Traditional Food of Korean Nation

Pyongyang, September 24 (KCNA) -- On the day of Chusok (Harvest Moon Day), a folk holiday of Koreans, they prepared various dishes.

Among them are Songphyon (a half-moon-shaped rice cake stuffed with beans and flavored with pine needles).

On all other folk holidays, Koreans enjoy this dish. Such a rice cake is more delicious when it is made from new rice on the day of Chusok. The rice cake prepared on the day is called Chusok Songphyon.

Every region of the country makes unique Songphyon of various shapes and sizes.

In Kangwon Province, they make such a cake from potato farina and groundnuts.

Chusok falls on the 25th of September (the 15th day of the eighth lunar month) this year. -0-

http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/e7dd4865acc4141a6929f0af195b28c2

https://archive.is/14Lwl

 

Press Statement of DPRK Foreign Minister

Pyongyang, September 24 (KCNA) -- Choe Son Hui, foreign minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, on Thursday released the following press statement "The DPRK remains unchanged in its will to keep nuclear weapons forever":

The U.S., Japan and the ROK fully expressed their anachronistic and confrontational nature once again to remain invariably hostile to the DPRK by raising the unrealistic "denuclearization" target.

At the tripartite talks held on the sideline of the 81st session of the UN General Assembly, the diplomatic authorities of the U.S., Japan and the ROK made public a "joint statement", in which they reconfirmed the firm will to "denuclearize" someone according to the "resolution" of the UN Security Council.

This proved once again that no matter how the U.S. and its allies change their expressions and let loose a string of rhetoric, they do not give up a daydream about "denuclearization" and can never drop it.

It is not new that the "denuclearization" issue was discussed at the meeting of the U.S., Japan and the ROK which have adopted antagonism toward the DPRK as their state policies, and on the contrary, it would have been surprised and questionable if there had been no mention about it.

As the foreign minister of the DPRK, I reaffirm and reconfirm in the strongest tone of voice the steadfast will of our state to keep nuclear weapons through all ages, which is irreversible in any case and will remain unchanged forever.

The strong-arm policy against the DPRK came to failure, and any state or force can never compel us to withdraw from defending the national sovereignty and the core interests.

The coexistence of confrontation and dialogue may be workable for anyone, but they can never be considerable one for the DPRK.

Steadfast is our appreciation and stand that nuclear weapons are the core component of national sovereignty and the most reliable guarantee for defending sovereign rights that no one can provoke. And the more loudly the U.S. and its allies may cry out for "denuclearization", the more it will only prove the validity of our state's just access to nuclear weapons and give a justification for strengthening them and harden its stand against the U.S. and the enemies.

To deny the reality is to give up the future.

There is no change in the fact that the DPRK's position as a nuclear weapons state will be everlasting as inviolable one in disregard of the hostile forces' rhetorical assertion, and it is inevitable to reorganize and fix the geopolitical structure centered on the DPRK with nukes. -0-

http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/75c7c76711171497b098d4f5109fe0cc

https://archive.is/d2Mr9

Spokesman for DPRK Foreign Ministry Issues Press Statement

Pyongyang, September 24 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea released the following press statement on September 24:

A "joint statement" accusing the DPRK of its self-defensive nuclear activities was cooked up and released at a recent ministerial meeting of the "Friends of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty" held in New York.

The Foreign Ministry of the DPRK strongly condemns and rejects as a grave political provocation against the DPRK such behavior of the hostile forces who took issue with the DPRK's legitimate and just exercise of its sovereign rights under the pretext of the promotion of earlier effectuation of the CTBT.

The member states of the "Friends of the CTBT", which sponsored the recent ministerial meeting, are the allies or satellite countries of the U.S., the chief culprit systematically destroying the international nuclear non-proliferation system. So they have neither qualification nor face to debate the DPRK's legitimate exercise of its right to self-defence.

It has been 30 years since the conclusion of the CTBT, but it has not yet come into effect. It is entirely because of the U.S. and its vassal forces which have openly committed criminal nuclear proliferation out of their wild ambition to secure their global nuclear hegemony.

The U.S.-led nuclear proliferation, from the sharing of nuclear weapons with NATO in the 1950s and deployment of its nuclear weapons abroad to the emergence of the nuclear submarine alliance AUKUS and the transfer of nuclear submarine technology to the ROK, has been recorded as grave threats to international peace and security.

In particular, remilitarization of Japan revealing its ill-intended scheme to arm itself with nuclear weapons through the modification of the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and the retrogressive constitutional amendments, oblivious of the lesson from its defeat in the Second World War, constitutes an actual security challenge to be strictly watched and deterred by the international community.

