Full transcript below. I downloaded it from the UN website. I verified that it matched the video, there was 1 typo.

I had prepared a speech to present to you yesterday.
The United States President described us as terrorists.
We have been the victims of terrorism.
I come from an Iran in which our esteemed Supreme Leader was assassinated without any legal framework or reason.

I come from an Iran where, in truth, they bombed a school.
You see these children?
These children perished under bombs, with weapons used by the United States and Israel.
They were innocent, had committed no crimes.

Lamerd, one of the small cities in a province in Iran, a sports hall where children were busy playing.
The United States, by using weapons with multiple warheads, targeted that sports hall.
They martyred, assassinated, our scientists, our men, women, and children.
Innocent children who, in truth, had committed no crimes, no sins.

Those who are terrorists and train and protect terrorists describe us as such.
We have only defended ourselves.
We are not terrorists.
Our innocent people have been the targets of cowardly attacks and aggressions imposed upon our country, and we defended ourselves with utmost strength.

America and Israel attacked us, equipped with the latest technology and weapons systems, and our people stood steadfast.
Yes, they did hit us, but we did not bend the knee.
We did not bow our head.
We responded, but we did not hit civilian populations.

They came into surrounding territories and targeted our universities, our healthcare centers, our schools, our hospitals, our infrastructures—all of it against international law.
When I took over the responsibilities as President, they assassinated Ismail Haniyeh in Iran.
On the day of my inauguration, Israel targets any neighborhood, in any city, in any province, commits assassinations like a true terrorist.
In Gaza, over 80,000 innocent civilians have been murdered, brutally murdered.

Hundreds of thousands have been displaced.
They are committing genocide by using the so-called technologies that they have at their disposal.
Then they label others as terrorists.
Are we the sources of instability?

We only seek to live independently.
We are the ones who cause instability.
Those who are committing terrorism and committing crimes, are they the protectors of peace and stability?
None of the international laws have been adhered to by them.

This is what we're facing.
We don't want anything.
We have received our response.
We need strength, because a people which is unable to defend itself will be trampled upon in today's world.

We live in a world in which the powerful, instead of thinking about humanity, justice, fairness, and democracy, they seem to be the protectors and creators of instability and destruction.
Whomever they wish to discredit, they label them as terrorists.
Two hundred years—for the past two centuries— Iran has not attacked any country or any territory, but we've always defended ourselves steadfastly.
But now we're being accused of being source of instability in the region?

We're labeled terrorists?
And this has made it so that the path that we have chosen for ourselves requires power to defend ourselves.
We do not seek power in order to attack or commit aggression.
We seek energy for progress, not to threaten societies with weapons.

And we wish to cooperate and collaborate for security.
The people of Iran, in the past 7 months, our people, have been in the streets every night demonstrating in support of their land, of their homeland, so as to not allow those who were equipped and trained and armed by Israel and America to cause disruption in the security of their country.
For 7 months, day and night, they've been present in the streets.
They are our source of power and our support.

And that's why we stand fast.
Iran must be powerful so as to avoid being threatened, to avoid its future being threatened.
We do not wish to use our power for hegemony, and we do not seek our security in the insecurity of others.
Vis-à-vis Iran's defense, our defensive systems have been built so that no one can think that bombing of Iranian cities will go unanswered.

That is why we have the military power we do for defense.
But we say it clearly: in order to defend our country, we do not seek anyone's permission or approval.
We seek energy for progress.
For years, there have been—they have labeled centrifuges, international sanctions, other labels—when it comes to our nuclear technology.

But for our country, peaceful nuclear technology is part of our inherent progress.
For our sick people, it is cure and treatment.
For the agricultural sector, it is food security.
For industry, it is advancement and progress and supply of electrical energy.

Iran does not accept for nuclear technology to be at the exclusive disposal of some, of a handful.
We will not— we will not bow our head and give up the right that is inherently ours.
We say it clearly: no nuclear weapons, and no limitations to peaceful nuclear technology.
Our peace will not come in the field of battle.

But they must give the needed security to the people and nation of Iran.
We seek cooperation in order to have security.
We live in a region in which warfare knows no borders.
Crisis in one land will spill into the surrounding nations.

That's why Iran does not see her neighbors as security rivals.
We want to have strong neighbors.
In waters in the Strait of Hormuz, we do not— we cannot let some have free access and gain their interests from a waterway while at the same time using that waterway to impose their aggressions upon us, to impose insecurity upon us, to forbid us access to our own waterways.
They close access for us to our own waterway, yet they keep supplying missiles and deadly military technologies to bring insecurity to all of the lands surrounding that waterway.

We will not succumb to that.
The expansion of warfare will not result in security.
One cannot create chaos for the coastal countries seeking naval security.
Excellencies, vis-à-vis Palestine, Palestine remains an open wound on the conscience of the international community, and Gaza remains a symbol of the failure of international mechanisms to prevent civilian suffering.

For decades, resolutions have been adopted, yet occupation and violence have continued.
We cannot speak of peace while ignoring Palestine.
Lasting peace in West Asia is impossible without justice for Palestine.
As long as occupation, aggression, and injustice persist in the world, resistance will continue.

