a couple snippets from the interview. the first snippet is about Tom Morelloa doing some concert to promote voting in the midterms. the second snippet is him saying that he didn't vote for Kamala because of her complicity in Gaza genocide, he doesn't use the word genocide.

https://archive.is/o6xOR

bold is interviewer, non-bold in tom

Is there an argument that people’s focus on Ed Sheeran is indeed a distraction from what they should be focusing on?

Yeah, 100 percent. It’s all right to shame him in this moment because he deserves the shame, but not the focus. The focus is your and my tax dollars are going to commit horrific war crimes in the Middle East, and that, I believe, should be the focus and what we should be doing our best to stop in its tracks.

It’s a clickbait, it’s salacious, it’s, “Oh my gosh, poor Ed Sheeran.” First of all, has Ed Sheeran never seen a Macklemore performance before in the last three years? He certainly should’ve known what he was getting into.

The one thing that’s sort of adjacent is, this is a time where speech is being vilified and is a crime, where the truth is a crime, where skin color is a crime, where immigrant status is a crime, where gender is a crime, where sexual orientation is a crime. And it’s my belief that the true crime is the rise of authoritarianism, and the true crime is the erosion of freedoms, and the true crime is an impending environmental disaster. And so my hope at each one of my shows, I deputize the audience as anti-fascist crime fighters, and that’s really the way that I think you have to look at the world right now. Like, what are the real crimes that are happening, and what is it that you and I can do to stop it?

Now that I’ve gotten you fired up — your Power to the People Festival. What is its most essential purpose?

It is not PR or hyperbole to say it is a festival of peace, love, justice, and music. In a time where war is celebrated, this is a festival of peace. In a time where hatred and division are rife, this is a festival of love. In a time where injustice is the norm, this is a festival celebrating fighting for justice. In a time where there’s a lot of shitty music, there’s gonna be a lot of great music on this stage, so we’re going for four for four.

How much were the midterms on your mind when you scheduled this?

As my dear departed mom, Mary Morello, who passed away at 102 years old, was a very political person, said, “You’ve got to fight the fascists every which way you can.” One of those ways is at the ballot box. It’s not the only way, and you should not just think that because you’ve done that. Voting is a piece on the chessboard, and that you try to create an environment where in between the voting you can fight for a more just, a more peaceful, a more equal world.

And so, is the festival three weeks before the midterms? Yeah. Does the money from the festival go to voting rights organizations? Yeah, it does, but the festival is about something much bigger than that. It’s about what kind of world do you really wanna live in, and should we fight for that world, or should we settle for the one that’s being spoon-fed for us by the oligarchs?

Returning as promised to the electoralism issue — there are some on the left who tend to argue it doesn’t matter, don’t bother voting, both sides are the same. So what would you say to someone on the left who says, “Listen, man, I listen to Rage Against the Machine, and I know everyone’s the same. It’s about tearing down the power structure. Doesn’t matter who you vote for. I’m not voting”?

On the one hand, I think that rebellion is self-care, in a way, but I answered that already. Mary Morello was 100 percent right. You have to stop the fascists every which way you can. First of all, a lot of people who I greatly respect and admire the sacrifice they’ve made to try to get people with my color skin to be able to vote in this country, and have died, been lynched for it, they’ve been shot in the back for it, and it’s very disrespectful to their memory to do that.

But that in and of itself is not going to change the levers of power in a significant way. It’s not. It’s not. You should do it. But it would be like, okay, great, you vote, and on the next day you start working. You start working harder for the world you really want without compromise and without apology. And not just putting in the hands of whatever corporate Democrat you choke down your vote for in that particular election, that it’s your job to make the world the way that you think it could be to help those that are the most in need and to hold those accountable who are most guilty.

Do you feel that people on the left should have voted for Kamala Harris?

I’m crystal clear that people’s conscience cannot allow them to do something that they fundamentally believe is wrong. I was the scheduling secretary for United States Senator Alan Cranston. I saw how the corporate Democrat sausage is made. It is worse than you think. And there is a reason, there is a righteous fury at the corporate controlled, money controlled electoral system we have that is absolutely legitimate, and people cannot choke down — I understand it — voting for a candidate that’s responsible for what happened in Gaza, and they just can’t do it, and I’m not gonna blame them for that.

But I think that putting it on them is the most cowardly thing. Put it on the fucking Democratic Party. First of all, I don’t believe it’s their responsibility and they’re never gonna necessarily never do the right thing, but I think it’s all of our responsibility to co-create the world that we want and not point fingers at people that were just like, “Well, you know, my conscience didn’t allow me to do that, so it’s your fault.” I will not co-sign that.