The criminal acts of the countries failing to honour their nuclear-disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation duty are being connived at, but a sovereign state's legitimate exercise of its right to self-defence is being faulted. As such abnormal situation lingers, the international nuclear disarmament system and the nuclear non-proliferation system are being shaken to their roots.

Such stereotyped racket of some dishonest forces has no impact on the DPRK's position as a nuclear weapons state.

The DPRK will never tolerate any attempts to deny its national sovereignty and constitutional position but make positive contributions to the international efforts for ensuring peace of the Korean peninsula and the rest of the world as a responsible nuclear weapons state. -0-

http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/165ae340c9698b65daf0af3ece1b2e74

https://archive.is/A9zX8

 

WASHINGTON -- Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday gave remarks at the arrival ceremony at the White House in Washington, DC, the United States.

The following is the full text of the remarks:

Honorable President Donald J. Trump and Mrs. Melania Trump,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Dear Friends,

I'm very glad to pay a state visit to your beautiful country, the United States of America. Thank you, President Trump and Mrs. Trump, for the warm hospitality you have extended to me and my wife. On behalf of the 1.4 billion and more Chinese people, I wish to begin by extending sincere greetings to the American people and warm congratulations on the 250th anniversary of the US independence.

Both China and the United States are great countries, and both the Chinese and American peoples are great peoples. I am visiting the United States at President Trump's invitation to carry on our friendship, expand cooperation, and promote the well-being of both our peoples.

Facing the changes in our world, in our times, and of historical significance today, China and the United States, as two major countries, shoulder a historic responsibility of advancing human development and progress.

Mr. President, during your visit to China this year, we agreed to build a constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability, and this is widely welcomed by the people of our two countries and the international community. I am ready to work with you to steer the giant ship of China-US relationship on a steady course toward the future.

-- We should strengthen communication. China and the United States are different in national conditions, but through candid, in-depth and continued dialogue, our two countries can understand each other better, seek common ground while shelving differences, and build up mutual trust. President Trump and I have respect for each other. We have built personal rapport and stayed in touch. We encourage our government departments, such as those in charge of foreign affairs, economic matters, financial cooperation, law enforcement and people-to-people exchanges, to catch up on strengthening contact, and we support our legislative bodies in increasing exchanges.

-- We should cooperate with sincerity. The interests of China and the United States are deeply intertwined, and there is plenty of room for us to work together. China-US cooperation may not solve every problem in the world. But, without our cooperation, it would be hard to solve many of the world's problems. China keeps its door wide open, welcomes American companies wanting to invest and do business there. We hope Chinese companies are treated fairly here in the United States. Working together, we can lengthen the list of cooperation, and shorten the list of issues. Both China and the United States are leading nations in artificial intelligence. We have both the capability and responsibility to develop and manage AI for good, and ensure that the development of AI is always under human control and serves the well-being of the people. On counternarcotics and law enforcement, the Chinese side is willing to strengthen cooperation with the United States. Our two sides may also increase direct flights to facilitate two-way travel and trade.

-- We should coexist in peace. As I have said many times, China and the United States, as two major countries, stand to gain from cooperation and will both lose in confrontation. We do not need to avoid mentioning competition, but our competition should be a healthy one and should be kept within bounds. It should be a race of catching up with one another, not a wrestle in which one either wins or loses. China and the United States must hold the line of no conflict and no confrontation between us, and we can certainly find the right path for our two great countries to get along on this planet we both call home. Our two militaries should maintain regular dialogue, and improve mechanisms for crisis communication and prevention. The Thucydides Trap can be overcome.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Dear Friends,

During the Second World War, Chinese and Americans fought shoulder to shoulder against fascist aggression. Chinese people have never forgotten that part of history, nor have the American people. The hope of the China-US relationship lies in our people, and its future lies with the young. I am glad to announce an invitation for 100,000 young Americans to visit China for exchanges and study in the coming five years.

The giant panda has been an envoy of friendship between the Chinese and Americans. Here, I have a piece of good news. In a few days, two pandas, Ping Ping and Fu Shuang, will come to their new home in Zoo Atlanta and meet with the American people.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Dear Friends,

Achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again can go hand in hand. Let us meet the people's expectation and show our historical initiative. Let us keep advancing the cause of friendship between our two peoples and work together to build a better world!

Thank you.

 

Macklemore has announced the “Free Palestine” tour, with three shows set for Dublin (Oct. 26), Paris (Oct. 29) and London (Oct. 30). The news comes after the Grammy-winning rapper was infamously dropped as opener from Ed Sheeran‘s U.S. tour after making “Free Palestine” speeches while on stage at two concerts at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.

