top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 97 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I love Game Pass, but I don't like monopolies. I wish regulators had blocked this. Also: https://www.theonion.com/just-six-corporations-remain-1819564741

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I was laughing at the onion article and stopped- was that really published in 1998 ?!?!? Or is the date also a joke?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    It really is that old. According to their Supreme Court amicus brief: “Rising from its humble beginnings as a print newspaper in 1756, The Onion now enjoys a daily readership of 4.3 trillion and has grown into the single most powerful and influential organization in human history.” Seriously though, read that brief. It’s a masterful piece of satire.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's hard to block mergers based on a company involved being a monopoly if none of the companies involved are monopolies or will become monopolies.

    Regulators have to come up with a different set of rules to block "large but not monopolistic mergers" without also just effectively protecting the actual leader in a given industry from competition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    What a sad day for gamers. Microsoft now has all it needs to extinguish PlayStation & assert a monopoly on consoles, just as they do on PCs already, and the regulators will give them a wink and a nudge.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    They can't even manage to beat Steam on their own OS to be fair lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Is Steam competing with Microsoft's "Netflix but with games" service?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No, and yet Steam is still winning. Game Pass can be a sick deal but many still prefer paying just a little more on a Steam Sale to own a game forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Consoles are walled-gardens altogether. Also poor Sony set the markt rules with their 3rd-party exclusives for how many generations now?

    If you want to keep gaming as far away from enshittificarion as possible, then set up a linux gaming pc. It's not bad anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sony set the markt rules with their 3rd-party exclusives

    This is Nintendo erasure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Which 3rd party exclusives are they sitting on except Bayonetta 2/3? I can't remember that many.

    Nintendo has the same dumb practices, but they do it with their own IPs, which is a little less annyoing. Also they aren't the main player like Sony has been for the last two decades. They just own the Mario-and-Zelda-tablet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We are so far away from that being even possible, let alone likely. Even Valve has successfully decoupled about 95% of PC gaming from Microsoft.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm talking about the platform, not the store front. Windows has far more than 90% of the PC gaming world market share, far more than what's enough to monopolize the PC gaming scene; GNU and macOS are a super distant second and third place. Whenever most people talk about "PC gaming", what they really mean is Windows, even though there are other PC platforms out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Whilst monopolies are a terrible thing for consumers.

    PlayStation and Nintendo still have the best first party lineups and IP available to them. I don’t think this is as big of a deal as people would like to make it seem.

    I do agree this should have been blocked by regulators just as I thought with the Bethesda acquisition. Sony also with the acquisition of Bungie.

    There should be a restriction on the purchasing of studios/publishers of a certain size.

    Certainly isn’t going to hurt Sony or Nintendo. I also don’t think this is the big WIN that Microsoft thinks it’s going to be either.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Because, to the majority of console gamers in the Americas and Europe, Call of Duty, FIFA, GTA, and Madden are the Only Games That Actually Matter™. There are a few million people that buy PlayStations just to play 1-2 of those games to the exclusion of everything else.

    Now that they've taken out one of the four major reasons why people outside of Asia buy PlayStations, they can extinguish PlayStation & assert a monopoly on console gaming. It's sickening.

    And somehow, I don't think that Sony resurrecting the Resistance series & making it into an annual release that always launches during the holiday season will make much of a difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    It's still an improper invocation of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish regardless; only Call of Duty came along with this sale, so by your own logic, they still can't have a monopoly; there are several other franchises, owned by several other corporate entities that Microsoft doesn't own, that would fit on that list of yours; and IMO, Resistance was never good anyway, so if they want to make their own Call of Duty, they're starting from scratch, and they've got a decade to figure it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Is there anything to back up the idea that call of duty is the behemoth it once was? Fortnite seems to be far more culturally relavent than war zone and seems to be both more profitable and have a larger player base. Don't get me wrong cod is still a big game, I just have my doubts it's making or breaking the whole industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    It applies to most business.

    1. You give a positive face to the market you’re in (Game Pass, Phil Spencer, pro-dev vibe, etc).
    2. You buy chunks of the market (Activ-Bliz-King is a massive chunk), while saying it’s good for the industry.
    3. You squeeze the company of its IP, while bleeding the market dry of money. All of which kills, or at least hurts that market.

    Right now, Micro$oft is in the Extend phase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    If you bring up Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, especially since we're talking about Microsoft, that is not what it means, and your definition has issues, because if you're buying a big company for a lot of money, the last thing you want to do is extinguish it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well at least Microsoft can't ruin Blizzard any more than Activision ruined it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's a shame the UK's Competitive Markets Authority let this merger go through after all. I can't wait for the future, when 90% of the most popular games are made by 3 companies

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly this is bad for the gaming industry.

    I understand a lot of game pass subscribers want more free stuff.

    But just look at what Netflix had became after its success.

    Or even just look at MS’s track record in using their monopolies to bully competitors.

    Years later we will look at this and watch the tragedy unfold.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Now gut the boys club C Suite from ABK and help the thousands of employees.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Bring back Heroes of the Storm and add Master Chief in damnit

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago*

    They showed Alex Mercer from Prototype in their announcement video

    They knew

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's quite interesting, leaving aside all the monopoly arguments, I think this has potential to being very beneficial to all blizzard games, and so to us.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It looks like Kotick will be leaving after the transition so that's a great start. My dream is that this all somehow leads to the full Overwatch PvE campaign coming back onto the table again (given that their attempts to provide long-term replay ability without doing the work seem to be floundering now, there's a chance right?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›