If it is weakened in one form, it will reemerge in others, perhaps stronger still.
Gaza, despite relentless killing and widespread devastation, has strengthened the people's faith in resistance.
And resistance cannot be destroyed by bombs and siege.
This is human nature.

If a human being is driven from his or her land, they will resist.
If their homes are subjected to bombings and aggression and attacks, they will resist.
What other choice do they have?
Succumb to bullying?

To be driven from their homes, from their lands, and remain silent in the face of these threats and dangers?
And when they defend themselves, they're labeled as terrorists?
The language makes it, unfortunately, clear the type of world that we're living in today.
Our regional issues must be resolved in the region, at the hands of the countries in the region, without becoming a toy in the hands of outside aggressors.

No relationship with a foreign power can become the tools of threatening neighboring countries in the region.
And now, a few words with those who are responsible for having planned and carried out aggressions against our country and our people have experienced firsthand the result of their deadly aggression.
And they have tested the strength and the steadfastness of Iran, and they have learned that Iran cannot be made to surrender.
Iran has never, ever been an aggressor, has never started a war, and has always shown her commitment to the negotiating table.

They imposed the war on us, but we proved—we have proven—that we're not afraid of fighting, of war, a war that is defensive in nature.
And we will stand in defense of our beloved Iran, our homeland, until our last breath.
Ladies and gentlemen, the topic of this gathering is mutual trust.
That cannot be achieved through words only, but by abstaining from using double standards.

Atomic and nuclear bombs are in the hands of the Israeli regime, but the inspectors are requested to come to Iran.
Israel has murdered savagely over 70,000 innocents in Gaza, but Iran, while behind the table of negotiation, was bombed.
Israel has the bombs, has weapons of mass destruction, not a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty during her shameful life has not allowed a single inspection.
But they are rewarded by all the means necessary for them to be able to bomb any capital in the region at will.

I will repeat: the nuclear weapon is in Israel, but the inspectors in Iran.
Israel kills, but Iran is subject to sanctions.
This is a true tragedy, which would make anyone hearing it laugh, at best.
They kill, we are sanctioned, we are punished.

Those who are ill, innocent people, the poor, the least privileged in our society, are the targets of these sanctions.
And this is what the United States seeks to do with all countries: to sacrifice the population of a country in order to achieve her illegitimate goals.
If we seek true peace and stability, we must apply a single standard for all.
Iran does not seek special treatment.

We seek equal rights.
We assume the responsibility, accept the responsibility that comes with it.
But Iran, during her prideful history, has learned the following lesson: a world without power is dangerous, but a world that only understands the language of war and bullyism will not be safe.
When we seek to have agendas to implement that only adhere to the benefits of a few privileged, we will have a world in disarray.

But we see that this will become a world much more dangerous for all of us.
We must not allow the 21st century to go back to an era of only the powerful and the bullying powers and the hegemons.
We must not build a world in which military power replaces legitimacy, terrorism replaces politics and negotiations, and war replaces dialogue and diplomacy.
Iran extends her hand towards the world.

We invite the world.
We call the world, not out of weakness, but out of a deep belief in our own power and steadfastness, to cooperate and collaborate.
Because of a deep belief that no one in this region will have security alone.
Either we will build it together, or we will have to live under insecurity together.

We seek to think about a world future in which security, fairness, justice, human dignity will become unalienable rights for all people, for all humans.
A future in which no people are driven to the sidelines, no voice is lost in the chaos of power, and no power will have the right to determine the future of a people other than those people themselves.
If we truly seek to have an order based on international law and standards, it must be based in justice, common human will, uplifting human dignity.
Because a peace that does not encompass all is no peace, and fairness and justice that does not embrace all is not worthy of being called justice and fairness.

But going back to the words of the President of the United States yesterday shows those who are experts in international law and dialogue and diplomacy and basic human standards that everything other about our country goes against the very essence and charter and the spirit of the United Nations.
He must know that the resistance of the Iranian people will only increase in the face of sanctions, increased pressure, increased bullying.
We will never bow our head or bend at the knee.
Iran must be understood by Mr. Trump and those who seek to bully us that we are ready for dialogue and diplomacy and negotiations without accepting the language of force.

I truly appreciate your time and presence here.
May God bless you all.

https://gadebate.un.org/en/81/iran-islamic-republic

[–] [S] 1 point 22 hours ago* (1 child)

Sorry for the delayed reply. I wanted to take some time to think about it more so that I don't create controversy or confusion. I can make a post in /c/hexbear for a discussion of a proposal. I would like to propose that slop posts must showcase social media posts, as stated in its original purpose. The original comm request says that the comm was intended to showcase social media posts.

Most of the posts on the slop comm already meet this requirement. It is things being posted into the comm like news articles, op-eds, videos of politicians speaking, images of food, etc that do not meet that definition.

https://hexbear.net/post/830

A SRS-style community dedicated to showcasing the worst of reactionaries across all social media, including Reddit.