Per Live Nation, the “Free Palestine” tour will “bring Macklemore together with artists and friends for a series of performances that center Palestine and Palestinians, and help provide humanitarian aid and support to the movement.”

Additionally, all proceeds from the concerts will benefit the following organizations: Anera, Glia, Gaza Soup Kitchen, Taawon, HEAL Palestine, Palestinian Youth Movement, Middle East Children’s Alliance, Jewish Voice for Peace, Medical Aid for Palestinians. Institute for Middle East Understanding, Palestine Children’s Relief Fund and UNRWA USA.

“If these last couple of weeks have shown us anything, it’s that something has shifted over the last three years,” Macklemore wrote in a statement on Instgaram while announcing the tour. “There has been a collective awakening around Palestinian liberation, the power of billionaires that try to censor that call, and what we expect from artists right now.”

“It’s 2026. Being apolitical during a genocide doesn’t work anymore,” he continued. “People are asking artists to show up, educate themselves and be in community. To use the stage for more than entertainment. To push back when the call for a Free Palestine is met with attempts to silence it… What happened to me is bigger than one artist or one stage. When the billionaire class can decide which voices are allowed on stage and which ones are too dangerous to hear, everyone should be paying attention.”

 

Full transcript below. I downloaded it from the UN website. I verified that it matched the video, there was 1 typo.

I had prepared a speech to present to you yesterday.
The United States President described us as terrorists.
We have been the victims of terrorism.
I come from an Iran in which our esteemed Supreme Leader was assassinated without any legal framework or reason.

I come from an Iran where, in truth, they bombed a school.
You see these children?
These children perished under bombs, with weapons used by the United States and Israel.
They were innocent, had committed no crimes.

Lamerd, one of the small cities in a province in Iran, a sports hall where children were busy playing.
The United States, by using weapons with multiple warheads, targeted that sports hall.
They martyred, assassinated, our scientists, our men, women, and children.
Innocent children who, in truth, had committed no crimes, no sins.

Those who are terrorists and train and protect terrorists describe us as such.
We have only defended ourselves.
We are not terrorists.
Our innocent people have been the targets of cowardly attacks and aggressions imposed upon our country, and we defended ourselves with utmost strength.

America and Israel attacked us, equipped with the latest technology and weapons systems, and our people stood steadfast.
Yes, they did hit us, but we did not bend the knee.
We did not bow our head.
We responded, but we did not hit civilian populations.

They came into surrounding territories and targeted our universities, our healthcare centers, our schools, our hospitals, our infrastructures—all of it against international law.
When I took over the responsibilities as President, they assassinated Ismail Haniyeh in Iran.
On the day of my inauguration, Israel targets any neighborhood, in any city, in any province, commits assassinations like a true terrorist.
In Gaza, over 80,000 innocent civilians have been murdered, brutally murdered.

Hundreds of thousands have been displaced.
They are committing genocide by using the so-called technologies that they have at their disposal.
Then they label others as terrorists.
Are we the sources of instability?

We only seek to live independently.
We are the ones who cause instability.
Those who are committing terrorism and committing crimes, are they the protectors of peace and stability?
None of the international laws have been adhered to by them.

This is what we're facing.
We don't want anything.
We have received our response.
We need strength, because a people which is unable to defend itself will be trampled upon in today's world.

We live in a world in which the powerful, instead of thinking about humanity, justice, fairness, and democracy, they seem to be the protectors and creators of instability and destruction.
Whomever they wish to discredit, they label them as terrorists.
Two hundred years—for the past two centuries— Iran has not attacked any country or any territory, but we've always defended ourselves steadfastly.
But now we're being accused of being source of instability in the region?

We're labeled terrorists?
And this has made it so that the path that we have chosen for ourselves requires power to defend ourselves.
We do not seek power in order to attack or commit aggression.
We seek energy for progress, not to threaten societies with weapons.

And we wish to cooperate and collaborate for security.
The people of Iran, in the past 7 months, our people, have been in the streets every night demonstrating in support of their land, of their homeland, so as to not allow those who were equipped and trained and armed by Israel and America to cause disruption in the security of their country.
For 7 months, day and night, they've been present in the streets.
They are our source of power and our support.

And that's why we stand fast.
Iran must be powerful so as to avoid being threatened, to avoid its future being threatened.
We do not wish to use our power for hegemony, and we do not seek our security in the insecurity of others.
Vis-à-vis Iran's defense, our defensive systems have been built so that no one can think that bombing of Iranian cities will go unanswered.

That is why we have the military power we do for defense.
But we say it clearly: in order to defend our country, we do not seek anyone's permission or approval.
We seek energy for progress.
For years, there have been—they have labeled centrifuges, international sanctions, other labels—when it comes to our nuclear technology.

