With how good most AI image generation is nowadays I always wonder where people generate these dogshit quality images.
The real reason..
I guess those ideological issues were the acceptance and safe space for queer people, but fuck us I guess. Don't worry, we won't hop on over to the shit show.
Maybe we can start a 197 like how 196 came from 195.
What a shitty fucking take from some power tripped mods.
The boomers always used to call millenials snowflakes, but fucking hell, if censoring swearwords isn't ACTUAL snowflake behaviour.
For clarification, I'm not saying millenials are snowflakes.
I have 2 therapists and was going to a lot of sex parties, still wanted an SO.
I think that a large majority of trans girls don't have body shapes like that, so the idea kinda falls flat and you end up hating yourself because even after bottom surgery, you still can't pull off that look at all.
Not that I would know anything about that 🤥
Edit: Yes, I get that this is on the extreme side of things, but as I said in another comment, there is a phenotype and often we don't fit into the one we so desperately want to.
I often times hate these trans/hrt memes because of how comedically unrealistic the results they portray are and how shitty they make me feel.
Its a bone of contention for me.
As much as I hate the fuck, I feel like harping on this point just makes men who get hair transplants feel embarrassed, and there shouldn't be a stigma around cosmetic surgery.
Yeah, corporations are doing great, the "economy" is a good indication of that, but it means fuck all for us.
Trans people, seriously, they just want to live their lives in peace. They're not here to radicalise anything or to "trick" anyone. They just want to get on with their lives and be left alone.
Soon it'll be illegal to end your ovulation cycle because every egg is a life. Jesus these people are some fucking dumb religious zealots.
What they're saying here is that the right is made from people who are fucked up, have very little respect and are often racist, not that there's anything wrong with the left. But they're too dumb to realise that I guess.
Hi,
I'm looking for some help in a field that is super technical and I don't fully understand.
I'm planning on using a bunch of these seeed studio Esp modules for some home automation projects, especially because they have a lipo battery charger making it great for portable stuff.
The thing is the the ESP32s have U.FL SMD antenna connectors. Most of the antennas that you can buy with U.FL connections while are reasonably small, come with 50-150mm leads, which sort of makes the small size of the module a little less valid.
What I'd like to do is get a female U.FL SMD connector and make a small daugherboard with an 2.4GHz SMD antenna on it, for instance a Janson 2450AT42B100 or a Molex 479480001.
They go over the circuit board requirements quite thoroughly so I don't think designing it will be too difficult, but what I don't know is, they say that you need impedance matching on the circuit, and I see that there appears to be something that looks like it on the ESP circuit diagram, but I'm not actually sure if it is or not:
You can see it in the middle near the bottom of the diagram here: Seeeduino-XIAO-ESP32C3-SCH
So my questions are:
1: Is this a dumb idea, having a direct plug-on SMD antenna?
2: Is that an impedance matchning circuit between LNA_IN on the ESP chip and U.FL-R-SMT-1?
3: If I can't get a female U.FL SMD connector, would using one with a lead and shortening it to make the daughterboard able to be much closer to the connector affect anything? Do I need to ensure that the lead length matches the wavelength at all?
Edit: Found this SMD female U.FL, so they do exist.
Nothing happens for any "reason". Existence just is, and people really should come to terms with that.
The universe doesn't give a fuck about anything, it's just matter interacting, the only reasons are the laws of physics, which seem generally to be more like suggestions at times.