It's because you weren't there, dawg, everybody else came to the meeting and we were waiting and waiting but you never showed up

fuck how do I not have brain tumor yet

But seriously this will suck for people living in Syria. But hey good thing we got rid of Assad amirite?

https://www.hudsonbaycapital.com/documents/FG/hudsonbay/research/638199_A_Users_Guide_to_Restructuring_the_Global_Trading_System.pdf

it's linked here. feels like Bush/Project for a New American Century.

his treasury secretary wrote this back in October too: https://archive.ph/IYXLe

seems like: crash the market, negotiate individually, new trade deals guaranteeing permanent/ongoing softening of the US Dollar.

i also appreciate all the user's providing analysis of what's going on other than "trump bad" or "trump insane." other than this site, the internet has mostly been a useless pile of shit this past week.

NEW YORK—Stressing that the memory seemed so fresh and vivid in their minds, the confused nation announced Monday that they could have sworn British entertainer Russell Brand was already a convicted sex offender. “Interesting…so Russell Brand definitely wasn’t already found guilty of sexual assault back in, like…2016, 2017?” said 39-year-old New York resident Scott Hasard, echoing the thoughts of 330 million Americans as he noted that when he saw allegations emerge about the actor, comedian, and podcast host, he had assumed it was simply repackaged content from nearly a decade ago. “You’re telling me there wasn’t a lengthy and well-publicized trial where Brand was acquitted, but then new allegations emerged? And, like, social media posts where the women got called liars? None of that happened? Huh. I even feel like I read a think-piece about how we could still appreciate Forgetting Sarah Marshall despite his crimes. It’s probably insane to even ask this, but didn’t he release a comeback special back in 2020 about how everyone tried to cancel him for the sexual assault stuff? Seriously? Not even that?” At press time, the baffled nation asked what had made Brand into such an unhinged and deeply frustrated person if all of this hadn’t kicked it off years ago.

Common non-coffee drinker W

It's beautiful

This is a real big update to my simulation and reworks the entire logic of it. Though doing so allows me to investigate even more stuff. Check out the post on the old sim if you haven't seen it.

At this point, the sim has become so complex, I don't think I can explain it in as much depth as the previous one.

So I'll keep it simple and show you my assumptions, results, and code. There are 10 sectors in the economy this time (so the visualization has changed)

As always, "economic reproduction" is the condition where nobody in the economy gains or looses money by the end of the production period.

The code and pictures are in the comments.

Also, I'd like /u/Sebrof and /u/[email protected] to see this post.

Assumptions:

1. There are no banks, governments, population growth or technological changes. None of these things are modeled yet since they distract from the point of the model, which is to see how labor prices and economic reproduction are related.

My next model will try to model these things to see if the relationship between labor prices and economic reproduction still holds

2. The logic of this model is inverted to the last one. In the previous model, we started with a net output (sold to consumers) then calculated how much gross output would be needed (sold to consumers and to factories) to maintain this. This time, I randomly generate a gross output then compute a net output.

3. I randomly generate 100,000 economies, each with its own technological level (the 10x10 A matrix), a set of prices (10x1 column vector), and employment in industries (10x1 vector). I assume everyone is employed. Also, this time, there is only 1 price vector per economy.

4. For each economy, I randomly generate a "basket of consumption", which is the amount of products that its people will consume. I scale the basket so that it could be produced by half the labor of the economy, and keep the basket constant for all time.

5. This time, there is foreign trade. If the economy produces more of a product than what is required for the basket, that's exports. Otherwise it imports.

6. I simulate 100 time steps for each economy. Every time step, the sectors of the economy will update their prices and employment. There were many possible rules for choosing how these updates happened. I made it so that the sectors hire workers in proportion to how much money they have (divided by how much it costs to hire workers). Prices are scaled down as a sector grows (due to competition)

7. Then I compute all the financial data (like revenues, wages, incomes, costs, trade imbalances, profits, etc) and plot it.

The important accounting identities are:

National income = Wages + trade balance

National income = Revenues of industry - Costs of industry (not including wages)

I'm in a restaurant, just got off work, trying to eat my "end of work week breakfast". Meanwhile some old fucks are talking shit about poor people and people on welfare half way across the room, and good fucking lord it's pissing me off.

Good god I have to deal with co-workers shitting where they eat, why can't I get some fucking reprieve away from work...

Strip away their branding.

is running a government austerity program.

Capitalism is great.

And I’m not talking about the ones in power, more the rank and file.

I speculated this wrecking ball approach to the US economy was an attempt to destabilize the world and marshall the forces of violent fascism, and make the battle for hegemony one of attrition since the Us no longer sees itself capable of competing with China’s manufacturing capabilities.

So, like, what does the average Joe think? That while everything around him comes crumbling down, all the trans and blacks will at least be put in their place?

I’m wondering if the debate around the seemingly confusing motivations are due to…too much of a materialist approach? I think it’s either that or absolutism when it comes to the dialectic and taking these thoughts to their logical conclusions

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202504/04/WS67ef1f4ea3104d9fd381d96e.html