But for our country, peaceful nuclear technology is part of our inherent progress.
For our sick people, it is cure and treatment.
For the agricultural sector, it is food security.
For industry, it is advancement and progress and supply of electrical energy.

Iran does not accept for nuclear technology to be at the exclusive disposal of some, of a handful.
We will not— we will not bow our head and give up the right that is inherently ours.
We say it clearly: no nuclear weapons, and no limitations to peaceful nuclear technology.
Our peace will not come in the field of battle.

But they must give the needed security to the people and nation of Iran.
We seek cooperation in order to have security.
We live in a region in which warfare knows no borders.
Crisis in one land will spill into the surrounding nations.

That's why Iran does not see her neighbors as security rivals.
We want to have strong neighbors.
In waters in the Strait of Hormuz, we do not— we cannot let some have free access and gain their interests from a waterway while at the same time using that waterway to impose their aggressions upon us, to impose insecurity upon us, to forbid us access to our own waterways.
They close access for us to our own waterway, yet they keep supplying missiles and deadly military technologies to bring insecurity to all of the lands surrounding that waterway.

We will not succumb to that.
The expansion of warfare will not result in security.
One cannot create chaos for the coastal countries seeking naval security.
Excellencies, vis-à-vis Palestine, Palestine remains an open wound on the conscience of the international community, and Gaza remains a symbol of the failure of international mechanisms to prevent civilian suffering.

For decades, resolutions have been adopted, yet occupation and violence have continued.
We cannot speak of peace while ignoring Palestine.
Lasting peace in West Asia is impossible without justice for Palestine.
As long as occupation, aggression, and injustice persist in the world, resistance will continue.

If it is weakened in one form, it will reemerge in others, perhaps stronger still.
Gaza, despite relentless killing and widespread devastation, has strengthened the people's faith in resistance.
And resistance cannot be destroyed by bombs and siege.
This is human nature.

If a human being is driven from his or her land, they will resist.
If their homes are subjected to bombings and aggression and attacks, they will resist.
What other choice do they have?
Succumb to bullying?

To be driven from their homes, from their lands, and remain silent in the face of these threats and dangers?
And when they defend themselves, they're labeled as terrorists?
The language makes it, unfortunately, clear the type of world that we're living in today.
Our regional issues must be resolved in the region, at the hands of the countries in the region, without becoming a toy in the hands of outside aggressors.

No relationship with a foreign power can become the tools of threatening neighboring countries in the region.
And now, a few words with those who are responsible for having planned and carried out aggressions against our country and our people have experienced firsthand the result of their deadly aggression.
And they have tested the strength and the steadfastness of Iran, and they have learned that Iran cannot be made to surrender.
Iran has never, ever been an aggressor, has never started a war, and has always shown her commitment to the negotiating table.

They imposed the war on us, but we proved—we have proven—that we're not afraid of fighting, of war, a war that is defensive in nature.
And we will stand in defense of our beloved Iran, our homeland, until our last breath.
Ladies and gentlemen, the topic of this gathering is mutual trust.
That cannot be achieved through words only, but by abstaining from using double standards.

Atomic and nuclear bombs are in the hands of the Israeli regime, but the inspectors are requested to come to Iran.
Israel has murdered savagely over 70,000 innocents in Gaza, but Iran, while behind the table of negotiation, was bombed.
Israel has the bombs, has weapons of mass destruction, not a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty during her shameful life has not allowed a single inspection.
But they are rewarded by all the means necessary for them to be able to bomb any capital in the region at will.

I will repeat: the nuclear weapon is in Israel, but the inspectors in Iran.
Israel kills, but Iran is subject to sanctions.
This is a true tragedy, which would make anyone hearing it laugh, at best.
They kill, we are sanctioned, we are punished.

Those who are ill, innocent people, the poor, the least privileged in our society, are the targets of these sanctions.
And this is what the United States seeks to do with all countries: to sacrifice the population of a country in order to achieve her illegitimate goals.
If we seek true peace and stability, we must apply a single standard for all.
Iran does not seek special treatment.

We seek equal rights.
We assume the responsibility, accept the responsibility that comes with it.
But Iran, during her prideful history, has learned the following lesson: a world without power is dangerous, but a world that only understands the language of war and bullyism will not be safe.
When we seek to have agendas to implement that only adhere to the benefits of a few privileged, we will have a world in disarray.

But we see that this will become a world much more dangerous for all of us.
We must not allow the 21st century to go back to an era of only the powerful and the bullying powers and the hegemons.
We must not build a world in which military power replaces legitimacy, terrorism replaces politics and negotiations, and war replaces dialogue and diplomacy.
Iran extends her hand towards the world.

