What is even the point of having a picture of text without a link? The screenshot is supposed to be a preview of the content that you linked. Here's the text from the image of text. Okay where did that image come from? If you see an image of a text without credits to an official source, you should instinctively disbelieve the text.

https://nitter.net/DD_Geopolitics/status/1720618902416171413#m

The tweet is from 2023. The text of the tweet is in reference to Biden deploying USS Eisenhower and USS Ford in October 2023 to enable Israel to do genocide in Gaza.

I'm skeptical of the DD_geopolitics account. Sometimes they post correct info and sometimes they exaggerate. DD stands for "Donbass Devushka" an alias of Sarah Bils. There are some suspicions that Sarah Bils is working for the Russian government. I don't know the full details, good for her.

The other person who operates the account is Christopher Helali. Christopher Helali is another really eccentric individual. He's a member of the ACP, ie patsoc/nazbol. He was the 3rd in the party leadership, he might have stepped down. He also claims to own one of Epstein's address books and said he bought it on ebay. I also have the suspicion that Chris Helali is a fed because of the ACP stuff and a lot of other weird things.

I'm not complaining about them being pro-Russia. I am under the impression that they are both patsoc/nazbol types. Some of their tweets promote patsoc/ACP type things.

I can't find the text posted by a different source.

There is no definitive set of rules for "privacy".

You have to know what you are trying to hide and who you are trying to hide it from.

You cannot hide that you are a communist/socialist/leftist/whatever. Hiding your affiliation to these is antithetical to the goals. You have to get together (in real life, not on the internet) with other like-minded people to accomplish the goals of these causes.

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is the best source of privacy information that I've known. The organization has lawyers that sometimes provide pro-bono legal representation in cases related to internet stuff. They have lots of educational material and guides on the website.

Go to the link at the bottom, scroll to the bottom of the page. There are buttons that says like "I am a (abortion patient | protestor | academic | journalist | lgbt youth)". Click whichever button is most relevant to you and it will give you a list of privacy suggestions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation

https://ssd.eff.org/

20 minutes til launch and the queue isn't up yet. The servers are probably going to be fucked on launch.

I'm torn between playing the new luminary ascendancy and strength stacker jugg. I had to read through all the new vestigial uniques.

this is the vestigial mods from the pastebin formatted into a spreadsheet. found on reddit.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KaL3kNhjIMfiEI9OTlyu5P83OSOIhwjl/htmlview?gid=1313965077&pru=AAABn7jjR-M*ltxZM1p8DXq4ZOB9iT2cVA#gid=1313965077

This is an absurd accusation. Iran has been incredibly restrained when interacting with the US and Israel. When Trump pulled out of the JCPOA in 2018, Iran continued to follow the JCPOA.

All of Iran's attacks have on US bases have been proportional to the US attacks. The media exaggerates and says that Iran has attacked many countries, but it only attacks the US bases in those countries, bases which attacked Iran first.

Honestly I think Iran has been too restrained with the US. I think Iran should stop giving so much leniency to US fuckery.

Iran doesn't want to have nukes because of religious reasons. Iran should have nukes because it is the only form of deterrence that the Imperialist forces understand.

The US murdered 160 Iranian school girls on the very first day of the 2026 US war against Iran. Not accidentally. Intentionally. The US bombed the same school again shortly later to kill the rescuers.

here's the Rubio video clip https://nitter.net/atrupar/status/2079910052144554479

This meme is so true because US didn't read the MoU that Trump signed. Point 5 says that Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz.

Yesterday, a reporter asked why Marco Rubio why the US signed the MoU when Point 5 clearly says that Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio says that he doesn't interpret the document to say that.

5. Upon signing this Memorandum of Understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements, to the best of its ability, for the safe passage of commercial vessels, free of charge for 60 days, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. Commercial shipping will begin immediately and will be fully established within 30 days, subject to the removal of technical and military obstacles and demining operations carried out by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Islamic Republic of Iran will consult with the Sultanate of Oman regarding the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in accordance with applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz, and will also exchange views with other Gulf coastal states.

It very clearly says that the Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz to make arrangements for commercial vessels for 60 days. Also that Iran would consult Oman for future administration of the strait. The document does not say that the US can open the strait.

The US official position is that the US doesn't know how to read the MoU document that Trump signed in France and that's why the US is attacking Iran.

https://nitter.net/DropSiteNews/status/2080336864859349168#m

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of Iran’s parliament and chief negotiator with US, mocked the US over surging energy costs on X.

“They wanted to punish Iran,” he wrote. “Punished themselves with triple-digit oil instead. 10/10 strategy,” with three applause emojis.

