not vert good file manager, but I use FX so I don't really relate.
the other xiaomi user pointed out that its basically just android, with google play services and all, so you're just any other android user pretty much, right?
Correct.
Would love to have a bare Linux on it for sure though. I'd use it as my main PC lol.
yeah, the reason i compared google and apple is because it's like the only two options available, as far as i know there aren't any linux phones which can actually work as phones, best we can do is degoogled android and very few people use it
Friend had the fairphone, without google (apparently you can choose with or without and she went full in), seemed to work okay with some small hiccups from time to time but nothing special.
Nah. Ad blocking is shit. There's no revanced or morphe or whatnot. Many things are better, but too many things are worse.
that isn't true, i used to use iphone and it had uYou+extras which is basically a modified youtube app with sponsorblock and adblock, and there are other things which are similar, and adguard is also pretty solid
Google automatically screens and blocks spam calls. That alone is enough for me to put it above Apple.
iOS does this too
"yes all of my personal data is being used by an evil wizard plotting world domination but he has some convenient spells that the bog witch simply does not offer"
pure copium
why would it be copium when i dont even use apple bruh