We invite the world.
We call the world, not out of weakness, but out of a deep belief in our own power and steadfastness, to cooperate and collaborate.
Because of a deep belief that no one in this region will have security alone.
Either we will build it together, or we will have to live under insecurity together.

We seek to think about a world future in which security, fairness, justice, human dignity will become unalienable rights for all people, for all humans.
A future in which no people are driven to the sidelines, no voice is lost in the chaos of power, and no power will have the right to determine the future of a people other than those people themselves.
If we truly seek to have an order based on international law and standards, it must be based in justice, common human will, uplifting human dignity.
Because a peace that does not encompass all is no peace, and fairness and justice that does not embrace all is not worthy of being called justice and fairness.

But going back to the words of the President of the United States yesterday shows those who are experts in international law and dialogue and diplomacy and basic human standards that everything other about our country goes against the very essence and charter and the spirit of the United Nations.
He must know that the resistance of the Iranian people will only increase in the face of sanctions, increased pressure, increased bullying.
We will never bow our head or bend at the knee.
Iran must be understood by Mr. Trump and those who seek to bully us that we are ready for dialogue and diplomacy and negotiations without accepting the language of force.

I truly appreciate your time and presence here.
May God bless you all.

https://gadebate.un.org/en/81/iran-islamic-republic

[–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

Sorry for the delayed reply. I wanted to take some time to think about it more so that I don't create controversy or confusion. I can make a post in /c/hexbear for a discussion of a proposal. I would like to propose that slop posts must showcase social media posts, as stated in its original purpose. The original comm request says that the comm was intended to showcase social media posts.

Most of the posts on the slop comm already meet this requirement. It is things being posted into the comm like news articles, op-eds, videos of politicians speaking, images of food, etc that do not meet that definition.

https://hexbear.net/post/830

A SRS-style community dedicated to showcasing the worst of reactionaries across all social media, including Reddit.

EDIT: The community will be named !TheDunkTank.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 days ago*

    This hacker group is known for extortion. Earlier this year, ShinyHunters acquired the data of 275 million students at 8800 schools through the Instructure Canvas hack. ShinyHunters didn't release the Instructure Canvas data after the ransom was paid by Instructure.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Canvas_data_breach

    It says that Amtrak didn't pay the ransom and that the Amtrak data was published. A website called "haveibeenpwned" has acquired the Amtrak user data and you can check if you were affected by the hack by entering your email address.

    https://haveibeenpwned.com/Breach/Amtrak

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Have_I_Been_Pwned%3F

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Press Statement of DPRK Foreign Ministry Spokesperson

    Pyongyang, September 21 (KCNA) -- A spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea released the following press statement on Monday:

    The foolish behavior of the U.S. and the West is again sparking off criticism and ridicule of the world as they have openly ignored the principles of international law with respect for sovereignty and non-interference as the core and sought to save the structure of sanctions and pressure on the DPRK from its total bankruptcy.

    Recently, the U.S.-led "multilateral sanctions monitoring team (MSMT)" cooked up and announced a "report" pulling up the beneficial and routine economic cooperative relations between the DPRK and other countries and thus vividly revealed its true colors as a plot-breeding organization which distorts normal as abnormal and brands legal as illegal.

    The MSMT is a ghost group lacking any legality in the justification and purpose of existence. Its illegal act committed under the signboard of implementing the UN "resolution" is just a violation of the UN Charter and international law and a mockery of the international community.

    The U.S.-led isolated minority group has never been given the mission and authority to act on behalf of the UN, and "resolutions" against the DPRK cooked up by the UN Security Council wantonly violating the sovereignty and the rights to development of a sovereign state have never been recognized by the DPRK.

    What the MSMT, made up of pseudo experts addicted to the compilation of sanctions, has done is nothing but to devise all sorts of conspiracy theories under the U.S. command, and there is no room for discussion about the reliability and objectivity of such documents they have produced.

    The DPRK's relations of exchange and cooperation with other countries cannot be subject to interference or investigation of a third party in any case as they are the exercise of legitimate rights under bilateral and multilateral treaties and agreements.

    The UN Charter stipulates as one of the main purposes of the UN to develop friendly relations among nations on the principle of equality and self-determination, and the declaration on the principles of international law on friendship and cooperation among nations under the UN Charter, adopted as Resolution 2625 of the UN General Assembly, specifies that any country or group of states has no right to interfere in the internal affairs and external affairs of other countries.

    What should be questioned and rejected in the present international relations are bad behaviors of the U.S. and the West openly conducted worldwide, in contravention of the purpose and principle of the UN Charter which disallows the use of and threat by force against the political independence and territorial integrity of any country.