EDIT: The community will be named !TheDunkTank.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 6 points 23 hours ago*

    This hacker group is known for extortion. Earlier this year, ShinyHunters acquired the data of 275 million students at 8800 schools through the Instructure Canvas hack. ShinyHunters didn't release the Instructure Canvas data after the ransom was paid by Instructure.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Canvas_data_breach

    It says that Amtrak didn't pay the ransom and that the Amtrak data was published. A website called "haveibeenpwned" has acquired the Amtrak user data and you can check if you were affected by the hack by entering your email address.

    https://haveibeenpwned.com/Breach/Amtrak

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Have_I_Been_Pwned%3F

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Press Statement of DPRK Foreign Ministry Spokesperson

    Pyongyang, September 21 (KCNA) -- A spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea released the following press statement on Monday:

    The foolish behavior of the U.S. and the West is again sparking off criticism and ridicule of the world as they have openly ignored the principles of international law with respect for sovereignty and non-interference as the core and sought to save the structure of sanctions and pressure on the DPRK from its total bankruptcy.

    Recently, the U.S.-led "multilateral sanctions monitoring team (MSMT)" cooked up and announced a "report" pulling up the beneficial and routine economic cooperative relations between the DPRK and other countries and thus vividly revealed its true colors as a plot-breeding organization which distorts normal as abnormal and brands legal as illegal.

    The MSMT is a ghost group lacking any legality in the justification and purpose of existence. Its illegal act committed under the signboard of implementing the UN "resolution" is just a violation of the UN Charter and international law and a mockery of the international community.

    The U.S.-led isolated minority group has never been given the mission and authority to act on behalf of the UN, and "resolutions" against the DPRK cooked up by the UN Security Council wantonly violating the sovereignty and the rights to development of a sovereign state have never been recognized by the DPRK.

    What the MSMT, made up of pseudo experts addicted to the compilation of sanctions, has done is nothing but to devise all sorts of conspiracy theories under the U.S. command, and there is no room for discussion about the reliability and objectivity of such documents they have produced.

    The DPRK's relations of exchange and cooperation with other countries cannot be subject to interference or investigation of a third party in any case as they are the exercise of legitimate rights under bilateral and multilateral treaties and agreements.

    The UN Charter stipulates as one of the main purposes of the UN to develop friendly relations among nations on the principle of equality and self-determination, and the declaration on the principles of international law on friendship and cooperation among nations under the UN Charter, adopted as Resolution 2625 of the UN General Assembly, specifies that any country or group of states has no right to interfere in the internal affairs and external affairs of other countries.

    What should be questioned and rejected in the present international relations are bad behaviors of the U.S. and the West openly conducted worldwide, in contravention of the purpose and principle of the UN Charter which disallows the use of and threat by force against the political independence and territorial integrity of any country.

    No matter how zealously the U.S. and the West resort to chop logic, it is unchangeable that the MSMT is no more than a political tool for ensuring their specific interests and pressurizing sovereign states.

    No matter what new document of sanctions the hostile forces may cook up and no matter what semblance of "legality" they may give to their illegal conspiratorial organization, they cannot break the steadfast will of the DPRK to thoroughly defend its core interests and grow stronger nor check its constant development trend.

    The DPRK, as in the present so in the future, too, will never tolerate the malicious attempt of the hostile forces to bind and obstruct the state development and normal and reciprocal cooperative relations of independent countries but will strongly counter it and thoroughly defend the dignity and development interests of the state. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/b3ad05c03f927588e45a9d940f638e55

    https://archive.is/57AJw

    [–] [S] 5 points 1 day ago

    The article doesn't specify what is different about the new missile. Western media is speculating that the warhead has a mechanism capable of evading anti-missile defense system.

  • source
  •  

    UNITED NATIONS, Sept 22 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on ​Tuesday said US government ‌documents would use "super intelligence" going forward instead of ​artificial intelligence, and ​repeated his previous calls about ⁠AI warnings being ​a hoax.

    "From this point ​forward, all of United States documents, and hopefully the world's ​will be changed ​to use the much more ‌accurate ⁠term 'super' as opposed to artificial. So it's super intelligence," Trump said ​in a ​UN ⁠General Assembly speech.

    "I'm not going ​to stifle growth of ​something ⁠that will be bigger than the industrial ⁠revolution," ​he said.

     

    DPRK Missile Administration Tests New, Important Combat Weapon System

    Pyongyang, September 22 (KCNA) -- The Missile Administration of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea successfully tested a new-type weapon, which is of great significance in the rapid technological development of weapon systems, on September 20.

    The test did not have any adverse impact on the security of neighboring countries.

    It is an extension of the regular activities of the DPRK Missile Administration and its defence science research institutes aimed at implementing the national defence policy.

    Respected Comrade Kim Jong Un, General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and President of the State Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, oversaw the test.

    Saying that the test was undoubtedly a striking demonstration of ultra-modern defence technology and clear progress in the modernization of the armed forces, he stressed that it represents the irresistible might.