Did you vote for Kamala?

I certainly did not.

You did not?

Did not. I couldn’t do it.

I didn’t realize that.

V for Vendetta — that one inch of who you are belongs to you, and they can’t have it. Now, I live in a state where it may not have moved the meter, but I just couldn’t do it. Couldn’t do it.

When’s the last time that you didn’t vote for the Democratic candidate?

Can’t remember the last time I did.

Wow, okay. I thought you were softening a little bit.

Can’t remember the last time I did.

[–] [S] 5 points 6 hours ago

I don't have time to do an investigation for myself on each point of the article. I wanted to make a quick summary of each section because I know there are a lot of users who don't read articles like they should.

Some of the points do seem like actual coincidences. I'm not someone who believes that coincidences means conspiracy.

For me, the most suspicious thing is Israel was so quick to call it an act of terrorism. Terrorism is a type of intent. One pilot could attack another pilot over many different intents, maybe a personal dispute between them. Also they blamed Iran pretty quickly too.

To the people who read my summary, please reply to the base thread and please also read the article for more detail about each point.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 12 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

    The article lists reasons why the author believes that the incident is staged. These are my summaries of each section.

    1. Netanyahu held an unplanned meeting with the president of UAE president, 3 days earlier
    2. An Omani pilot would not be allowed to fly to Israel.
    3. Whether a plane could recover from a fall going as fast as reported
    4. Suspicious passengers
    5. Whether the pilot could open the cockpit door while injured
    6. Landing in Saudi Arabia instead of Jordan
    7. Differing reports about what weapon was used.
    8. Israel's eagerness to blame Iran
    9. Netanyhu is up for re-election soon. Suspicious that the incident happened close to this.
    10. UAE involvement?
    11. Contradictions in early reports
    12. The plane allegedly flew for over an hour while missing rudder.
    13. Heroic narrative crafted around a plumber

    PressTV changed the UI on their website from Blue to Yellow.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 23 hours ago

    here's what South Korea and Japan said

    The missile was launched from the Wonsan area at around 6.30 a.m. on Saturday (2130 GMT, Friday) and flew more than 700 kilometres (434 ​miles), the South Korean military said in a statement. Seoul and Washington were analysing ​the test for details, it added.

    Japan's coast guard, in an emailed statement citing ⁠the Japanese defence ministry, said the object may have been a ballistic missile and appeared to ​have come down, warning ships to take precautions.

    South Korea's military said it has raised its monitoring ​of any further missile tests and will share intelligence with the US and Japan.

    The South Korean presidential office's national security council convened an emergency meeting on Saturday to assess the situation after the missile launch, the office said in ​a statement.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/north-korea-fires-unidentified-projectile-toward-sea-off-east-coast-seoul-says-2026-10-02/

  • source
  •  

    Strategic Missile Launching Drill Conducted in Eastern Region of DPRK

    Pyongyang, October 4 (KCNA) -- At dawn of October 3, a drill was staged to launch an intermediate-range strategic missile from an eastern region of the DPRK toward the East Sea of Korea.

    The drill was conducted as part of the efforts to train the missile soldiers operating the hypersonic strategic weapon system in handling their equipment and evaluate the reliability, efficiency and mobility of the DPRK's war deterrent.

    Respected Comrade Kim Jong Un, General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and President of the State Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, oversaw the launching drill on the spot.

    Among the spectators were Kim Jong Sik, first vice department director of the C.C., WPK, and Jang Chang Ha, general director of the Missile Administration of the DPRK.

    Noting that it is a very important measure for ensuring national security and a responsible action of our army to build up the powerful and reliable nuclear deterrent through sustained verification of major components of the war deterrent, improvement of their performance and mastery of the capabilities for their successful operation and to show the counterattack means of our army in constant mobilization posture, Comrade Kim Jong Un said:

    "Through today's launching drill, the strategic missile soldiers have fully demonstrated their professional qualifications and counterattack posture, clearly showing that they are very good at operating their major offensive system and they are always available for mobilization. They also added confidence to our deterrent.

    I highly appreciate commanding officers and soldiers of the missile unit who participated in the drill.

    We must continue our responsible efforts nonstop to constantly and repeatedly make the enemy recognize the reliability and fatality of our strategic offensive means.

    This is a form of exercising deterrent.

    As always expressed clearly, such activities on our part are definitely aimed at more rapidly developing the country's nuclear war deterrent.