    No matter how zealously the U.S. and the West resort to chop logic, it is unchangeable that the MSMT is no more than a political tool for ensuring their specific interests and pressurizing sovereign states.

    No matter what new document of sanctions the hostile forces may cook up and no matter what semblance of "legality" they may give to their illegal conspiratorial organization, they cannot break the steadfast will of the DPRK to thoroughly defend its core interests and grow stronger nor check its constant development trend.

    The DPRK, as in the present so in the future, too, will never tolerate the malicious attempt of the hostile forces to bind and obstruct the state development and normal and reciprocal cooperative relations of independent countries but will strongly counter it and thoroughly defend the dignity and development interests of the state. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/b3ad05c03f927588e45a9d940f638e55

    https://archive.is/57AJw

    [–] [S] 5 points 2 days ago

    The article doesn't specify what is different about the new missile. Western media is speculating that the warhead has a mechanism capable of evading anti-missile defense system.

  • source
  •  

    UNITED NATIONS, Sept 22 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on ​Tuesday said US government ‌documents would use "super intelligence" going forward instead of ​artificial intelligence, and ​repeated his previous calls about ⁠AI warnings being ​a hoax.

    "From this point ​forward, all of United States documents, and hopefully the world's ​will be changed ​to use the much more ‌accurate ⁠term 'super' as opposed to artificial. So it's super intelligence," Trump said ​in a ​UN ⁠General Assembly speech.

    "I'm not going ​to stifle growth of ​something ⁠that will be bigger than the industrial ⁠revolution," ​he said.

     

    DPRK Missile Administration Tests New, Important Combat Weapon System

    Pyongyang, September 22 (KCNA) -- The Missile Administration of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea successfully tested a new-type weapon, which is of great significance in the rapid technological development of weapon systems, on September 20.

    The test did not have any adverse impact on the security of neighboring countries.

    It is an extension of the regular activities of the DPRK Missile Administration and its defence science research institutes aimed at implementing the national defence policy.

    Respected Comrade Kim Jong Un, General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and President of the State Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, oversaw the test.

    Saying that the test was undoubtedly a striking demonstration of ultra-modern defence technology and clear progress in the modernization of the armed forces, he stressed that it represents the irresistible might.

    To acquire such a technology is of weighty significance in the state's readiness for war and the future development of the armed forces, he said, adding that the enemy will know better what such progress means without any explanation in the aspect of military technology. He affirmed that such reality would give the enemy an incurable headache and a very cruel and unavoidable blow.

    Today's success is the priceless fruit brought by a special think tank of the sci-tech forces involved in development of the important weapon system for a specific purpose and their sincere efforts, he said, expressing thanks to the Missile Administration and its defence science institutes and working groups. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/43471f3e8d3913afbf81811967e5fbdf

    https://archive.is/JR8z7

     

    Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian will depart for New York on Tuesday to attend the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly, the chief executive’s office announces.

    The director general of public relations at the president’s Office, Habibollah Abbasi, made the announcement on Monday.

    The president is scheduled to address the General Assembly on Wednesday, Abbasi said, adding that during the visit, he will also meet and hold talks with some heads of state and officials from countries participating in the assembly.

    According to the official, the president’s schedule in New York also includes a meeting with prominent Iranians residing in the United States, as well as discussions with American intellectuals and think tanks.

    A high-ranking Iranian delegation, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, will accompany President Pezeshkian.

    Abbasi, meanwhile, described US refusal to issue visas to some members of the delegation, including members of the president’s media team, as “an unprecedented hostile move by the US administration.”

    The 81st General Assembly session is to begin on Tuesday at the UN headquarters in New York under the general theme of restoration of trust among nations.

    President Pezeshkian’s visit comes nearly eight months following the launch of the latest round of the United States' and the Israeli regime’s unprovoked aggression against the Islamic Republic.

    US President Donald Trump announced a unilateral ceasefire on April 7 amid consistent Iranian retaliation, but American violations have persisted, including through Washington’s keeping up an illegal naval blockade of Iranian ports and vessels and carrying out intermittent attacks on Iranian targets.

    Earlier this week, President Pezeshkian said Iran was ready to resolve differences with its neighbors through dialogue and mutual respect, while denouncing Washington and Tel Aviv for seeking to sustain tensions in the region.