The post carried a cartoon of a cyclist labeled “World/US economy” jamming a stick into his own wheel under the caption “Let’s blockade Iran, Easy Peasy,” then sprawled on the pavement beside a list of $150 oil, global recession, $7 gasoline and 10% mortgages, ending with the bicyclist blaming Iran: “Iran did this.”

Brent crude jumped 7.2% Thursday to $100.88, its first time above $100 in two months, after Ansar Allah struck two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea. Just two weeks ago it sat below $72. Goldman Sachs says it could reach $120 by the fourth quarter if Hormuz stays disrupted.

US gasoline has climbed from under $3 in February to over $4, a figure Democrats raised repeatedly at this week’s Senate hearing on war funding.

nitter is saying "tweet not found" randomly currently. xcancel is also not working. poast is run by a bad person allegedly. the tweets are not deleted and you can open them on twitter.

https://nitter.net/IRIMFA_SPOX/status/2079881070493786271#m

Iran spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei (12 hours ago)

The repeated U.S. attacks and threats against Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities not only constitute a flagrant violation of the core principles of the UN Charter, international law, and the relevant resolutions of the IAEA Board of Governors, General Conference, and UN Security Council, but also reveal the United States’ deep-rooted enmity toward Iran’s scientific progress and technological development.

Iran’s nuclear activities have been fully declared to the IAEA in accordance with its safeguards obligations. Washington’s obsessive focus on Kolang Kouh where no nuclear activity is taking place is nothing more than a fabricated pretext for aggression, destruction, and sabotage. By the way, where is the Director General of the IAEA, who is also a candidate for UN Secretary-General? The Iranian people stand resolute and united, ready to confront with full strength any act of U.S. hostility or violation of their country’s sovereignty and national security.

https://nitter.net/mb_ghalibaf/status/2079980825672651246#m

Iran parliament speaker MB Ghalibaf (6 hours ago) (translated)

The equation of this war is clear: either all or no one.

In the region where we don’t sell oil, no one will sell oil. If our security is not ensured, no infrastructure will be safe and the security of the strait is in the absence of U.S. forces. We have repeatedly said that the situation in the strait does not go back to before the war.

https://nitter.net/araghchi/status/2079997466649448760#m

Iran FM Seyed Abbas Araghchi (5 hours ago)

Our defense doctrine is clear: eye for an eye.

Any aggression against Iran, including our infrastructure, will compel a powerful and decisive response.

Those who contribute to such aggression, whatever the kind of support, will also be considered as legitimate targets.

https://nitter.net/IRIMFA_SPOX/status/2080000957136695662#m

Iran spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei (4 hours ago) (translated)

Today, we buried the newly found pieces of our children’s bodies in Minab; with each piece, a part of our being went to the ground. Every piece of our children’s small bodies is a lasting document of suffering that will never be erased from Iranian memory.

But this grief does not belong to one nation; it is a warning to the conscience of the international community. The greatest threat to human civilization is the normalization of an idea that, claiming to “help nations,” spreads all legal and moral boundaries to demonstrate the naked power, an idea that denies technology in the service of destruction, the media in the service of denial, and the truth in the service of false narratives, and calmly justifies the most heinous crimes.

https://nitter.net/IRIMFA_SPOX/status/2080008653252526591#m

Iran spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei (4 hours ago)

It's a shame that throughout the US Secretary of War’s congressional hearing, not a single question was asked regarding the "human" aspect of America's ruthless war against the Iranian nation, fully aware that this was an illegal war of choice accompanied by countless war crimes, #Minab and #Lamerd being just two of them.

Marco Rubio says Iran doesn't have civilian infrastructure because Iran only spends money on its military. If Iran has no infrastructure, then what is the US attacking? The US attacked the largest civilian bridge in Iran, 'B1 bridge', which was constructed starting in 2015.

Pete Hegseth testified before congress yesterday to request $37.5 billion additional funding for the Iran war on top of the regular Pentagon budget. The proposed 2027 military budget is $1.5 trillion dollars, almost double the military budget of 2026.

The propaganda narrative doesn't make sense on face value. "We have to bomb Iran because Iran doesn't build any new civilian infrastructure" What are you bombing? "We're bombing Iran's new civilian infrastructure."

and everyone should follow proper garbage disposal procedures.

Nah. It says he was being payed by a woman to fly to a remote village in Alaska and that woman had a 6-pack of Buddweiser. Alcohol is banned at the destination. The pilot and the passenger were both charged with misdemeanor. The incident happened in April 2012. The Alaska Supreme Court ruled that it was fair for his plane to be seized. Now it's going to the US Supreme Court.