    To acquire such a technology is of weighty significance in the state's readiness for war and the future development of the armed forces, he said, adding that the enemy will know better what such progress means without any explanation in the aspect of military technology. He affirmed that such reality would give the enemy an incurable headache and a very cruel and unavoidable blow.

    Today's success is the priceless fruit brought by a special think tank of the sci-tech forces involved in development of the important weapon system for a specific purpose and their sincere efforts, he said, expressing thanks to the Missile Administration and its defence science institutes and working groups. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/43471f3e8d3913afbf81811967e5fbdf

    https://archive.is/JR8z7

     

    Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian will depart for New York on Tuesday to attend the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly, the chief executive’s office announces.

    The director general of public relations at the president’s Office, Habibollah Abbasi, made the announcement on Monday.

    The president is scheduled to address the General Assembly on Wednesday, Abbasi said, adding that during the visit, he will also meet and hold talks with some heads of state and officials from countries participating in the assembly.

    According to the official, the president’s schedule in New York also includes a meeting with prominent Iranians residing in the United States, as well as discussions with American intellectuals and think tanks.

    A high-ranking Iranian delegation, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, will accompany President Pezeshkian.

    Abbasi, meanwhile, described US refusal to issue visas to some members of the delegation, including members of the president’s media team, as “an unprecedented hostile move by the US administration.”

    The 81st General Assembly session is to begin on Tuesday at the UN headquarters in New York under the general theme of restoration of trust among nations.

    President Pezeshkian’s visit comes nearly eight months following the launch of the latest round of the United States' and the Israeli regime’s unprovoked aggression against the Islamic Republic.

    US President Donald Trump announced a unilateral ceasefire on April 7 amid consistent Iranian retaliation, but American violations have persisted, including through Washington’s keeping up an illegal naval blockade of Iranian ports and vessels and carrying out intermittent attacks on Iranian targets.

    Earlier this week, President Pezeshkian said Iran was ready to resolve differences with its neighbors through dialogue and mutual respect, while denouncing Washington and Tel Aviv for seeking to sustain tensions in the region.

    [–] [S] 14 points 3 days ago

    Shaq has also been a long time Zionist. In October 2024, Shaq participated in a pro-Israel media campaign for Robert Kraft's pro-Israel 'Foundation to Combat Antisemitism'. The media campaign was called 'Timeout against hate' and featured multiple ads with athletes and coaches doing the the timeout symbol in support of Israel. You can find the videos on youtube if you search 'timeout against hate'.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports/american-sports-commissioners-initiate-new-anti-hate-campaign-rcna174584

    The 'Foundation to Combat Antisemitism' website 'fcas.org' now redirects to another Robert Kraft website 'bluesquarealliance.org'. Guess who's on the about page?

    https://www.bluesquarealliance.org/about-bsa/

  • source
  •  

    https://nitter.click/FBIDirectorKash/status/2100641473188319504

    Congratulations to our newest session of FBI National Academy graduates session 299 - represented by 265 law enforcement officials from around the country.

    This session is historic - FBI was honored to be joined by one of the best supporters of law enforcement in the country - @Shaq - who graduated with this session and became an honorary FBI Special Agent.

    It’s also the first time ever a National Academy session includes two FBI special agents - representing Pennsylvania and North Carolina - making our partnerships out in the field even stronger.

    Congratulations to all - proud to serve alongside each of you. Mission first.

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7608186/2026/09/18/shaq-fbi-agent-academy-graduation/

    Shaquille O’Neal, the popular Hall of Fame basketball player and broadcaster, became an honorary FBI Special Agent this week at the bureau’s national academy graduation, FBI director Kash Patel announced.

    O’Neal is a four-time NBA champion, 15-time All-Star and the 2000 league MVP.

    The No. 7 player in The Athletic’s “Basketball 100” was also named to 14 All-NBA teams, including eight first-team selections.

    Even in retirement, the 54-year-old O’Neal remains a prominent public figure as an analyst on the wildly popular show “Inside the NBA” and a pitchman with endorsement and marketing deals with an insurance company, cereal brands, Papa John’s and several other businesses.

    Throughout his playing and post-playing career, O’Neal has been a vocal supporter of law enforcement.

    He has been sworn in as a reserve officer or deputy with police departments in Florida, Arizona, Georgia and California. He’s also made financial contributions and appearances in support of various police departments across the country.


    Shaq has reportedly responded to fan's criticism by calling them 'broke'.

    (cw miami herald article has a quotation with a black man saying the n-word)

    https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nba/article317312750.html

    [–] [S] 1 point 3 days ago* (3 children)

    Thank you for replying to my comment. I have previously made a post about /c/slop being too broad in the feedback comm, 16 months ago. I think nobody saw it because the feedback comm is local to the hexbear instance and nobody seems to read the feedback comm. I try to write my post in agreement with things you wrote in previous announcement posts. https://hexbear.net/post/4820530

    My general feeling now is that slop is trying to be a replacement to chapotraphouse. I'm guessing you are familiar with the format of chapo trap house podcast, being that you are the admin of the site which took the place of the chapo subreddit.