    [–] [S] 14 points 4 days ago

    Shaq has also been a long time Zionist. In October 2024, Shaq participated in a pro-Israel media campaign for Robert Kraft's pro-Israel 'Foundation to Combat Antisemitism'. The media campaign was called 'Timeout against hate' and featured multiple ads with athletes and coaches doing the the timeout symbol in support of Israel. You can find the videos on youtube if you search 'timeout against hate'.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports/american-sports-commissioners-initiate-new-anti-hate-campaign-rcna174584

    The 'Foundation to Combat Antisemitism' website 'fcas.org' now redirects to another Robert Kraft website 'bluesquarealliance.org'. Guess who's on the about page?

    https://www.bluesquarealliance.org/about-bsa/

  • source
  •  

    https://nitter.click/FBIDirectorKash/status/2100641473188319504

    Congratulations to our newest session of FBI National Academy graduates session 299 - represented by 265 law enforcement officials from around the country.

    This session is historic - FBI was honored to be joined by one of the best supporters of law enforcement in the country - @Shaq - who graduated with this session and became an honorary FBI Special Agent.

    It’s also the first time ever a National Academy session includes two FBI special agents - representing Pennsylvania and North Carolina - making our partnerships out in the field even stronger.

    Congratulations to all - proud to serve alongside each of you. Mission first.

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7608186/2026/09/18/shaq-fbi-agent-academy-graduation/

    Shaquille O’Neal, the popular Hall of Fame basketball player and broadcaster, became an honorary FBI Special Agent this week at the bureau’s national academy graduation, FBI director Kash Patel announced.

    O’Neal is a four-time NBA champion, 15-time All-Star and the 2000 league MVP.

    The No. 7 player in The Athletic’s “Basketball 100” was also named to 14 All-NBA teams, including eight first-team selections.

    Even in retirement, the 54-year-old O’Neal remains a prominent public figure as an analyst on the wildly popular show “Inside the NBA” and a pitchman with endorsement and marketing deals with an insurance company, cereal brands, Papa John’s and several other businesses.

    Throughout his playing and post-playing career, O’Neal has been a vocal supporter of law enforcement.

    He has been sworn in as a reserve officer or deputy with police departments in Florida, Arizona, Georgia and California. He’s also made financial contributions and appearances in support of various police departments across the country.


    Shaq has reportedly responded to fan's criticism by calling them 'broke'.

    (cw miami herald article has a quotation with a black man saying the n-word)

    https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nba/article317312750.html

    [–] [S] 1 point 4 days ago* (3 children)

    Thank you for replying to my comment. I have previously made a post about /c/slop being too broad in the feedback comm, 16 months ago. I think nobody saw it because the feedback comm is local to the hexbear instance and nobody seems to read the feedback comm. I try to write my post in agreement with things you wrote in previous announcement posts. https://hexbear.net/post/4820530

    My general feeling now is that slop is trying to be a replacement to chapotraphouse. I'm guessing you are familiar with the format of chapo trap house podcast, being that you are the admin of the site which took the place of the chapo subreddit.

    What is the spirit of the Chapo Trap House podcast? It's a podcast which discusses cultural events, US politics and electoralism, US foreign policy, etc. There was even a recurring segment where Will Menaker would read newspaper columns written by like reactionaries and he would provide context about the author and criticize and so on.

    Increasingly all of these things are being posted into the slop comm, which was intended to be a comm of screenshots of bad tweets and reddit comments. I believe thedunktank was originally created by a user who wanted a comm similar to r/shitliberalssay. Now, every day I am seeing news articles and celebrity gossip and even actions of politicians being posted into the slop comm.

    Today, I saw a post in the slop comm which showed a screenshot of a video where a journalist did an investigation into the decreased in food quality of fast food restaurants. The post title criticized the journalist for expecting fast food restaurants to serve quality food. It's clear that the poster didn't watch the video, probably didn't even take the screenshot themselves, probably just re-uploaded the screenshot from reddit.

    Posts like that makes me wonder: Is it slop for a journalist to do an investigation into price gouging at fast food restaurants? Or is it slop for someone to repost a screenshot from reddit of a video thumbnail that they didn't even watch? A characteristic of slop is being low effort. Which thing is low effort? Is the post meant to be pretentious? Am I expected to believe that most people on Hexbear don't ever eat at fast food restaurants?

    My non-confrontational solution has been to repost news articles into the proper comm if they are posted into slop. I don't want confrontation. I'm not trying to be a debater, like some people have suggested. I only replied to this commenter to explain why I don't think my post belongs in the slop comm.

    One time I remember doing this was when there was the shooting at the White House Correspondence Dinner. I was watching a live feed of the event, when I heard someone mentioning the gunshots. I found a news article around 10 minutes later and posted it into the News comm. Around the same time, someone else posted another article about the shooting into the slop comm. To me, this incident was a meaningful event and was in the news cycle for at least a week afterward. However, somebody else believed that a shooting incident near the White House deserved to be posted in a comm which was intended to be screenshots of reactionaries posting on social media. That does not make sense.