    This is indispensable for protecting national security and stability in today's geopolitical environment. There will be no change in such view and line of ours.

    We must deter various threats by dint of powerful deterrent and ensure a safe environment for the building and activities of our state."

    The missile used in the drill was launched towards the northeast direction and hit the target point 1 000 km away from the East Sea of Korea at 43°36' 28.04" latitude and 138°00' 47.02" longitude.

    Comrade Kim Jong Un expressed expectation and belief that all the missile forces would remain faithful to their missions of defending the sovereignty and security of the Republic in a responsible combat posture. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/2bd661f15c5178018e860a9ce35e555d

    https://archive.is/X892e

    Kim Yo Jong, Department Director of C.C., WPK, on Strategic Weapon Launching Drill

    Pyongyang, October 3 (KCNA) -- At dawn of this morning, a drill of firing a strategic weapon toward the East Sea of Korea was conducted.

    An intermediate-range strategic missile was used for the drill.

    The head of state personally oversaw the drill of a firepower sub-unit undertaking an exclusive special mission.

    The joint chiefs of staff of the ROK, which tracked our drill, announced that the missile flew more than 700 km, while the Japan defence ministry termed the range 680 km.

    They are interesting numbers.

    We have already witnessed similar announcements four times and, finally, we came to the conclusion that the superiority of the special flight mode applied to the missiles in our possession has been verified in practice.

    Of course, we should neither believe the enemy's tracking results nor satisfy ourselves of them, but such figures help take a look at the limitations of the enemy's tracking capability and the special features of our missiles.

    Whenever we applied the wave-like trajectory mode to missiles, the enemy failed to track the targets from their first skip points.

    Extension of the trajectory at the downward stage gives the numbers quite similar to the numbers of the ranges announced by the enemy.

    The enemy always made such a lame excuse that there is a limit to the detection capability because of the curvature of the earth's surface, but in fact this just serves as a proof of our perfect missile capability and the most scientific "evaluation index" confirming the power and reliability of our weapon system.

    They should acknowledge the speed of the missile.

    And they would be well advised to recollect our announcements that it is capable of changing its flight orbit at a low altitude and AI was introduced into it.

    In other words, this means that there is no way to avoid this attack.

    Representatives of the Missile Administration reported to the head of state that it is possible to set at least four flight orbit modes according to a purpose and target with the technology recently introduced.

    The head of state expressed the belief that any country in the world could not have access to such technology for at least several years. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/b3d26e7f14c26a50a6173db2e075687f

    https://archive.is/wObxh

     

    Eminem is no stranger to controversy throughout his career, whether it's for his lyricism or his political views. In the latter category, his upcoming feature on "7 Sins" from the new Kid Rock album Halfway To Jesus (dropping October 17) has divided fans who remember his previous condemnations of Donald Trump. On the other hand, Kid Rock is an ardent MAGA supporter with other right-wing inclinations. But he's also a longtime friend of Slim Shady, and he reportedly addressed this collaboration.

    Complex reportedly confirmed via a representative from Em's camp that the team-up is actually real and official, as many Internet users questioned its veracity upon its announcement. Also, the publication reportedly obtained an excerpt from Halfway To Jesus' foreword that goes into the mindset behind the link-up.

    "I'm proud of the guests who joined me, especially my old friend Eminem," Kid Rock reportedly expressed. "His verse speaks to something we’ve talked about and that really needs to be heard: we differ politically and on other things, but we’ve stayed friends through it all. We hope that sets an example for people who’ve lost friends or stopped talking to family because they think differently."

    Previously, Eminem has criticized Donald Trump often, even showing up to a Kamala Harris rally in Detroit in 2024. He had told Trump supporters to stop being fans of him in the past, later empathizing with them being fooled by his promises. However, the Detroit MC shares that Motor City connection with Kid Rock. They have various collaborations and moments of camaraderie over the past four decades.

    Most recently, Marshall Mathers had tweeted that "one thing" they can agree on is their love for the Detroit Lions. The rapper, rock, country, and now Christian rock artist had admitted they disagree politically. But he still showed Em love for expressing his beliefs.

    It seems like fans who want more context for all of this will have to wait for Halfway To Jesus' release on October 17. Many fans expressed outrage or less indignant criticism over the move. Regardless of what they thematically explore on their collaboration "7 Sins," the damage is already done for lots of listeners.

     

    https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/zach-bryan-free-palestine-shirt-gillette-stadium-macklemore-1235636423/

    On the first of his two-night run at Gillette Stadium on Friday, Zach Bryan hit the stage wearing a shirt that read “Free Palestine.” The singer-songwriter appeared to be sending a message to stadium and New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft after he banned Macklemore from the venue following the Seattle rapper’s comments while touring with Ed Sheeran.