    What is the spirit of the Chapo Trap House podcast? It's a podcast which discusses cultural events, US politics and electoralism, US foreign policy, etc. There was even a recurring segment where Will Menaker would read newspaper columns written by like reactionaries and he would provide context about the author and criticize and so on.

    Increasingly all of these things are being posted into the slop comm, which was intended to be a comm of screenshots of bad tweets and reddit comments. I believe thedunktank was originally created by a user who wanted a comm similar to r/shitliberalssay. Now, every day I am seeing news articles and celebrity gossip and even actions of politicians being posted into the slop comm.

    Today, I saw a post in the slop comm which showed a screenshot of a video where a journalist did an investigation into the decreased in food quality of fast food restaurants. The post title criticized the journalist for expecting fast food restaurants to serve quality food. It's clear that the poster didn't watch the video, probably didn't even take the screenshot themselves, probably just re-uploaded the screenshot from reddit.

    Posts like that makes me wonder: Is it slop for a journalist to do an investigation into price gouging at fast food restaurants? Or is it slop for someone to repost a screenshot from reddit of a video thumbnail that they didn't even watch? A characteristic of slop is being low effort. Which thing is low effort? Is the post meant to be pretentious? Am I expected to believe that most people on Hexbear don't ever eat at fast food restaurants?

    My non-confrontational solution has been to repost news articles into the proper comm if they are posted into slop. I don't want confrontation. I'm not trying to be a debater, like some people have suggested. I only replied to this commenter to explain why I don't think my post belongs in the slop comm.

    One time I remember doing this was when there was the shooting at the White House Correspondence Dinner. I was watching a live feed of the event, when I heard someone mentioning the gunshots. I found a news article around 10 minutes later and posted it into the News comm. Around the same time, someone else posted another article about the shooting into the slop comm. To me, this incident was a meaningful event and was in the news cycle for at least a week afterward. However, somebody else believed that a shooting incident near the White House deserved to be posted in a comm which was intended to be screenshots of reactionaries posting on social media. That does not make sense.

    Some people may point out that this post is a screenshot of a tweet. While this is technically true. I was watching the White House press conference live stream on youtube and searched the clip on a news clip twitter account, because it is easier to share than a youtube live stream.

    To reference one of your previous announcements, you suggested that there be a comm called "counterpropaganda", which was created but didn't really take off. I don't know if that comm was your idea or the idea of another moderator. I think that the comm was a really good concept. I like the idea of promoting a more meaningful, critical discussion. I like when people read the article and comment a meaningful analysis.

    I feel like the slop comm promotes a surface level discussion. Earlier I wrote that I like the chapo podcast because they provide meaningful commentary and also that I like when when hexbear commenters make meaningful analysis. When things are posted into the slop comm that aren't social media posts screenshots, the intention is to assert that the subject is bad and to create a tone of condescension. The posts often have sarcastic title and lack context or analysis.

    Over a year ago, I requested the creation of the popularculture comm. I intended for the comm to be a semi-formal discussion of the possible material impacts of cultural trends, celebrities, and entertainment. I made many posts on the comm and I think the comm is relatively active. After I created the popularculture comm, I noticed that users were more frequently posting pop culture articles into the slop comm, a comm which is intended for screenshots of liberal opinions posted on social media. Why would people post celebrity articles into the wrong comm after I made a comm for celebrity-related articles? It feels spiteful, when some of those users had never posted such article before the popularculture comm existed.

    My preference is that the slop comm should be limited to screenshots of harmful opinions posted on social media, which was the comm's original purpose. When something is posted into the slop comm which isn't a screenshot of an opinion posted on social media, it should be removed. I'm not sure if there's any other way people will stop posting literally everything into the slop comm. It feels like slop is becoming /c/main.

    Individual comms could be made to criticize and analyze different types of reactionary thought. A comm which focuses on criticizes/discusses trends of right-wing-media would have a different analysis than a comm which discusses democrat-electoralism. Maybe there could be a comm which focuses on being anti-NATO/anti-NAFO. I think that having more specific categories would promote a deeper level of discussion.

    Sorry for the excessively long comment. I'm not intending to argue or disagree with you. I tried to write this comment in a way that agrees with your previous announcement posts.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Respected Comrade Kim Jong Un Guides Work of Defence Industry

    Pyongyang, September 19 (KCNA) -- Respected Comrade Kim Jong Un, General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea and President of the State Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, learned about the production at major munitions industrial enterprises from September 16 to 18.

    He was accompanied by Vice-Chairman Pak Jong Chon and member Kim Jong Sik of the Central Military Commission of the WPK, Yu Chang Son, director of the Artillery Bureau of the General Staff of the Korean People's Army, and Ri Pyong Chol, Ri Il Hwan, Kim Yo Jong, Kim Jae Ryong and O Yong Jae, who are cadres of the Central Committee of the WPK, and leading officials in the sector of defence science research.

    Comrade Kim Jong Un learned in detail about the production of each enterprise.

    In hearty response to the decisions of the Ninth Congress of the WPK, the major munitions industrial enterprises turned out in attaining the new year's production goals. They are steadily increasing the revolutionary enthusiasm and making upsurge in production, recording high results every day.

