[–] 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I'd like to think it will actually make a more stable Europe, once enough of them realize the US is not their friend and they need to fast-track decoupling. You see bits and pieces, the biggest of which (to my dumbass spectator's position) looks like that initiative to make a Euro specific payment processing system.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 24 points 6 days ago

    It wasn't all that long ago, this was the pitch for a capitalist world; everyone is too economically interdependent to realistically go to war with each other.

    Obviously in practice, its a lot more messy than that. Great powers are pretty much free to make war on whatever small countries they like. But we may not see any of them take a total war footing in our lifetimes. Peer to peer conflict is self destruction. The columnists and news pundits and other such clergy, the people who exist to find justifications for whatever rich powerful people were gonna do anyway, they may not like it -- but this is the world they argued for.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Being polite to others in your day-to-day even when you strongly disagree can be... aggravating sometimes... and people need an outlet. I would consider most of the language here to be venting frustrations - which (in any setting) trend toward the colourful and hyperbolic for the catharsis of merely saying it, rather than expressing genuine intent.

    speech-side-r-1qin-shi-huangdi-fireballspeech-side-r-2 took-restraint Is a joke. Mostlyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    It turns out the world may not be quite so contaminated, it's just the research laboratories.

    Scientists may have been unknowingly inflating microplastics pollution estimates, and the surprising source could be their own lab gloves. A University of Michigan study found that common nitrile and latex gloves release tiny particles called stearates, which closely resemble microplastics and can contaminate samples during testing. In some cases, this led to wildly exaggerated results, forcing researchers to track down the unexpected culprit.

    I love science. I don't mean that disingenuously . I do kinda love that years of research on this topic asking the big important questions, and it all gets tripped up by someone eventually asking the small, easily forgettable, procedural question.

     

    link to thread

    maaaaybe these unnamed instances are using this to root out reactionary content? (still silly, AI gives you yes or no answers basically on an overcomplicated coinflip and spits out text to justify that initial answer) But c'mon. Freaking out about "people we strongly disagree with" using a sketchy moderation tool on "their instances"?

    A specter is haunting the fediverse, and that spectre is hexbear-specter . Well really its mostly lemmy.ml but sometimes they remember we exist too.

    It sounds like they're using this to find "tankie" users and they're scared that the "tankie" instances will use this (stupid, counterproductive) moderation style on them (lol). Admittedly conjecture on my part.

    screenshot from piefed.social: AI-assisted moderation in the fediverse is happening. Now what? by Rimu.  I recently discovered that some popular federated instances have been using LLM-assisted moderation tooling that evaluates whether someone has said something bannable. They do this by running a script/app that sends the user’s comment history to OpenAI with the question “analyze this content for evidence of specific political ideology sentiment. Also identify any related political ideology tropes“. (The italic bits are where I’ve redacted the ideology they’re seeking).
    view more: next ›