Wheaties

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 days ago

A serious party would hold the vote anyway, and withhold campaign funding from party members that act against it.

Clearly they don't hold bodily autonomy very highly, or they wouldn't be compromising on it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Talk about an institution that's outlived itself. Jeopardy may have been on the air longer, but even that still has juice in its veins. Look at SNL when it started and it's a who's who of people that would go on to bigger and better things. Now it's where acting careers go to die prematurely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I was thinking the hidden final boss of a Kirby game

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Apparently it was one of the big Freedoms™ people would point to in the 19th century.

"What makes America so free? Why, you can manufacture what you like, print and sell anything! Copyright? Patent? Sheer humbugery!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

and it's never from any sort of principled stance or understanding of Islam, it's just because for the last twenty years Muslims have been a socially accepted punching-bag in the english-speaking world.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's a lot of answers here, but I think this is the most useful.

There's lots of different ways to be atheist, but Reddit Atheism is a specifically Christian phenomenon; (typically) people who were raised in Protestant Christian culture, and stopped believing in God without really examining any of the other beliefs and underlying assumptions that came with it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Perhaps I'm misremembering, but I'm pretty sure he describes everything about life as just a means for DNA to propagate itself. As if DNA isn't merely a component in a larger, more complex and complicated system, but as the reason for the whole thing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Really highlights just how ass-backwards Richard Dawkins is when he suggests DNA is the begging and the end, the only thing that actually matters

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yer dad, and yer dad alone, knows the mystery behind gravity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

this might be the Matt rant you were referring to

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtaTzFmAabk

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

There's not a ding dang ol' pumpkin in the White House cheeto-man

68
oh.... (hexbear.net)
 

Not that anybody asked, but I think it's important to understand how shame and guilt actually work before you try to use it for good.

It's a necessary emotion. There are reasons we have it. It makes everything so. much. worse. when you use it wrong.

Shame and guilt are DE-motivators. They are meant to stop behavior, not promote it. You cannot, ever, in any meaningful way, guilt someone into doing good. You can only shame them into not doing bad.

Let's say you're a parent and your kid is having issues.

Swearing in class? Shame could work. You want them to stop it. Keep it in proportion, and it might help. (KEEP IT IN PROPORTION!!!)

Not doing their homework? NO! STOP! NO NOT DO THAT! EVER! EVER! EVER! You want them to start to do their homework. Shaming them will have to opposite effect! You have demotivated them! They will double down on NOT doing it. Not because they are being oppositional, but because that's what shame does!

You can't guilt people into building better habits, being more successful, or getting more involved. That requires encouragement. You need to motivate for that stuff!

If you want it in a simple phrase:

You can shame someone out of being a bad person, but you can't shame them into being a good person.


It was nice to see this put so clearly. This election cycle has left me exhausted and demotivated, and this hits it square on the head.

stolen from https://grungekitty-77.tumblr.com/post/754482938951892992/fun-fact-that-was-literally-what-inspired-me-to

 

It's such a cornerstone of theater, the music is so damn good. Somehow I expected it to be from like the 1800s

 

The court said Israel has no right to sovereignty of the territories, is violating international laws against acquiring territory by force and is impeding Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

It said other nations were obliged not to “render aid or assistance in maintaining” Israel’s presence in the territory. It said Israel must end settlement construction immediately and existing settlements must be removed, according to a summary of the more than 80-page opinion read out by Salam.

 
 

It gets bandied about as though it's in contrast to nature, separate from it. Like, "I'd take civilization over nature any day; there's lions and tigers and bears out there!" As if we left evolution, red in tooth and claw, behind. There's a reason Marx and Darwin are contemporaries.

I'd like to here propose a distinction; a difference in kind and scale. There's Generational Evolution -- Darwin outlined this while sketching finches and pinning insects to corkboards. It's slow. Generations upon generations, infinitesimally small changes seeping through populations bit by bit. He described it as "survival of the fittest" but I think "perpetuation of the first thing that just so happens to work" better captures it.

And then there's Behavioral Evolution. If the first sort of evolution was slow, this one is a lightning-strike. Genetic Evolution needs a bottleneck to up the pace - needs to crawl right up next to extinction for a new trait to propagate in only a lifetime or two. We, on the other hand, just need to talk to each other. We learn. Our behavior changes at the rate we allow it to.

Of course, it's not as if we're no longer subject to that older sort of evolution. Genes still do their thing - but, again, that wheel turns slow. It's got a great and terrible momentum. We don't harness it. Not this century, or the next. Hell, probably not even this millennium. We have a much more attainable goal - harnessing Behavioral Evolution.

At present, we use words like "civilization" as though we already have. As though we're not still stuck perpetuating the first thing that just so happens to work. As though liberal-democracy nation-states were some deliberate design and not just classes of people acting out of material self-interest, reacting to others doing the same, enriching themselves via the latest scheme that happens to work. It's funny; here in the US, the people who deny evolution and the people who champion market economics have such a broad overlap.


this, I believe, is how we frame the struggle of the 21st century. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the evolution of class struggles." Communism is the belief, the dream, of putting consciousness in the driver's seat. Of making dialog the defining evolutionary pressure, rather than a mere component.

 

written in the fucking 1970s

 

I thought i would try to learn to read Chinese characters. I saw a thing somewhere once that said characters are organized by the number of brush-strokes in them, so in the past you kinda had to already know what you were looking up to find anything on it. I got the internet though!

世 - this is the first character I learned, and according to Google translate, it means 'world'. Wiktionary says it means other things to, like 'society', 'generation', even 'woman' and 'marriage'?? those last two feel like they're more contextual.

[stolen from wiktionary]

seeing it written out, it makes me think first of the horizon, with pillars or towers rising above it. shadows extend from them. it makes me think if how people discovered/verified the curve of the Earth by measuring shadows, so it seems fitting.

The next one I've learned is "大", which appears to be a suffix meaning 'big/much/very'. it's supposed to look like a little guy with arms stretched out to emphasis how BIG something is! ...again, going on Wiktionary for this...

Which gives me

世大 - BIG WORLD (google thinks this says university...)

or, alternatively


Very Society :marx-joker:

...am i doing this right? Or, at least, not terribly wrong? I kinda wanna hit the point where I can read Mao or Three Body Problem in the original text.

 

I know it's spelled "minute". That was a typo and I am not going to fix it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›