this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
157 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13603 readers
687 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cw: discussion of common cw tags and subjects, including violence, sexual violence, animal products, and others.

Bluesky's trust and safety (betrayal and bullshit) team is engaged in high fuckery and we're likely going to get some new folks coming in from bksy.

Now's probably a good time to revisit content warnings and when and how to use them.

Content warnings are just that; a warning about the content of a post or submission. They grew out of the older notion of "trigger warnings" as an acknowledgement that no one could reasonably guess what might be triggering to other people. Instead content warnings are a more general heads up that a discussion contains material that may be upsetting or unwanted by some people.

It's a friendly warning so folks can decide whether or not they'd like to engage with the discussion.

Note on "nsfw". When assessing if something is not safe for work ask yourself if a corporate HR rep who hated you would use it as evidence to get you fired.

Animal products - posts discussion animal products like meat or leather should have cw: animal products or cw: meat in the post title or header. Posts should usually be labelled nsfw and it's courteous to put discussions inside a spoiler tag so people can choose if they want to open it or not.

Sexual violence or sexual assault - posts discussion sexual violence, sexual assault, intimate partner violencen, or sexual violence against kids, all need to be labelled with a cw. Sv is commomly used for sexual violence, sa for sexual assault, csa or csam for violence against children. Posts should always have a nsfw tag or be placed in a spoiler tag.

Violence - posts discussing violence, torture, and related topics should have a cw as such and use spoiler tags and nsfw tags as appropriate.

Graphic images - graphic images of violence, combat footage, severe injusry or death, should be labelled as such and should always have an appropriate cw and be placed in spoiler tags and marked with the nsfw.

Bigotry - sexism, racism, tranphobia, misogyny, ethnic bigotry, ableism, and really any structural violence generally merits a cw. If it's graphic or upsetting putting the material in a spoiler tag is polite.

Some other things that may merit a cw

  • common phobias liek spiders and clowns

  • particularly awful politics

  • notorious or hated political figures

  • Hexbear pop culture enemies - for instance superhero movies are often semi-seriously marked with a "capeshit" warning

  • topics discussing religious trauma

  • sexual topics and general horniness as a courtesy to our ace and otherwise not-interested comrades

  • medical trauma and topics that are frequent sites of medical violence.

If there was a "rule" it'd be; if you think someoen might find your post upsetting it's usually wroth writing a one or two word cw and sticking it at the top of the post. It's a courteous way to give people a heads up on what the discussion is about so if it's content they don't want to engage with they can skip it and keep browsing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

ngl, kinda weird to see the newbies with their actual faces for their pfp. I'm not sure if we ever had an explicit rule against that, but it's something that I've noticed.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Twitter and its descendants are much more about building a personal brand. This place is more like the old internet where no one felt comfortable doxing themselves. Hopefully, our ways rub off on the newbies a bit. Opsec is going to be especially important in the coming fash wave.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I kinda think it should be an explicit rule against having your actual face, but that's just me.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What if you use your actual face, but you're famous, so no one would think it's actually Jerma?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know you're not actually Jerma because I'm actually Jerma

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

mom said its my turn to actually be jeram

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if we had a Jerma week where everyone's pfp got changed to a different random image of Jerma?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Dibs on JermaThing

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I was just posting about this in the mega but I didn't want to say it to every new person and scare them unnecessarily. As an explicitly leftist site, we're a bigger target for harassment from external right-wingers and so being able to link you on Hexbear to you on Bluesky and Twitter, or especially to real life, is probably not good. Let alone the amount of ironic memes that would probably look bad out of context to the average person.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I think that's a great idea. I don't particularly like the idea of the culture here becoming more like twitter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I posted my face but I was in full halloween makeup

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have posted a few pics of myself but that is only cuz all the cops/fash in my area already know who I am.

If you aren't a known entity already I get the anonymity but at the same time if you aren't going that hard IRL then how can you even call yourself a revolutionary?