5
submitted 12 minutes ago by dead@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
[-] dead@hexbear.net 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The meeting ended just now. CGTN video below.

There's a red carpet meeting ceremony from 30m to 50m timestamps.

From 55m to 62m, Xi and Trump give opening statements in a meeting room.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBi5ce2bFMs

26
submitted 18 hours ago by dead@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
[-] dead@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

The goal is to create a system where corruption doesn't yield material reward. You give bribery as an example, which is a material reward. Remove the ability to be bribed and then the politician can't be bribed.

For one, means of production should not be purchasable by individuals. Capital is money which is used to make more money. Capital can be used to purchase the means of production and labor, and then sell the commodities produced, to receive more money. Ownership is decided by the state's use of violence; you can't just walk in and take ownership of a factory because the state will use violence against you. The state can say that individuals or capitalists are not allowed to own means of production.

For two, fiat money can be replaced with non-transferable labor vouchers. Money can be used as capital, ie money which creates more money. Rather than being payed money at your job with money, you can be payed labor credits by the state for the amount of labor that you do. These labor credits could be used to buy things at a store that you need such as food, clothing, toiletries. Similar to how food stamps are accepted at grocery stores.

Without the bourgeois state creating mechanisms for labor to be exploited, corruption becomes impossible or at least much harder to do.

I guess bribes could still be made in precious metals but then there would need to be a black market. There would have to be a punitive system for participating in the black market.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

Lake Tahoe is a tourism/vacation town. Between 40-50% of houses in the Lake Tahoe area are empty for most of the year because people use them for vacationing.

I guess it sucks for the people who live there year round or work at the tourism places.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

"For each distributed package, rebuilderd calls debrebuild that calls debootsnap, mmdebstrap and finally sbuild to build that package within a user namespace."

https://reproduce.debian.net/

https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/

[-] dead@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

No. The repository has GPG signatures for each package. The signature is a hash which is generated using the private developer key. This verifies that the package was compiled by the Debian team. Most other distros also have package signatures, I think.

Reproducible builds means that if you compile the package on your computer from the source code provided by Debian repository, the binary package that you compile will be 100% identical to the binary package in the repository.

Currently, 97.3% of packages in the Debian repository are reproducible. The developers are promising to correct the last ~3% before the next Debian version is released, probably by the end of 2027.

There's a ton of different reasons why compiling a binary on your computer might result in a different file than the binary in the repository. You may have compiled with different libraries. The binary may include timestamps from the compile time. Files inside of a tar may be sorted in a different order.

The purpose of reproducible builds is that you can read the source code, compile the source code, and it will 100% match the binaries in the repository.

Imagine a scenario without reproducible builds. You download a binary from the developers, you download source code from the developers, you compile the code and your binary file is different. How would you know that something nasty isn't hidden inside of the binary from the developer? Distros like Gentoo solve the problem by having each user compile every package on their own machine. Debian's solution is making the packages compile exactly the same on every machine (of the same cpu architecture).

[-] dead@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Ugly God - I beat my meat

[-] dead@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

I'm not disagreeing with you. I was just noticing some people replying that they didn't know what the word means. I would agree that the anti-US position is the correct position 95% of the time.

I believe that "ultra" has probably already reached the media-sphere. I've seen the word "ultra" used by liberals to describe socialists who are against participating in US electoralism. Also seen the phrase "purity test" used in a similar way.

"Trotskyist" would be funny but I think main stream media would view Trotskyism positively.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

Which problems do Reproducible Builds Solve?

Whilst anyone may inspect the source code of free and open source software for malicious flaws, most software is distributed pre-compiled with no method to confirm whether they correspond.

This incentivises attacks on developers who release software, not only via traditional exploitation, but also in the forms of political influence, blackmail or even threats of violence.

This is particularly a concern for developers collaborating on privacy or security software: attacking these typically result in compromising particularly politically-sensitive targets such as dissidents, journalists and whistleblowers, as well as anyone wishing to communicate securely under a repressive regime.

Whilst individual developers are a natural target, it additionally encourages attacks on build infrastructure as a successful attack would provide access to a large number of downstream computer systems. By modifying the generated binaries here instead of modifying the upstream source code, illicit changes are essentially invisible to its original authors and users alike.

The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds project is therefore to allow verification that no vulnerabilities or backdoors have been introduced during this compilation process. By promising identical results are always generated from a given source, this allows multiple third parties to come to a consensus on a “correct” result, highlighting any deviations as suspect and worthy of scrutiny.