    Reps for Bryan and Gillette stadium did not immediately return a request for comment.

    [–] [S] 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    South Korea (ROK) has accused North Korea (DPRK) of being responsible to the injury of 2 ROK soldiers by "mine explosion incident", on the border area, September 21.

    In another press statement, DPRK said that the accusation was absurd because nobody had entered that area in over half a century. In today's press statement, Kim Yo Jong mocks Seoul for demanding an apology when DPRK is not responsible for the incident.

  • source
  •  

    Press Statement of Kim Yo Jong, Department Director of C.C., WPK

    Pyongyang, October 2 (KCNA) -- Kim Yo Jong, department director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, issued the following press statement on Friday:

    The enemy remains a foe.

    This is a crucial conclusion we have reached again through another farce created by Seoul.

    Seoul clearly revealed its sinister intention to plunge the situation in the Korean peninsula again into a critical state for its selfish purpose, since it hastily made a groundless conclusion that the recent case of mine explosion in the border area was due to someone's "covert and deliberate mine-laying" and announced what is called a poor "official-stand statement".

    They even called for an "apology". It is really despicable.

    It is necessary to think reasonably.

    Why do they suppose that we would have done so to go with them?

    It is needed to know exactly about the true intention of why we are fortifying the border line.

    Explaining in a simple and clear way, this is aimed at shutting down the door forever so that we will have nothing to do with the ROK and even wild animals can not come and go.

    To be frank, we shudder even at the thought of the ROK tribes who would describe even a flock of birds in the air as "drones from the north".

    So, it is our strongest desire to cut off the relationship forever with those tribes that make troubles.

    We do not allow the slightest space or room for us to go with the ROK.

    Committing the suspicious accident beyond common sense by themselves, they came to be put in a dilemma. After all, it seems they are resorting again to their habitual act of finding fault with other.

    Indeed, it's boring, awful and disgusting.

    We're witnessing another really absurd thing once again.

    Seoul should no longer play cheap tricks and stop at once its nonsense to tarnish the image of our state.

    The word "provocation" the ROK tribes use so often against us is their most favorite one. We wonder if they know the exact meaning of the word.

    From a commonsense point of view, the word "provocation" can be used for any act of shifting one's blame onto others, and such acts should be termed "provocation" as drone provocations made by the Yoon Suk Yeol regime and the present Seoul authority against the DPRK.

    Another great irony is that the inferiors like the small fry were busy with finding fault with others by releasing the results of the investigation and official stand statement, whereas the president was present at a commemorative ceremony and expressed the "will" to take practical and consistent measures to defuse military tension.

    It's the climax of the farce that everyone should watch.

    It seems that Part 2 of the farce started.

    He seems as if he is going to play a righteous leading character after making the situation complicated.

    We wonder who are the leading actor and the supernumerary, but we want him to be a popular "righteous actor".

    Those who wrote the playbook for the farce, directed it and played the actors deserve the precious "citation". -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/d4a749a018dbcb54c8aff12bc3f9943c

    https://archive.is/MEGv5

    [–] 50 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    They already killed old.reddit last month to prevent people from browsing without creating an account. I bet they're doing this to target other reddit frontends like redlib.

  • source
  •  

    PM Burnham says the UK Government "can confirm our belief that we believe Iran to have played a part" in the RAF Fairford incident.

    I can confirm Iran's belief that releasing supposed terrorists working for foreign states really says it all.

    You're barking up the wrong tree.

    https://nitter.click/araghchi/status/2105397896929476928

     

    Press Statement of Kim Yo Jong, Department Director of C.C., WPK

    Pyongyang, September 30 (KCNA) -- Kim Yo Jong, department director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, issued the following press statement titled "Ringleaders of provocation should be prepared for paying price for the farce of their own making" on Sept. 29:

    Recently, the ROK military gangsters committed another provocation against the DPRK, announcing the "investigation results" in connection with the incident of mine explosion that occurred in the southern border area.

    It is too low and dirty as befitting the tribes of the ROK.

    Of course, such a farce is by no means a new.

    When the mine explosion in question occurred on September 21, we had already anticipated the scenario of Seoul and seen through the true intention of the conspiratorial farce being staged by the ROK military gangsters.

    In conclusion, the incident is a clear farce reminiscent of the "wooden-box mine incident" which disturbed the world more than ten years ago, in consideration of the time and method of provocation.

