Serinus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

So you've... compromised your own security. Grats?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago

And, if it's a big enough portion of the charity's funding, influence over the charity. But not tax breaks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure a certain narrative will be curated here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It seems like his concern is something he doesn't want to be clear about.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

People do not want to hear, ‘Well, actually the economy is good.’”

In four years these same people are going to line hearing that, regardless of reality.

It's not about the message. It's about the color of the team saying it. Red, orange, and white over blue, brown, and white.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Picture looks adversarial af. Caption: They're all friends.

Yeah, okay.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Just as likely he's now sending a pittance to other people in order to say he wasn't targeting a group. You can send out a LOT of hundred dollar bills before you approach a billion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

What was the "gut" thing again?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's another one not marked that's been up for hours. "Tulsi Gabbard to be Director of National Security." Yeah, okay. Funny joke.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago (5 children)

For the uninformed, this is funny (and sarcasm) because there's mountains of evidence of them together. Besides, you know, picking him for AG. But he tries this defense all the time anyway, and people actually believe it.

Just like explicitly Trump calling up members of Congress to kill the bipartisan border bill, and then blaming the Democrats for not passing a border bill. They sold that one on the campaign trail too, and it worked.

Sources

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No. This isn't a thing you need to "both sides". There is nuance.

It's bad for Netanyahu if settlers die. It's good for him if Israeli people are threatened. His appeal is that he'll protect them (including through killing others). If he fails to do that too often, he loses.

Hamas is fine with people on their side dying. Israel is not. Israel is accomplishing their goals through genocide. Palestinians would love to genocide Israel, but they can't. That doesn't excuse Israel actually currently committing genocide.

And there's no excuse for settling land in areas that will keep Israelis in danger. The first settlers are Zionists, later people living there won't (necessarily) be Zionists.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They don't like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.

That's all I've got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it's pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It's insane that companies haven't jumped on it.

You don't even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.

 

The new spec ... allows manufacturers to connect devices directly to the internet.

Enshittification comes for all.

view more: next ›