This ability to notice if a developer or build system has been compromised then prevents such threats or attacks occurring in the first place, as any compromise can be quickly detected. As a result, front-liners cannot be threatened/coerced into exploiting or exposing their colleagues.

Several free software projects already provide reproducible builds, or will do soon.

https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/which-problems-do-reproducible-builds-solve/

47

https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2026/05/msg00001.html

Aided by the efforts of the Reproducible Builds project [1], we've decided it's
time to say that Debian must ship reproducible packages. Since yesterday, we
have enabled our migration software to block migration of new packages that
can't be reproduced [2] or existing packages (in testing) that regress in
reproducibility.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There seems to be confusion in the comments about what "campist" means. The pejorative "campist" in this instance means someone who anti-US imperialism. That mod is angry that NATO is compared to Nazism and NATO is an enacter of US imperialism. That mod supports NATO.

"Tankie" is used a pejorative for communist. Campism, in this case, means that you have the tendency to side with whatever country the US is attacking.

Campism means categorizing countries into camps on whether the countries support US imperialism or are against US imperialism or neutral.

The alleged criticism of campism is that being anti-US doesn't mean pro-Socialism. The accuser would say, "You shouldn't support Russia/Iran because those countries are not socialist". The campist pejorative is meant to mean that you are a fake socialist for liking certain countries that aren't socialist.

I've seen the leftist tiktoker Madeleine Pendleton self-identifying as a campist.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

She tweeted this article about herself in July 2022. It's published on a PRC .cn tld. Taiwan uses the .tw tld. The article says that she was born in Chengdu China. The article talks about her campaign in Arcadia and some of her early life.

Your comment is not worthless because now you know Eileen Wang was born in Chengdu.

https://xcancel.com/eileen1282/status/1545658611497517056#m

https://web.archive.org/web/20220716101831/https://icitynews.com.cn/?p=330028

100
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3353203/southern-california-mayor-will-plead-guilty-acting-agent-chinese-government

Yesterday, Eileen Wang, the mayor of Arcadia California was arrested on the suspicion of working as an agent for the PRC. She is expected to plead guilty. Her boyfriend/fiance Yaoning "Mike" Sun received a similar charge in December 2020, under Biden's presidency. Mike Sun was sentenced to 4 years in federal prison in October 2025.

US DoJ alleges that Eileen Wang and Mike Sun operated a propaganda news website called "US News Center", which provided local news for Arcadia but also news related to China. US DoJ alleges that PRC officials sent stories to Eileen and Mike to publish on the website. US DoJ alleges that a PRC official instructed Eileen Wang to publish an article which said "there is no genocide in Xinjiang".

I obviously don't believe the US DoJ, Adrien Zenz, etc. Also I read the Eileen Wang arrest story on like a dozen different news websites and none of the websites provided the link to "US News Center". So I found her website and now I'm sharing it. I want people to see what US DoJ considers to be be "pro-PRC propaganda".

doj . gov press statement on Eileen Wang Arrest
https://archive.is/UMPah

December 2024 court document for Mike Sun case
https://web.archive.org/web/20250213044049/https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/media/1381256/dl

Eileen Wang wikipedia was created today
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eileen_Wang

Another NATOpedia page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_espionage_in_California#Eileen_Wang

Eileen Wang's twitter account - features her political campaign stuff and links to "US News Center"
https://xcancel.com/eileen1282

Mike Sun's twitter account - mostly posts links to "US News Center", retweeted Eileen's campaign in 2022
https://xcancel.com/m18625013500

Eileen Wang's campaign website
https://web.archive.org/web/20220325001641/http://eileen4arcadia.com/

Eileen Wang's youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/@CouncilmemberEileenWang

Eileen Wang's tiktok is @eileenli88. It seems deleted.

The "US News Center" url was posted on Eileen's and Mike's twitter pages with different variations. I'm not sure if the websites are different but they appear the same at first glance.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210111170922/https://www.usnewscenterla.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20210518235824/https://usnewsctr.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20220210171033/https://usnewscta.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20220506144023/https://usnewsctrla.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20240121045654/http://usnewscenterca.com/

https://www.usnewsla.com/ this url was used also but there is not good archive.

75
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/popularculture@hexbear.net
[-] dead@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They're mad about this. Also in this role play, Trump is Darth Vader. So they make Trump into the villain.

https://archive.is/fdOeo

49
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
81
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
91
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net
[-] dead@hexbear.net 52 points 6 days ago

At first when I read the tweet, I thought the OP was criticizing Hasan. The tweeter who posted this clip believes that there shouldn't be a third party in the US, also the tweeter is Canadian. That tweeter is a huge Hasan fan and many of the tweets are thirsting for Hasan. In the 10 minute video, Hasan says that he's not against a communist party forming in the United States. Then he says that his involvement with Democrat Party shit is because he thinks it will increase people's political awareness.