    Comrade Kim Jong Un warmly encouraged the working class who are reliably stepping up the radical growth of our munitions industry and its more independent and advanced development through their energetic and devoted labour struggle, always full of revolutionary zeal.

    He expressed great satisfaction over the fact that the major munitions industrial enterprises are fulfilling their plans for the production of combat equipment on the most important indices of urgent military significance in a responsible manner without fail and, as a result, the huge plans issued by the Party Central Military Commission are being successfully carried out one by one.

    He appreciated the major munitions industrial enterprises for carrying on without an inch of deflection the projects for expanding the production capacity assigned by the Party to meet the requirements of the all-round plan for reorganizing and modernizing the artillery combat force of our army.

    Stressing that the fulfillment of this year's production plans is most essential in attaining the new Five-Year Plan aimed at fresh progress and leap forward in the building of a powerful army and the defence industry, he said that the major munitions industrial enterprises should continue to consolidate the current trend in production and dynamically and simultaneously conduct a series of technical infrastructure reinforcement for promoting the long-term munitions production plans.

    He said that the building of a powerful artillery force is the core for deterring and fighting war, adding that our artillery should have the most concentrated and destructive, massive and versatile offensive capability and responsibly perform the two missions of deterring and fighting war. He stressed that the achievements made by the DPRK in all fields to modernize all components of the national defence capability including artillery are meaning a significant change in the composition and means of our armed forces and their plan for countering a war. Stating that the enemy's military systems would be gradually damaged and useless by action of the irresistible might which we have already possessed or will soon possess, he said that the munitions industrial enterprises at all levels under the Second Economy Commission should play a bigger role in carrying out the strategic policy of the Party on building the most powerful army and the country's munitions industry should be further expanded and strengthened.

    He said that the production success at the major munitions industrial enterprises is not merely significant for increased production but it is of weighty significance as it is undoubtedly a product of the will and efforts of the working class to defend our sovereign security, and this is a great contribution for the state.

    Stressing that major munitions industrial enterprises have a very pivotal role to play in steadily augmenting the country's war deterrent and war-fighting capability, he encouraged them to vigorously continue their patriotic production drive for steadily equipping our army with the most powerful and overwhelming strategic strength.

    He clarified important policy-oriented tasks for the enterprises' production and management, including the issue of steadily accelerating the expansion of production capacity and the modernization of technical processes, raising the level of artificial intelligence of offensive and defensive combat weapon systems and putting the armor and automation of artillery weapons on a higher stage and the issue of bettering the conditions and environment for production.

    Comrade Kim Jong Un expressed expectation and belief that all the officials, technicians and workers serving at important core factories would continue to fully display their inherent creation spirit and fighting spirit and thus powerfully propel the radical strengthening of our armed forces. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/afa1f3792f6dcb1db01ef52bb76c197f (13 photos)

    https://archive.is/PpmkK

    [–] [S] 27 points 4 days ago* (6 children)

    I don't know what other instances you are referring to. His apology does seem like a non-apology pr stunt. He doesn't say that Israel is doing a genocide and instead says "the whole Palestinian — what started happening in Israel". Far too vague to seem like he actually cares about people in Gaza.

    I made a post last year about Matthew Lillard being opposed to ICE but silent on Gaza. https://hexbear.net/post/6609346

    It sucks because I liked his characters in 'SLC Punk' and 'Hackers'.

    I figured many people have a positive view of Matthew Lillard because he plays Shaggy in Scooby Doo, both the animated series and the live action. People view him as a children show actor.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Matthew Lillard admitted to being “embarrassed” by his decision to return to the Scream franchise after the producers fired Melissa Barrera for her vocal support of Palestine in 2023. Lillard reprised his role as Stu Macher in this year’s Scream 7 despite the controversy.

    During a recent audience Q&A at a 30th anniversary screening of the original Scream, Lillard was asked about the difficulty of speaking up about politics as an actor. “I don’t know how else to do it,” Lillard responded. “For me, I have queer kids. If I’m not standing up for queer kids or kids in the trans community, then what the fuck am I doing? If I’m not standing up against ICE, then what the fuck am I doing?”

    He added “I don’t think it’s easy all the time,” citing the example of Barrera’s firing. “Melissa Barrera, who’s a beautiful actor, was fired for what she said after the whole Palestinian — what started happening in Israel,” Lillard said. “It’s really fucking bullshit and really hard, and she’s on the right side of history. When they start coming after your job, sometimes things are worth it… When that happened to Melissa, the whole world didn’t pipe up. But she was a year early on what the fuck’s going on. But the whole world should have popped up and said, ‘She’s right.’ And they didn’t. And that’s brutal.”

    “I went back to do Scream, and I got called out,” Lillard acknowledged. “And I’m like, ‘Oh, fuck. That’s brutal.’ I feel bad about that. I feel ashamed about that. Because in that moment I was so excited to go back, I didn’t really think about Melissa and that journey. I didn’t say no. I’m embarrassed. That’s the truth… I blew that. I’m on the wrong side of history for that. I still like being in the movie [but] it may not have been the best idea.”

