[–] 10 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

Being polite to others in your day-to-day even when you strongly disagree can be... aggravating sometimes... and people need an outlet. I would consider most of the language here to be venting frustrations - which (in any setting) trend toward the colourful and hyperbolic for the catharsis of merely saying it, rather than expressing genuine intent.

speech-side-r-1qin-shi-huangdi-fireballspeech-side-r-2 took-restraint Is a joke. Mostlyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    That's kinda what's so amusing about him. And it makes him a better barometer of where your average chud yankee is; the people who vote "R" and maybe even have a media diet of Fox News, but are still kind and decent to others in their actual interpersonal interactions. The walking contradictions, if I'm being really crass about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    These screen shots, these prompts... this is what I'd expect code to look like in a sci-fi written by someone who doesn't really know anything about computers. Except its real, and the product of billion dollar companies.

  • source
  •  

    It turns out the world may not be quite so contaminated, it's just the research laboratories.

    Scientists may have been unknowingly inflating microplastics pollution estimates, and the surprising source could be their own lab gloves. A University of Michigan study found that common nitrile and latex gloves release tiny particles called stearates, which closely resemble microplastics and can contaminate samples during testing. In some cases, this led to wildly exaggerated results, forcing researchers to track down the unexpected culprit.

    I love science. I don't mean that disingenuously . I do kinda love that years of research on this topic asking the big important questions, and it all gets tripped up by someone eventually asking the small, easily forgettable, procedural question.

     

    link to thread

    maaaaybe these unnamed instances are using this to root out reactionary content? (still silly, AI gives you yes or no answers basically on an overcomplicated coinflip and spits out text to justify that initial answer) But c'mon. Freaking out about "people we strongly disagree with" using a sketchy moderation tool on "their instances"?

    A specter is haunting the fediverse, and that spectre is hexbear-specter . Well really its mostly lemmy.ml but sometimes they remember we exist too.

    It sounds like they're using this to find "tankie" users and they're scared that the "tankie" instances will use this (stupid, counterproductive) moderation style on them (lol). Admittedly conjecture on my part.

    screenshot from piefed.social: AI-assisted moderation in the fediverse is happening. Now what? by Rimu.  I recently discovered that some popular federated instances have been using LLM-assisted moderation tooling that evaluates whether someone has said something bannable. They do this by running a script/app that sends the user’s comment history to OpenAI with the question “analyze this content for evidence of specific political ideology sentiment. Also identify any related political ideology tropes“. (The italic bits are where I’ve redacted the ideology they’re seeking).
    view more: next ›