The second clip he says "Yeah i don't care man" in a dismissive tone, meaning that he doesn't care what the chatter thinks. The chatter presents a hypothetical that Platner would have killed 200 girls and Hasan dismisses the hypothetical. The clipper is trying to make it seem like Hasan supports killing girls but Hasan is saying that he doesn't care to entertain the hypothetical. Hasan obviously doesn't like that the US bombed an Iranian school, killing 160 girls. He says that all the time.

You can tell that the first tweeter is a fan because the clip is 10 minutes long. Haters aren't going to watch a 10 minute clip. You can tell that the second tweeter is a hater because they posted a 7 second clip. The 7 second clip is short so that you don't get any sense of context. It is meant to deceive the viewer.

Graham Platner is a war criminal. It's kind of funny how much Establishment Democrats are talking about Hasan. It doesn't really matter what Hasan thinks. He can't stop you from organizing into a new party.

You should organize a communist party.

75
submitted 1 week ago by dead@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net
22
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by dead@hexbear.net to c/videos@hexbear.net

Speakers at the memorial service:

  • Christian Parenti - his son, author, journalist
  • Max Blumenthal - editor for The Gray Zone
  • Jimmy Dore - crank youtuber, antivaxxer
  • Dennis Kucinich - former congress member of Ohio
  • Marcie Smith - Economics Professor at John Jay College, Christian Parenti's wife

https://consortiumnews.com/2026/04/25/watch-live-memorial-service-for-michael-parenti/

71
27
submitted 1 week ago by dead@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Press Statement of Permanent Representative of DPRK to UN

Pyongyang, May 7 (KCNA) -- Kim Song, permanent representative of the DPRK to the UN, issued the following press statement on May 6:

At the 11th NPT review conference now under way at the UN Headquarters, the U.S. and some vassal countries are tarnishing the atmosphere of the conference, groundlessly taking issue with the present position and exercise of sovereign rights of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a nuclear weapons state outside the treaty.

The NPT review conference, which should contribute to the international issue of nuclear disarmament and the solution of the root cause of the danger of nuclear conflict, loses its original mission and turns into a place of malicious accusation against the sovereign states according to the sinister political attempt of the U.S. and Western forces. This is the fundamental reason why the global non-proliferation system is weakening.

I denounce and reject in the strongest tone the brigandish and shameless acts of the specific countries including the U.S. which are taking issue with the DPRK's realistic and just access to nuclear weapons through the legal route and exercise of its inherent defensive rights as a sovereign state.

The wrong behavior of the U.S. and Western countries forcing the DPRK, which transparently exercised the right to withdraw from the treaty according to Article 10 of the NPT, to fulfill the treaty obligations is a wanton violation of the spirit of the treaty and a total disregard of the purpose and principle of international law.

Before insisting obstinately on the observance of treaty obligations of the DPRK, which legally withdrew from the NPT decades ago, the U.S. should answer first whether the same criteria apply to the implementation of the obligations of various international treaties and international organizations conventions it had quit.

The soundness and legality of the NPT are not shaking by the exercise of the rights of a sovereign state existing outside the treaty, but are eroding from inside by the failure in obligations of some treaty member states including the U.S. which are abusing the nature and application of the treaty arbitrarily.

It should be the essential point of implementing the NPT and the main agenda item of the current review conference to rectify the violation of treaty obligations of the U.S. and some countries which are now neglecting the obligations to nuclear disarmament as the signatories to the NPT and resorting to such proliferation acts as offer of "extended deterrence" and transfer of nuclear submarine technology to non-nuclear states.

The position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state does not change in accordance with rhetorical assertion or unilateral desire of outsiders.

Clarifying once again, the DPRK is not bound by the NPT in any case.

The DPRK will make a positive contribution to the efforts of the international community to ensure international peace and security and promote global strategic stability by remaining faithful to the law on the state nuclear force policy which clarifies the mission of nuclear force, the principle of using nuclear weapons and the obligation to prevent proliferation in a most transparent way and to the implementation of its obligations under the state Constitution which fixes its legal position as a nuclear weapons state. -0-
www.kcna.kp (2026.05.07.)

http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/d80359e3bbc5db5f023f326429ba5f60.kcmsf

https://archive.is/lzVaE (kcna)

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/north-korea-not-bound-any-treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons-kcna-reports-2026-05-06/

view more: next ›

dead

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 5 years ago