Check out Adeem the Artist, non-binary communist country singer.
The game is like a sandbox. Imagine minecraft. Children play minecraft. Some people go into minecraft and spend a few hours building a cute little house. Some people put 1000 hours into minecraft and build circuit board replicas.
I think a casual gamer could complete the POE 2 campaign in 20-25 hours. Maybe closer to 10 hours if you follow character guide. The campaign is like the tutorial for the game. If you still like the game after completing the campaign, then you unlock the "The Atlas"/"map device" and that's where the real game begins.
I have not tried the shapeshifting character.
The POE 2 campaign has dark-souls-like characteristics. The game says you should press space bar to dodge roll out of boss attacks. Some of the boss attacks can kill you in 1 hit if you don't dodge. The boss resets if you die. I hate the Viper boss in Act 3 the most.
The trailer says "Free to play" on December 11, but the game is really difficult to play if you don't spend at least like $20-30 on stash space. You can at least finish the campaign (level 70) without spending any money.
I think that the "escape from North Korea" narrative is probably similar to the "escape from Cuba" narrative.
Are there chuds in DPRK who would like to escape because they think they can go become a small business tyrant in the US or somewhere else? Of course. Every country has reactionaries.
Is every person in DPRK wishing they could escape so that they can go become a small business tyrant in the West? No, I think most people who live in DPRK and also Cuba, actually enjoy living in their countries and their country's social system.
What about the economic hardships in DPRK and Cuba? The economic hardships in the DPRK and Cuba are caused by decades of sanctions created by the United States. People in DPRK and Cuba blame the United States for the economic hardships, not their own government. People in DPRK know that the United States places sanctions on many countries including DPRK, Cuba, Iran, Russia, Venezuela, etc.
Do people in DPRK actually like Kim Jong Un? Probably yes. Imagine you were born in North Korea. Less than 100 years ago, the United States invaded Korea and slaughters hundreds of thousands of civilians and destroy thousands of homes. Now there is a leader of the country who has successfully deterred the United States from invading again through investing in nuclear armament. Why wouldn't you like the leader who is deterring another US invasion?
It's a massive gas station. Buc-ee's are known for having 80-120 gas pumps per gas station.
Coincidentally, 8/21 is the same day that Hasan was banned from twitch for saying 'America Deserved 9/11' in 2019. Trump referenced the quote for the first time on 8/21/2026.
I think this video clip is from the rally for Darline Graham in Myrtle Beach. The audio sounds like Trump is reading from a teleprompter.
ComplainieLainie or MadelinePendleton. Lainie talks about disability stuff a lot and mostly does news commentary late at night. Madeline Pendleton talks about the news on weekdays around noon - 2pm EST. They both read Marxists theory books during the commentary.
Interesting press statement from DPRK. It says that the US and its vassals are the source of geopolitical crisis in Middle East, Europe, and Korean Peninsula.
It says that Ukraine and Zelensky are lying about additional DPRK troops being deployed to Russia. It clarifies that previous deployment of DPRK troops to Russia were legal under UN law.
It says that DPRK doesn't care that Trump is downsizing the Ulchi Freedom Shield US-ROK military exercises because the drills are provocative in nature and should not exist at all.
It says that Kim Jong Un has good memories and feelings about his personal relationship with Trump. However, Trump has not changed the US's hostile policies to DPRK
https://hexbear.net/post/9337537
https://archive.is/3gb2V (KCNA)
e/ fixed a typo
I had already clarified several times that our head of state has good memories and feelings about Trump personally.
The relationship between the two leaders is still excellent.
It is well known to the world and not a matter to be surprised, I think.
However, the U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK has remained unchanged and the U.S. and its followers are now violently conducting hostile military activities against the DPRK even this moment.
Related to this.
DPRK posted a commentary on the 2024 US presidential election. The commentary says that Trump tried to be personal friends with Kim Jong Un but his policies towards DPRK were the same as any other US president. Trump is a fake friend.
Amid the full-dress presidential election race in the U.S., Trump, who has been officially confirmed as a candidate for the Republican Party, said in his speech of acceptance for candidate that "I got along with them and it is nice to get along with someone who has a lot of nuclear weapons and otherwise", thus buoying a lingering desire for the prospects of the DPRK-U.S. relations. Even if any administration takes office in the U.S., the political climate, which is confused by the infighting of the two parties, does not change and, accordingly, we do not care about this.
It is true that Trump, when he was president, tried to reflect the special personal relations between the heads of states in the relations between states, but he did not bring about any substantial positive change.
He that puts on a public gown must put off a private person. The foreign policy of a state and personal feelings must be strictly distinguished.
https://hexbear.net/post/3054729
Then 1 year ago, Kim Yo Jong, who is now the Director of the General Affairs Department of the WPK and also sister of Kim Jong UN, said that the personal relationship between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump is "not bad". However, if Trump's intention is to denuclearize DPRK, then the personal relationship is a mockery.
I do not want to deny the fact that the personal relationship between the head of our state and the present U.S. president is not bad.
However, if the personal relations between the top leaders of the DPRK and the U.S. are to serve the purpose of denuclearization, it can be interpreted as nothing but a mockery of the other party.
2 week ago, Zelensky and Ukrainian media made that claimed that DPRK was deploying 50,000 troops to fight for Russia.
Previously, DPRK had said that they deployed troops to the Kursk region of Russia. Zelensky lied 2 weeks ago by saying that DPRK deploy troops to Russia again.
The article claims that it was reported by KCTV on August 6. I can't verify if this true because KCNAWatch paywalled their KCTV archive and youtube regularly deletes KCTV clips.