    At that time the puppet forces forcibly linked the "mine explosion incident" that occurred on the western border with the DPRK and continuously escalated the tension under the pretext of it.

    What should not be overlooked is the fact that the armed gangsters of the ROK are now cooking up the groundless results and "justifying their conduct" for political and military provocation against the DPRK, openly talking about "reasonable and corresponding enforcement of measures".

    How can we sit and watch their despicable act of rashly doubting anyone after exploding a mine of doubtful provenance and talking about the breach of the Armistice Agreement.

    Where can we find else such an absurd, malicious and gangster-like attitude?

    The rulers of Seoul including those of the "People Power Party" have already unanimously said that the withdrawn loudspeaker against the DPRK should be set up in keeping with the futile bravery of the new minister of Defense.

    It is absurd that they made a conclusion about the origin of the said mine exploded in the barren land which they had never set foot for more than a half century.

    It is the height of impudence that the tribes of the ROK are trying to fabricate "material evidence" for proving it after shifting the blame for the incident onto the other.

    We are closely watching why the ROK military rogues need the "mine incident" at this time in connection with their extremely scandalous acts which have been witnessed repeatedly in the southern border area in recent days.

    The enemies' provocative acts near the southern border area are going beyond the limit with each passing day.

    As the world knows, our army has been building the barriers in the southern border area as part of the work of strengthening the border two years ago, and this is only a thorough exercise of sovereignty unrelated with any military purpose.

    However, the ROK military warmongers are seriously threatening the personal safety of our soldiers through warning broadcasting and warning shots, teasing our personnel mobilized for building the border barriers about the groundless "crossing of the border".

    Especially from August, the enemy has been engaged in warning broadcasting and warning shots every day.

    The "crossing the border" of our soldiers touted by the ROK military is a deliberate and planned strained assertion to shift the responsibility for escalating tension on to the DPRK.

    Clearly speaking, our soldiers have never crossed the border.

    This is a clear cavil and a provocation.

    The ROK military should think first of all about what the world will say about its inability to distinguish its own land and other's land, failing to properly distinguish the boundary which can be confirmed by the naked eye.

    We will never remain a passive onlooker to the hostile acts causing great concern in the border area.

    When a single bullet is hit on our land, they must be prepared for a lot.

    If the ROK military gangsters fire at our soldiers carrying on the permanent project for the southern border, not warning shots, our border units will take immediate and merciless retaliate attack.

    The counteraction principles against them have already been issued to the border defence units and the army of the DPRK decided to take measures to increase the tactical counterattack means in the direction of the demilitarized zone of the 21st Infantry Division of the 3rd Corps of the ROK army where the provocations are frequent in recent days.

    Explicitly speaking once again, it is clear that if the frequency of malicious accusation and provocation against us in the border region are frequent and lead to an encroachment on our actual territory and military sovereignty, the rogue group will have to face a situation that has not yet been experienced.

    I seriously warn you that it would be a good idea to weigh the relative advantages with reasonable thinking.

    If you are going to display "bravery" with an unpopular barbarous courage, you will only face a miserable and catastrophic position.

    The dramatic culmination of the farce of Seoul will never be fun and the responsibility for all consequences will be entirely for the party to the provocation. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/d2f0e6206efdd90a0da4c4c8b579b12a

    https://archive.is/zSYpj

     

    President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday establishing America.gov, an AI-powered government portal through which users can access public services and search thousands of federal databases.

    The order, “Streamlining access to government services through America.gov,” establishes the website and directs all agencies to integrate their public-facing services into the platform within 90 days.

    Trump signed the order hours before he is set to meet with top AI executives in a lunch meeting at the White House.

    It directs senior officials, including those at the National Design Studio, to establish the website as a single access point for Americans seeking federal government services such as passport replacement. NDS was created by an August 2025 executive order and is led by Airbnb cofounder Joe Gebbia.

    “With America.gov the federal government no longer stands in your way, it only stands at your service” President Donald Trump said at an event announcing the website.

    He added, “we’re simplifying it. We’re glamorizing it. We’re making it what it should be.”

    The website says it is sourced from “official U.S. government resources” and prompts users to use the platform as a chatbot, asking questions about anything from applying for a passport to information about national parks.

    Administration officials celebrated the launch, touting it as the start of a new relationship between the government and its people.

    “We’ve become used to a government so big it makes the citizens feel very, very small,” Trump said. “But with America.gov, the entire U.S. government will fit in the plan.”

    executive order https://archive.is/4kMlu

    summary https://archive.is/1cNjp

    view more: next ›