    In 2022, Spyglass rebooted the Scream franchise with Barrera as its new lead. She starred as Sam Carpenter, the secret love child of deceased Ghostface killer Billy Loomis (Skeet Ulrich), for two films. However, in late 2023 Spyglass announced they were dropping the actress from subsequent sequels for making pro-Palestine statements on social media. Spyglass said at the time it has “zero tolerance for antisemitism or the incitement of hate in any form.”

    Barrera responded by saying “Silence is not an option for me.” She wrote, “I condemn Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. I condemn hate and prejudice of any kind against any group of people. As a Latina, a proud Mexicana, I feel the responsibility of having a platform that allows me the privilege of being heard, and therefore I have tried to use it to raise awareness about issues I care about, and to lend my voice to those in need.”

    [–] [S] 3 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    You raise a lot of interesting questions, like: why do hexbears have shirtless photos of Hasan but not shirtless photos of Asmongold? Why isn't the slop comm a shirtless photo of Asmongold?

    Also you assert that Hexbear doesn't receive new users because hexbears are supportive of Hasan. Why then is Hasan's community so much larger than Hexbear? Hexbear was created at the same time that Hasan started streaming and the communities were the same size. Now Hasan millions of fans, some who say he inspired them to engage in activism, and Hexbear still seems smaller than when it was a subreddit. It must be Hasan that is holding back Hexbear's growth? Could it be that Hasan made his community have focus on optimism while communities like /c/slop are built on pessimism?

    You don't have to like Hasan. There are even many people in Hasan's community who criticize him. I said that it hurts the website to say that everything that you don't like should be posted into the slop comm. I think it's totally fine that you don't like Hasan. My point is that comms other than /c/slop are allowed to have posts that you don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 days ago (8 children)

    Do you always talk about yourself in the third person? >most newcomers to the site don't even know or care to know what the hell a "chapo trap house"

    Also you contradict yourself. You say that the chapo trap house comm isn't about chapo trap house, but that the slop comm must be about hasan because it has a picture of hasan. Those are 2 opposing statements.

    The reason that Hasan is the photo of the slop comm is that it was changed recently and I think that the mods admire him. That's why they chose a shirtless photo. Half the website is lusting after him. It's like when a teenager puts a poster of their celebrity crush on their bedroom wall.

    Also Hasan is the reason why that comm is called slop and not because it's about him. It's because Hasan calls refers to maga supporters as "hogs" and hasan had a segment called "hog watch". Several posters suggested that the comm be named "hog watch" or "hog trough" and the mods chose the name "slop", a spin on hog trough, which then the word slop became overused in mainstream culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 20 points 4 days ago* (12 children)

    This idea that everything that happens outside in the real world needs to be posted into the slop comm is detrimental to the website. The slop comm was intended to be a place for things that are so offensive that it harms people. Now almost everything is posted in the slop comm. It is the second largest comm and growing. The slop comm is not serving its intended purpose of protecting users from actually harmful content.

    Donald Trump is the president of the United States. Hasan Piker is a friend of Chapo Trap House. This is Chapo Trap House comm. Neither of the subjects are so offensive that they need to be quarantined. The president of the united states beefing with a twitch streamer is a notable subject of discussion and related to the Chapo Trap House universe.

    Hasan's twitch stream was basically a spin-off show from the Chapo podcast. Chapo promoted Hasan in 2019. Felix Biederman is a good friend of Hasan. Felix helped launch Hasan's twitch audience by co-streaming Fortnite in 2018.

    Are you Chapo Trap House? Why are you saying that a friend of the podcast shouldn't be discussed in a community focused on the podcast?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Press Statement of Spokesperson for DPRK Foreign Ministry

    Pyongyang, September 19 (KCNA) -- A spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea released the following press statement on Friday:

    The hostile forces cooked up and made public a "resolution" against the DPRK at the 70th Session of the IAEA General Conference on Sept. 17.

    In the "resolution", they picked quarrel with the DPRK's legitimate and self-defensive exercise of sovereignty, arguing that the DPRK cannot have nuclear weapons under the NPT, they express serious concern over the DPRK's sustainable nuclear activities, and all nuclear weapons and nuclear programs should be abandoned in a complete, verifiable and irreversible way.

    The DPRK has not been a member of the NPT and the IAEA from long ago and, therefore, it is illegal and the height of impudence to talk about the position of our state and its efforts to bolster up the defence capabilities.

    The DPRK's position as a nuclear weapons state does not need the recognition of the U.S., the West and the IAEA. It is guaranteed by the actual nuclear deterrent and irreversibly and permanently fixed by the supreme law of the state.

    Pitifully, the "resolution" cooked up by the U.S. and the West has no effect on the DPRK's position as a nuclear weapons state.

    No matter how desperately the hostile forces may try to deny our constitutional position in and around the IAEA, the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state, which is permanently and absolutely settled by the law, is irreversible.

    It is the DPRK's invariable line of national defence to more offensively implement its strategic and long-term plans for building reliable self-defensive deterrent to cope with the ever-worsening international security environment.