    Some people may point out that this post is a screenshot of a tweet. While this is technically true. I was watching the White House press conference live stream on youtube and searched the clip on a news clip twitter account, because it is easier to share than a youtube live stream.

    To reference one of your previous announcements, you suggested that there be a comm called "counterpropaganda", which was created but didn't really take off. I don't know if that comm was your idea or the idea of another moderator. I think that the comm was a really good concept. I like the idea of promoting a more meaningful, critical discussion. I like when people read the article and comment a meaningful analysis.

    I feel like the slop comm promotes a surface level discussion. Earlier I wrote that I like the chapo podcast because they provide meaningful commentary and also that I like when when hexbear commenters make meaningful analysis. When things are posted into the slop comm that aren't social media posts screenshots, the intention is to assert that the subject is bad and to create a tone of condescension. The posts often have sarcastic title and lack context or analysis.

    Over a year ago, I requested the creation of the popularculture comm. I intended for the comm to be a semi-formal discussion of the possible material impacts of cultural trends, celebrities, and entertainment. I made many posts on the comm and I think the comm is relatively active. After I created the popularculture comm, I noticed that users were more frequently posting pop culture articles into the slop comm, a comm which is intended for screenshots of liberal opinions posted on social media. Why would people post celebrity articles into the wrong comm after I made a comm for celebrity-related articles? It feels spiteful, when some of those users had never posted such article before the popularculture comm existed.

    My preference is that the slop comm should be limited to screenshots of harmful opinions posted on social media, which was the comm's original purpose. When something is posted into the slop comm which isn't a screenshot of an opinion posted on social media, it should be removed. I'm not sure if there's any other way people will stop posting literally everything into the slop comm. It feels like slop is becoming /c/main.

    Individual comms could be made to criticize and analyze different types of reactionary thought. A comm which focuses on criticizes/discusses trends of right-wing-media would have a different analysis than a comm which discusses democrat-electoralism. Maybe there could be a comm which focuses on being anti-NATO/anti-NAFO. I think that having more specific categories would promote a deeper level of discussion.

    Sorry for the excessively long comment. I'm not intending to argue or disagree with you. I tried to write this comment in a way that agrees with your previous announcement posts.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 27 points 5 days ago* (6 children)

    I don't know what other instances you are referring to. His apology does seem like a non-apology pr stunt. He doesn't say that Israel is doing a genocide and instead says "the whole Palestinian — what started happening in Israel". Far too vague to seem like he actually cares about people in Gaza.

    I made a post last year about Matthew Lillard being opposed to ICE but silent on Gaza. https://hexbear.net/post/6609346

    It sucks because I liked his characters in 'SLC Punk' and 'Hackers'.

    I figured many people have a positive view of Matthew Lillard because he plays Shaggy in Scooby Doo, both the animated series and the live action. People view him as a children show actor.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 3 points 5 days ago* (1 child)

    You raise a lot of interesting questions, like: why do hexbears have shirtless photos of Hasan but not shirtless photos of Asmongold? Why isn't the slop comm a shirtless photo of Asmongold?

    Also you assert that Hexbear doesn't receive new users because hexbears are supportive of Hasan. Why then is Hasan's community so much larger than Hexbear? Hexbear was created at the same time that Hasan started streaming and the communities were the same size. Now Hasan millions of fans, some who say he inspired them to engage in activism, and Hexbear still seems smaller than when it was a subreddit. It must be Hasan that is holding back Hexbear's growth? Could it be that Hasan made his community have focus on optimism while communities like /c/slop are built on pessimism?

    You don't have to like Hasan. There are even many people in Hasan's community who criticize him. I said that it hurts the website to say that everything that you don't like should be posted into the slop comm. I think it's totally fine that you don't like Hasan. My point is that comms other than /c/slop are allowed to have posts that you don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 7 points 5 days ago (8 children)

    Do you always talk about yourself in the third person? >most newcomers to the site don't even know or care to know what the hell a "chapo trap house"

    Also you contradict yourself. You say that the chapo trap house comm isn't about chapo trap house, but that the slop comm must be about hasan because it has a picture of hasan. Those are 2 opposing statements.

    The reason that Hasan is the photo of the slop comm is that it was changed recently and I think that the mods admire him. That's why they chose a shirtless photo. Half the website is lusting after him. It's like when a teenager puts a poster of their celebrity crush on their bedroom wall.

    Also Hasan is the reason why that comm is called slop and not because it's about him. It's because Hasan calls refers to maga supporters as "hogs" and hasan had a segment called "hog watch". Several posters suggested that the comm be named "hog watch" or "hog trough" and the mods chose the name "slop", a spin on hog trough, which then the word slop became overused in mainstream culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›