    As a responsible nuclear weapons state, the DPRK will as ever firmly defend the sovereignty and fundamental interests of the state and thoroughly guarantee peace and security in the region and the rest of the world by deterring all challenges and threats from outside by overwhelming force. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/551cb53d9d184def31fedaebb231ea56

    https://archive.is/CQS58

    Press Statement of Kim Yo Jong, Department Director of C.C., WPK

    Pyongyang, September 19 (KCNA) -- Kim Yo Jong, department director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, issued the following press statement "The prejudiced viewpoint and double standards of the IAEA are the main factor that incurred the collapse of the international nuclear non-proliferation system" on Sept. 19:

    With the 70th Session of the IAEA General Conference held in Vienna of Austria as an occasion, the IAEA's chronic prejudice and double-standard behavior was revealed again.

    On September 17, the IAEA forcibly adopted an anti-DPRK "resolution" to call into question our state's self-defensive and legitimate nuclear activities, disregarding the grave situation in which the DPRK's security environment is exposed to constant nuclear threat of outside forces.

    Such meaningless and inefficient "resolution", which the IAEA is cooking up every year at the instigation of the U.S. and the West, is not something new for us and has no effect on the DPRK's position as a nuclear weapons state.

    The nuclear activities of the DPRK, a nuclear weapons state outside the NPT which withdrew from the IAEA through legal routes decades ago, are not object of jurisdiction of the IAEA and, the agency has no authority or qualifications to interfere in them.

    Therefore, we never recognize any anti-DPRK "resolution" cooked up in the arena of the IAEA.

    On the other hand, the IAEA has consistently kept silence, failing to say a right word about the undisguised nuclear proliferation act of the U.S., a depository of the NPT, and the grave plan for the introduction of nuclear submarine by the ROK, a non-nuclear state.

    This is another typical example clearly showing the extreme two-faced nature and prejudice of the agency.

    As a result, the IAEA vividly revealed its true nature as a Western power organization, unfortunately and completely being deprived of its representative character and impartiality as a UN specialized organization and representing only the interests of the U.S. and its allies.

    The double standard of the IAEA is not confined to the Korean peninsula but is being witnessed in Europe, Oceania, the Middle East and other parts of the world.

    The fact that the U.S. deployed nuclear weapons in Europe and shared them with NATO member states, while wantonly violating the non-proliferation obligation of NPT stipulating that nuclear weapons and their management should not be handed over directly and indirectly to anyone, the fact that it actively dragged the ROK and Japan in its plan for nuclear weapons use and its implementation under the pretext of "offer of extended deterrence" and the fact that it is planning to provide nuclear submarine technology for the ROK - all those facts do not become the subject of discussion and concern of the agency in any case.

    Moreover, the agency is disregarding Japan's unusual excess accumulation of weapons-grade nuclear materials under the patronage of the U.S. despite the protest of the international community.

    The two-faced nature of the agency has led to the creation of a new "nuclear non-proliferation standard" whereby the nuclear activities of a relevant country are regulated as "legitimate" or "illegal" according to whether the nuclear issue is of the West or not. This is the present reality of the nuclear non-proliferation system led by the U.S. and the West.

    In fact, the IAEA has certainly been reduced to the U.S. atomic energy organization, and it is no exaggeration to say that the international nuclear non-proliferation system has removedd into the U.S.-led nuclear proliferation system.

    The injustice, prejudice and double standards of the IAEA are the main factors eroding the nuclear non-proliferation system on a global scale, and the U.S. open nuclear proliferation behavior being committed in parallel with this is a serious threat disturbing international peace and security and increasing the danger of outbreak of a nuclear war.

    The main mission of the IAEA is to provide all member states with the right to peaceful use of nuclear power and to block the military use of nuclear technology, and it is by no means to connive at and foster undisguised nuclear proliferation.

    In my personal view, the IAEA might save its disgraced face even a bit if it takes courage to say a single right word about who is the chieftain of undermining the nuclear non-proliferation system.

    The further the IAEA interferes in the sovereignty and internal affairs of the DPRK, a non-member state, the worse its reputation and fame will be damaged, and it should judge by itself who will benefit from it.

    Conniving at the nuclear threat and proliferation of the U.S. and other hostile forces and asking the DPRK to abandon its nuclear weapons are just like telling us to give up our existence and right to live.

    We will not in any case mortgage our sovereignty and security rights to the "tolerance" of the U.S. and the West.

    The present grave geopolitical situation, in which the international nuclear order is at the brink of complete collapse due to the radical nuclear arms buildup and undisguised nuclear proliferation of the U.S. and to the double-dealing behavior and lack of principle of the IAEA, requires the DPRK to make a more responsible option.

    It is the most important matter for the national security to ensure that the credibility of the nuclear force is not questioned in any case for the DPRK which is constantly exposed to the nuclear threat of the hostile forces. -0-

    http://kcna.kp/en/article/detail/bb63503e5a21ff5bbe0dd766766204ce

    https://archive.is/aRg38

    view more: next ›